User talk:Acronymos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Matick (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Somepinkdude was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No independent sources with non-trivial coverage apart from #4.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Somepinkdude (talk) 01:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi Somepinkdude, and thank you for reviewing the draft. I’ve reworked Draft:Joseph Matick to address the notability concerns you raised.
In particular, I have:
– Added and foregrounded several independent, in‑depth sources, including a Flaunt profile (“Joseph Matick – Two Songs”), a long interview and photo essay in Boys by Girls (“BBG Presents: Joseph Matick”), a detailed Q&A in Echo Room about the album Western Pink, and a full review of that album in Magazine Sixty that describes it as “an important document for the times”.
– Cited a Billboard feature on Girlyboi (with Joseph Matick) and coverage in outlets such as Flaunt and C‑Heads to document his earlier work in fashion‑adjacent music contexts.
– Retained primary sources (official site, Far West Press, library catalogs) only for straightforward factual details, and ensured that claims of significance or interpretation are supported by independent sources.
I understand the need for significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. If you have time to take another look at the current version, I would appreciate any further guidance on whether the independent profiles, review and Q&A now meet the threshold for notability under WP:BIO.
Thank you again for your time and help. Acronymos (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Acronymos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Somepinkdude (talk) 01:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:36, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Matick (March 14)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Nighfidelity, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Joseph Matick to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Nighfidelity (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI