User talk:PhilKnight

You may want to revoke TPA here. They are making non-English (Italian) PAs. 🪷 nahida 14:11, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. Done. PhilKnight (talk) 14:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thank you so much for helping me secure and fix my account! Julie Crowell (Ask me a question) 12:51, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Who has this 'consensus' been developed with exactly? People who are his fans? Neither him nor his fans would want what I have put out, to be out there of course. There is no libel or slander going on here because these are his own tweets. If people are watching his shows, they deserve to know exactly what kind of toxicity this person has been spreading online on social media and barring me from putting this out is censorship. That is what you are doing. ~2026-13620-11 (talk) 11:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been reverted by two other editors: Isi96 and KEmel49 apart from myself. I don't think you can accurately characterize a consensus against you as censorship. You should read WP:PRIMARY - you should be using secondary sources. PhilKnight (talk) 14:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Why not you open a discussion about your edit. Assume you haven't edited that page and you are starting a discussion of your thoughts about Mark Pellegrino's view on Palestine and it's addition to his wikipedia article. You can edit any wikipedia article but you must adhere to Rules and Regulations of wikipedia. We can't add any controversial section based on subjects own tweet, you have to cite any third party news article or something where it was mentioned. Go on and start a thread on Talk:Mark Pellegrino.––KEmel49(📝,📋) 17:52, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi KEmel49, thanks for your suggestion. I have just posted on the talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 01:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Fuck I messed that up really badly, and then my WiFi cut out before I could fix it and we edit conflicted. I'm going to let you handle this but it's a mess and I am so sorry about that. – LuniZunie_(talk) 04:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

This still needs revdel'ing. Again very sorry about that, should have just let the more powerful tools deal with the job... – LuniZunie_(talk) 04:37, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for all your hard work. PhilKnight (talk) 04:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

ANY TIME you feel like you need to extend/adjust a block I've made, feel free to do so. Joyous! Noise! 03:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello PhilKnight,

I'm a bot that helps log arbitration enforcement (AE) protection actions on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. As a result of a September 2025 motion by the Arbitration Committee, administrators are no longer required to manually log AE protection actions. Instead, this bot is responsible for logging AE protections to the AE protection log.

While logging AE protections, this bot detected that you recently took the following page protection actions. These action(s) seemed to be AE actions based on the edit summaries, but the bot wasn't able to tell which arbitration case they related to:

• 00:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC) (Iman Khatib-Yassin)

If these were AE actions, please take a moment to log the appropriate topic code at the AE protection log. If they were not, feel free to remove the actions from the AE protection log, and optionally let the bot operator know about the false positives.

Going forward, in order to help this bot categorize AE actions, please include a link to the contentious topic under which the action was taken in the protection edit summary (for example, [[WP:CT/BLP]] or [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Biographies of Living Persons]]).

If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to the bot operator or to the arbitration clerks at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard.

Thank you! ClerkBot (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for dealing with that user. Can I ask why it doesn't count as a sockpuppet block? I've been finding the user very problematic and was hoping to avoid WP:ANI so when I saw they were (mis)using two accounts to seemingly circumvent policy I hoped that might be an end to it! Orange sticker (talk) 09:28, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Orange sticker, sorry I should have explained. There is no overlap between the two accounts, so it's a case of a user creating a new account, which is allowed. PhilKnight (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah gotcha. Thanks! Orange sticker (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I mentioned you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuwintuwin as you were the one who blocked them. I believe they were unjustly unblocked. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 01:22, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

I, GuesanLoyalist, have been blocked from editing again due to editing with a VPN. I would not only like to be unblocked but to be given permission to edit from blocked IPs as I don't want to be blocked again.

My main reasons are because:

1. I use a VPN whenever I'm at school as certain sources would be blocked under certain reasons, so using one would help me still contribute to wikipedia.
2. I have been previously blocked before multiple times due to similar reasons, and they all have been repealed

And yes, I have contacted checkuser-en-wpwikipedia.org but I haven't received a response back as of March 2026.

Sincerely and politely

GuesanLoyalist (talk) 03:17, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm fairly sure that if you just disconnect from the VPN it should work again? aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 04:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Aesurias Thanks for the tip, I will utilise it if I can. GuesanLoyalist (talk) 08:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, User:MohamedMeiteKadir continued abuse of their user talk page , . I think editing of the user's talk page should be disabled. Thank you. MathXplore (talk) 06:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi MathXplore, thanks.  Done. PhilKnight (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2026 (UTC)