User talk:Alexius08
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thumbs up
 |
The Spamstar of Glory | |
| Presented to Alexius08 for getting rid of that spamming mess. Triplestop x3 02:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC) |
PayFrex
Hi Alexius08, I am writing to understand why you suspect that this wiki page warrants a speedy deletion. The content used in the page was a template and for other users to add/remove/change. I don't believe the wording nor the links are advertising this product or trying to sell this service. Please can you provide additional information so I can amend and create this page again?
Gary Brackett
Please roll back your edit to the Gary Brackett article. Link meets the a link qualifies as "an official page of the article's subject" per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_should_be_linked in addition to other criteria outlined on that page. Could possibly fit better at the bottom as an external link but this is not necessary imo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.182.50.148 (talk) 08:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Tōru Sakai
An article that you have been involved in editing, Tōru Sakai, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tōru Sakai. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andyzweb (talk) 11:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Arfana mallah
Hello Alexius08. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Arfana mallah, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 08:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Reverting vandalism
Speedy deletion declined: Mariwan Kanie
Hello Alexius08. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mariwan Kanie, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: popular author is an assertion of importance. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 14:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Joseph T Carew
Joseph Carew was founder of a large store. Why have you not queried the notability of Frank Woolworth???
Peter Lucas Plucas58 (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Joseph T. Carew
Hello Alexius08, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Joseph T. Carew - a page you tagged - because: Owner of a notable business indicates importance. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. decltype (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Tagging of Stanley Knowles School
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Stanley Knowles School. I do not think that Stanley Knowles School fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because stating that it is a school in a particular town is plenty of context for anyone who wished to do research on the subject, or to know what is begin covered. Please re-read the speedy deletion criteria. Thank you. I request that you consider not re-tagging Stanley Knowles School for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 22:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Tagging of Damago Soto
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Damago Soto. I do not think that Damago Soto fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "allegedly discovered the key to interpreting Aztec writings" is a clear claim of significance, it is even backed by a citation. The reliability of the source might be challenged at an AfD, and if kept the article should be expanded, but this is way beyond the bounds of a speedy.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Damago Soto for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Please remember that WP:CSD says "Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases." Please also read WP:CSD#Non-criteria. It may be that case that an article tagged for speedy deletion is evaluated by only two people, the tagger and the reviewing admin. Therefore both of these people must be extra cautious to tag/delete only clear cut cases. Speedy deletion bypasses consensus, so it is only acceptable in cases where there is pre-established consensus -- that is, the intentionally quite narrow criteria. Please keep this is mind in future. DES (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Tagging of Crosslight Software
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Crosslight Software. I do not think that Crosslight Software fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "pioneered the electrical and optical simulation of laser diodes in commercial TCAD product" is a claim of significance. I request that you consider not re-tagging Crosslight Software for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 23:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Please remember that A7 says "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source." and "If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion." Thank you. DES (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
editing power supply calculator
Hi, I added the calculator on the power supply page which you removed. The calculator is the best, most accurate and most up to date calculator in the internet so I have no idea why you removed it. It is absolutely free to use it, does the site look commercial? I dont understand, the other calculators linked are also highly commercial, extreme outervision for example, if you see this way. No idea why you want to keep this information from being published by deleting it. Help me understand please :) Regards (Prophetchris (talk) 01:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC))
Speedy deletion declined: Lmtb
Hello Alexius08. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lmtb, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Explain please?
Wikipedia Philippine Chapter in Philippine Youth Congress
I am glad to announce to you that we will be debuting as an organization at the Philippine Youth Congress in Information Technology on September 14 to 17, 2010 at the University of the Philippines, Diliman. Jojit will be Wikimedia Philippines resource speaker at the second day of the conference at the UP Film Center. He will be speaking about Wikipedia and how it revolutionizes the World Wide Web. That will be at 9:00 to 10:00 am. We will also set up a booth at the UP Bahay ng Alumni and we will showcase our existing and future projects. We encourage you to participate in our first major project. We have prepared food and refreshments for you. Please let us know so that we can enlist you to our delegation.--Exec8 (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the invitation. Actually, I went there on the first day together with my classmates and some of my professors. Too bad that Wiki's events were scheduled on the later days (although I've visited the booth). Sorry for the late reply. I've got too much stuff on my hands right now (various school projects, incoming final exams, etc.). Alexius08 (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Recent edit to Spratly Islands dispute
This recent edit, explained here puzzles me greatly on two counts.
- Prior to your edit the article asserted "One web site ... has said, 'Malaysian claim is presumably based ...'", citing a web page in support. You removed the supporting cite, leaving the quote unsupported, which seems to flout WP:V. (the cited web page actually didn't support the quote, but that's another issue)
- Your stated reason for the removal of the cite was essentially that it is your opinion that the source might be biased. This seems to flout WP:DUE. The cited web page didn't look biased to me at a quick look, but as I understand DUE, possible bias perceived by a WP editor on the part of a source considered generally reliable on the topic isn't an acceptable reason for censoring the viewpoint expressed by that source.
Anyhow, I've redone the subsection at issue to address the subsection topic more directly, citing a different source. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:04, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
Articles for Creation Appeal
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 2868 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
Would You like to Help?
Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the []. McKinseies (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Philippine WikiCon
An old AfD you contributed to
Could you have a new look, four years later, at OpenClinica LLC, formerly Akaza Research? --Orange Mike | Talk 16:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
AFC Backlog
| Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2868 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. |
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2868 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
News
|
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU
- Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 08:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles for creation needs YOUR help!
Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2868 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
|
.png){kind=logo}
