User talk:Anne drew

		The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
		For outstanding work reviewing the bridge article, and helping it become what it is. Noleander (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Noleander! I appreciate it. And congrats on the FA! Anne drew (talk · contribs) 17:02, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		Thank you for your Veracity. I have just used it to generate a wikitable on my homewiki for review. It lists items in a clear, well-organized way, saving me from the tedious task of source review and making the process somehow enjoyable. Additionally, I don't have much experience with spot-checking, so this script is a huge help to me. Although I'm not active on English Wikipedia, I have noticed that you are actively involved in review process. Thank you for your admirable contributions and your willingness to share writing experiences! --𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝙴𝚊𝚌𝚑 ... 𝙽𝚎𝚡𝚝 22:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, For Each ... Next! I'm so glad you found Veracity useful. Happy reviewing! Anne drew (talk · contribs) 18:51, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Small suggestion: the tool now outputs the following text This table checks 4 passages from .... . I always change it to read This table lists 4 random passages from .... . (a) added word "random"; (b) change "checks" to "lists" since that seems more precise especially when the table is initially created. No big deal, but if you think these changes would clarify things for users, consider using these changes. Great tool!!! Noleander (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Good ideas, Noleander! I've updated the text. I see you're working on the Nile next. Another ambitious project - good luck! Anne drew (talk · contribs) 01:01, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, can I ask for your thoughts on Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/March 2026 proposal? There's some discussion on its talk and at WT:AIC#AI-bot on ANI Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 17:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Loving Veracity tool. Using it now at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Splatoon_3:_Side_Order/archive1#Source_review_by_Noleander. The "Status" column is key: it is where I'm recording pass/fail as I go thru the rows. I use green/red for the pass/fail (in addition to changing "?" text to pass/fail). All good: but the default value in that column is ? ... so the red color means "unknown" as well as "Fail". Suggestion: change the default "?" color to blue, black, or grey, ... (anything other than red) e.g.

• ?
• ?
• ?

Just a thought. Noleander (talk) 23:47, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey Noleander, nice to hear from you! I see your point. The options you provided could work, but some of them don't stand out in the same way, and '''{{blue|?}}''' adds a bit of wikitext clutter which I'd like to avoid. What about an hourglass emoji (⏳), indicating a pending status? Anne drew (talk · contribs) 03:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Hourglass is fine ... the goal is to avoid the red coloration. Noleander (talk) 03:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done! Anne drew (talk · contribs) 03:41, 21 March 2026 (UTC)