User talk:TheHelpfulJelp

Hello, I'm Oshawott 12. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Bernie Madoff have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 07:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

what are you talking about Anti-Trumpism (talk) 23:15, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Pipe058. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Business career of Donald Trump seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 20:40, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Anti-Trumpism", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to advocate a certain point of view. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Category:RMS Titanic survivors did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! ^SMason_Garrison 16:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize[correction: use AI on] Wikipedia, as you did at Reactions to the death of Michael Jackson, you may be blocked from editing. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 19:48, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm very sorry for my actions. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 20:03, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Oops, my bad. I did not mean to send you a vandalization notice and I apologize for that. That was supposed to be a warning for AI use, and I would like to ask you to stop submitting AI generated articles. This is creating a lot of work for others to clean it up, and I am worried that you might get blocked if you continue. According to the WP:NEWLLM we are not allowed to use AI to edit English Wikipedia.

Again, I am sorry for accidentally sending you the wrong warning. I did not mean to accuse you of vandalism, but could you please stop using AI on Wikipedia? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 20:10, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

To add to what Gurkubondinn said -- TheHelpfulJelp, Wikipedia is dealing with a barrage of AI-generated articles on a daily basis. They often contain factual errors and thus undermine our effort to produce a reliable encyclopedia. We can be quite forgiving, though -- we would love for you to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, without the assistance of LLM tools. There are plenty of helpful humans around who can help you with formatting, copyedits, etc... Robots are just not needed. If you have questions about editing, you can find help at the Teahouse. Cheers, MediaKyle (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I didn't AI-generate anything, I promise. I get information from sources. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I think that you should read the WP:NOAILIARS essay. Like MediaKyle said, we can be a pretty forgiving bunch. We can quite easily tolerate mistake and we actively want people to learn from their mistakes and become productive contributors to the project. But you will need to be honest, admit to your mistakes, do better, and then we will move on. But we are WP:NOTDUMB, and it tends to go poorly for people that lie. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I know y'all aren't dumb. I wasn't saying y'all are dumb. I love Wikipedia deeply, and I never want to vandalize the website. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

We are not talking about vandalism (that was my mistake, I selected the wrong notice earlier). We are talking about you using AI to generate articles, submitting them to Wikipedia, and then saying that you didn't AI-generate anything when you were asked to stop. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:11, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I didn't mean to do that. That was messed up. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 21:20, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

It actually seems like you actually copied most of the text from Death of Michael Jackson, according to what Jumpytoo has pointed out in the AfD discussion. Could you please clarify how you created the article, and where the text comes from? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Um, I copied the text. It was stupid for me to fucking do. Why did I do that? Shit. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I was also stupid for lying. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Great, thank you and apology accepted. Just please don't use AI on Wikipedia again or make unattributed copies, there are a lot of other things that I would like to spend my time on than stuff like this. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 22:17, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

See the most recent topic... They immediately did it again. Not too impressed. MediaKyle (talk) 22:18, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Well I'll be damned (for the second time). --Gurkubondinn (talk) 22:22, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Template:Human rights in North Korea did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! ^SMason_Garrison 20:53, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi TheHelpfulJelp! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Adam Lanza. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Adam Lanza, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Category:Aftermath of the Titanic has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! I appreciate your enthusiasm in making Titanic content but I suggest you should start with drafts first and also, given you seem to be taking the content from another page (which is perfectly fine if you are), you should also put in WHERE you got the information from. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, I wanted to help. Anti-Trumpism (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

And that is fine! I love the enthusiasm a lot! But you might run into trouble; I have done similar things so I thought I should give you a bit of heads up! Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:24, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

So I took a look at your forks, and you did a pretty good job with them! Well done! I would suggest those are more than enough for the sinking article itself. Any further would lead to overlaps since there are quite a few articles on the topic already in existance.

I would say that you work on referencing them as best as you can and also add where you got the info from in the edit summaries. It's fine that you didn't this time but something to keep in mind for the future. And, for the near future, you can use Draftspace so you can work on articles slowly and so they can be checked to see if they are ready for the mainspace.

Hope you have a good day! :) Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, TheHelpfulJelp,

Thank you for creating Reactions to the sinking of the Titanic.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article is written like a sensationalist essay, newspaper or magazine feature, in a tone inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, TheHelpfulJelp,

Thank you for creating Aftermath of the Titanic disaster.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article is written like a sensationalist essay, newspaper or magazine feature, in a tone inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:26, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, TheHelpfulJelp,

Thank you for creating Timeline of the sinking of the Titanic.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

In the format of this article, every time in the timeline is a statement requiring an individual source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Aftermath of the Titanic disaster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. MediaKyle (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Reactions to the sinking of the Titanic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. MediaKyle (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 22:48, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the death of Michael Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the death of Michael Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

--Gurkubondinn (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Criticism of North Korea. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:59, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

It doesn't. I learned my lesson. The only mistake was that I forgot to make it a draft. TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Backwards long jump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backwards long jump until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

TarkusAB^talk/contrib 03:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otto Frank, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

no they were, the frank family was stateless what do you expect TheHelpfulJelp (talk) 20:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Category:Guinness World Records holders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 07:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)