User talk:Antor2004

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nabiganj Upazila—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Saptadingar Guptodhon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ednabrenze (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Antor2004. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saptadingar Guptodhon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Antor2004. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Saptadingar Guptodhon".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:30, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Get ready to join Wikipedia’s 25th birthday party at 16:00 UTC, or come a bit early and get warmed up at the pre-party countdown starting at 15:45 UTC!

You can tune in on the Wikimedia Foundation website, where the party will be available in six languages – Arabic, Chinese, French, English, Portuguese and Spanish. https://wikimediafoundation.org/wikipedia25/birthday-celebration

You also have the option of streaming on Wikipedia’s YouTube channel, though that channel will be only available in English. https://www.youtube.com/live/C5rPmv27YzY

See you soon!

You received this message because you registered for Wikipedia’s 25th birthday celebration. https://w.wiki/HPGi

Chris Koerner (WMF) (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Suvarna Banik, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Ok I will try Antor2004 (talk) 13:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ekdalian (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

all are the Family members of sabarna Banik like me Antor Banik born in Bangladesh they have more contribution as a professor of respected university they deserve to be on that list. Look at the list of Chatterjee Ganguly you will find actors and all .I gave all references if the founder of isckon can be member of sabarna banik than they can be there Antor2004 (talk) 18:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Haven't you read the notice above; you are not supposed to edit any article on caste until you become an extended confirmed user! You have violated the same by editing the article on Suvarna Banik. Further violation may result in a ban, block, etc. Please treat this as a warning. Ekdalian (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Antor. Did you not understand Ekdalian's warning about 500 edits being required for editing about caste and social groups? You don't have 500 edits; you only currently have 172 edits. You can't ignore Wikipedia's rules no matter how much you believe particular people deserve to be on some list. You keep editing Suvarna Banik, which is an article about a caste. Telling Ekdalian in this edit summary that "you are not Banik" is completely irrelevant to Wikipedia's rules about who may edit particular articles. If you edit Subarna Banik or any other caste article again before you have 500 edits, you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 15:16, 4 February 2026 (UTC).