User talk:Arandomfolk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nomination of Gareth Damian Martin for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth Damian Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.11WB (talk) 10:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- I've withdrawn this. I don't think the individual is notable, and the article will likely remain as a WP:PERMASTUB, but I don't have the time nor the energy to argue the point. Especially not when it is likely the article will be kept anyway. This is a procedural concession. Remember to WP:AGF and happy editing! 11WB (talk) 13:10, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- I fail to understand why you conclude that the article will be kept if you believe Damian Martin isn't notable, since WP:AFDEQ explicitly states that “while AfD may look like a voting process, it does not operate like one. Justification and evidence for a response carries far more weight than the response itself.”
- And I do AGF regarding the nomination as AFD, but please understand how your behavior made it hard for me to keep AGF about the way you answered (or didn't) Kelob2678's comment and mine. Arandomfolk (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter what I think now. I conceded. This is what I was trying to avoid by closing the AfD. I'm not going to be drawn into a long discussion about this. You demonstrated the individual is notable, that's where the discussion ends. There is nothing further to say. 11WB (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)