User talk:Asianeditorz

Hello, Asianeditorz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 03:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abraham Fulfilled: A Biblical Study of Gods Plan for Ishmael and Arabia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:09, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

The article Abraham Fulfilled: A Biblical Study of Gods Plan for Ishmael and Arabia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't find any evidence that this book is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kajmer05 (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abraham. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 12:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Global Da'wah Council. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and YouTube as the sole source on an article is not appropriate, it needs additional sourcing in order to demonstrate notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sirah of the Prophet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sirah of the Prophet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Asianeditorz. Thank you for your work on Mir Yar Baloch. Another editor, Moritoriko, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

no copy-vio, because its a redirect

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moritoriko}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Moritoriko (talk) 05:51, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Ahmed al-Sharaa appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Don't make disruptive move requests on Ahmed al-Sharaa. Sources using "Ahmad" instead of "Ahmed" on the term of Ahmed al-Sharaa are a minority viewpoint. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 09:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Yerlo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Interim government of Bangladesh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yerlo (talk) 14:31, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

It was a mistake A$ianeditorz (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello! User:Asianeditorz, Please try adding more well researched content to expand the Raj Shamani page. Sections like early life, career milestones, major achievements, and media coverage under WP:SIGCOV would be helpful. Make sure to use reliable and verifiable sources to support each claim. This will improve the chances of the article being accepted into mainspace. Let me know if you need help! 🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 07:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Asianeditorz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Global Da'wah Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Asianeditorz. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Global Da'wah Council".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Asianeditorz. I just wanted to comment on your recent edits, to perhaps clarify some things. The page Interim government of Nepal (disambiguation) is a disambiguation page, and thus shouldn't be an actual article. Instead, it simply links to other articles. Karki interim cabinet doesn't fall under WP:G11, since that is supposed to be used for advertising/promotion. Instead, I have tagged it under WP:G6, in order to make way for a page move. Hopefully this clarifies some things. Happy editing :) 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:32, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Actually it was about the form of interim government of Nepal not (disambiguation) a user messed up A$ianeditorz (talk) 00:35, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

We already have a page for the events, its Sushila Karki ministry, no? 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:42, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

All that page is about is the current interim government. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:43, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

@PenGear:, this discussion does partially involve you, pinging to notify. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Actually those both are different the Sushila Karki ministry is about her cabinet and members ministries under her govt their roles and the Interim government of Sushila Karki is about her tenure as pm what events took place during her govt the incitive she took the developments she did and the bilateral diplomatic affairs etc. A$ianeditorz (talk) 00:53, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

I don't see a point of an separate Interim government of Nepal page specifically for this cabinet when we will have a page for her interim cabinet. There would be significant overlap between them. Since Nepal has had five interim governments a disambiguation page makes the most sense imo. Interim Government of Nepal Interim government of (Nepal), Interim government (Nepal) could refer to any one of the five interim governments. This one might seem the most significant because of recency bias, but they were equally important during their time. PenGear (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

If it's a system/form of govt existed before then their should be a separate page detailed about the system/form of govt in Nepal and yeah there can be a distinguishing page simultaneously but it doesn't talk about the whole system, how it works in Nepal in all together. Hope you understood. A$ianeditorz (talk) 06:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

No I don't. That doesn't make any sense at all. Any extra powers of the current interim government should just be in the page for the cabinet. There does not need to be another page for it. PenGear (talk) 06:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Asianeditorz. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! 204.111.137.20 (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interim Government of Nepal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interim Government of Nepal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 05:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Interim Government of Nepal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because WP:Articles for deletion/Interim Government of Nepal. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Left guide (talk) 05:13, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Asianeditorz

I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Kuruluş: Orhan season 2, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 24 § Kuruluş: Orhan season 2.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:31, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Asianeditorz. Thank you for your work on Kuruluş: Osman season 7. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nothing about a 7th season is mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:36, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman beylik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beylik. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Interoperable Instant Payment System, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Bro AP omer Faruk Aran aur dosra jitna Bhi actor hain Kuruluş Orhan Ka Jin ka page NHI bany howa hain bana di teen char actor he hain AH Editz (talk) 10:02, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Okay I will try. A$ianeditorz (talk) 11:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gen Z Revolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gen Z Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

―Howard • 🌽³³ 16:17, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bozdağ Film. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kuruluş: Orhan season 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ala al-Din Ali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ekaki (2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it is not notable. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 16:23, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Asianeditorz, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Asianeditorz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 16:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

I have doing this type of edits and page creation for few months. No I was not paid for anything. And if I were I have no problem telling that. But I don't do paid edits. All are done voluntarily A$ianeditorz (talk) 16:37, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. .

You must also stop your disruptive recreation of articles that have been moved to draftspace. bonadea contributions talk 16:36, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

I have disclosed. I don't do paid edits. A$ianeditorz (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Can I continue editing? A$ianeditorz (talk) 16:51, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to The 9/11 Files. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 16:26, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ekaki (3). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it is still not notable, and the repeated recreations are disruptive. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 16:35, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raj Shamani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Shamani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CreepMentis (talk) 18:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Asianeditorz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mir Yar Baloch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Please explain why and how you decided to move this page and its article counterpart to the wrong intended page? You may reply here or on the talk page. Thanks. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 01:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

I've reverted my counter move for now and will be starting a move review. Feel free to discuss it here. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 03:57, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a Move review of Constitutional Declaration of the Syrian Arab Republic. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 04:17, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamail Nadwi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamail Nadwi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kingsacrificer (talk) 19:37, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Draft:Ekaki (2). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:Ekaki. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:Ekaki. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:Ekaki|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Media Mender (chat, stalk) 11:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ekaki (3) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

a recently created article with no relevant page history that does not expand upon, detail, or improve information within the existing article(s) on the subject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Media Mender (chat, stalk) 11:24, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Shamail Nadwi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KnowMosaic (talk) 12:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Asianeditorz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yükseliş Orhan: A Father's Dream, A Son's Legacy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 18th Jatiya Sangsad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 17th Jatiya Sangsad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 16th Jatiya Sangsad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Please don't create articles with no content; wait until you actually have some information to put into an article before creating it. JBW (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 13th Jatiya Sangsad, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Re: Parliament of bangladesh. This is too important a subject for such a poor article. Please use the Wikipedia:Article wizard and get the capitalisation right. It should be noted that at present you don't have consensus for creating this article at all, since more than one person has reverted you, but by creating a draft you will very likely be able to get it. • a frantic turtle 🐢 17:13, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah I was about edit more to make it perfect. Okay I will publish it with completion. A$ianeditorz (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oath of office ceremony of Tarique Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oath of office ceremony of Tarique Rahman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QEnigma 论 11:36, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 14th Jatiya Sangsad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

The article Mohammed Selim Uddin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a non-notable politician show stood for a notable position but lost.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. KylieTastic (talk) 10:45, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Why can't we use list numbers? If those who have performed more responsibilities are not considered as a separate council, then Sheikh Hasina's four consecutive ministries should not be considered as separate. Kırmızı süleyman (talk) 07:22, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Check them again the ministries which was continued more for consecutive terms are considered one also the advisory. A$ianeditorz (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

On 26 January I asked you not to keep creating empty articles. OK, you haven't done so, which is fine; thank you. However, you have continued to create other empty pages. Please don't. \you don't need to be told about every possible variation of some unhelpful action; if you keep doing things essentially similar to things which you have been asked not to do, you may find it leads to problems. JBW (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

I didn't get it which pages you mean any examples? A$ianeditorz (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

There are 7 of them here. JBW (talk) 13:21, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

These are just talk page. A$ianeditorz (talk) 13:41, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Era of Polycrisis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Era of Polycrisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era of Polycrisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JBW (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2026 (UTC)