User talk:Astrashatra

August 2025

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Loveleen Kaur Sasan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:23, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tata Steel. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NewsRx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Current affairs. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narender Nannapuneni (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Narender Nannapuneni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 03:49, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Astrashatra! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Snowycats (talk) 03:49, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Suggest that you join the Indian politics wikiproject

You'll find a long list of articles to fix at . -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:16, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Banoth Shankar Nayak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Banoth Shankar Nayak. Thanks! ChrysGalley (talk) 19:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Banoth Shankar Nayak has been accepted

Banoth Shankar Nayak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 20:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Article 371J of the Constitution of India did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Moved draft

Hi, you had submitted your userpage User:Astrashatra as article draft; please don't do that. I've moved the content into a correcty-titled page in the draft space; you can now find it at Draft:Gaddigari Vittal Reddy. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

You have again submitted your userpage as draft. One more time: please do not do that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:04, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Accuracy??

much of the information in this draft does not seem accurate. a google of this man shows he was suspended and removed for workplace bullying. he subsequently appealed the suspension as well. so the claim that he resigned seems incorrect. McCIrishman (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manu Sawhney (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drew Stanley was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While the person may be notable (sources still need improvement), the article is unreadable as is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manu Sawhney and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drew Stanley (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Manu Sawhney! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drew Stanley (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Manu Sawhney has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manu Sawhney. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Reddy

As an elected member of the state legislative assembly, he definitely meets notability criteria; however, your reference #1 is badly broken. Once you've fixed that, I'll approve the draft. DS (talk) 20:31, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Patlolla Kishta Reddy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Patlolla Kishta Reddy. Thanks! ChrysGalley (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patlolla Kishta Reddy has been accepted

Patlolla Kishta Reddy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Blocked

As you are continuing to create draft articles on your User page, despite multiple prior warnings, I have now blocked you indefinitely. WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. Any admin is free to lift your block without consulting me if you firmly commit to creating articles in the Draft namespace and then submitting them for review, as described at WP:AFC, and firmly commit to immediately ceasing your inappropriate use of your User page for this. --Yamla (talk) 12:49, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Karnataka Gram Panchayath election (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HurricaneZeta were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Overuse of [citation needed] tags - a new draft that intends to be accepted should not have that much, and in my opinion shouldn't have even one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 Karnataka Gram Panchayath election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HurricaneZeta^C 23:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaddigari Vittal Reddy has been accepted

Gaddigari Vittal Reddy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Mothe Srilatha Reddy was on your user page

That page is now empty. This draft will only move forwards when either:

You negotiate the lifting of your block
Another editor adopts it

Otherwise it will be deleted automagically in six months. The blocking administrator has indicated that they are happy to hear from you. I suggest you reply above and deploy {{Reply to|Yamla}} in your message. Do not forget to sign it, and copy it exactly as it displays in this message. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:56, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles