User talk:AstroidXD02

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Namibia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yue💌 21:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

ok Thank you for informing me i will surely not make this mistake again AstroidXD02 (talk) 04:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NXcrypto Message 08:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bangladesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aazaru. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maldives have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.--Aazaru (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to the article Japan. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 05:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 05:49, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2025 Syrian coup d'etat attempt. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 03:56, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 17:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

What are you talking about? AstroidXD02 (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense 🌈 论 16:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm going to state this very clearly for likely the last time, since I've said it several times before: articles are not generally required to use any particular template, like {{native name}}, just because that template is in use on other comparable articles. There is no real problem if an article like Germany uses that template in its infobox or not, and when such choices don't make a real difference, it's best to minimize disruption by letting things stay as they are. It's a really bad habit on here to edit war over deeply trivial matters like that. If you keep edit warring instead of engaging in discussions, you're likely to get blocked for disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 16:04, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

i didnt remove anything from there i Just Added the Language Name (German) and nothing else because that Name is written In German AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

and another thing is that Native name includes the language name while lang didnt show the Name of the Language because of that i edited that AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

I know what the template does. It's not necessary to use it on France, as one example, and we are not required to use it. People generally know French is the official language in France, and such countries are cases where the template has the least purpose, and essentially just takes up space for no good reason.

On the other hand, the {{native name}} template is particularly useful to use on articles about states with multiple official languages, or states whose official language isn't common knowledge. It is a case-by-case decision. We don't have to use exactly the same tools on every article of a kind. Remsense 🌈 论 16:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

I saw Brazil's Article it also includes (lang) Even tho everyone did not Know Brazil's Official Language another Exmaple Is Austria and their Official Language Is German so is its not necessary that everyone knowns the language name AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

My primary point is it doesn't matter that much either way, so the norm (WP:RETAIN) in all such cases is to leave it alone, because otherwise there is fighting back and forth over non-issues instead of substantial improvements. If you aren't going to engage with this point, I can't force you, but I can only phrase it so many ways before it seems you don't care about listening to myself or others. Remsense 🌈 论 17:10, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

It does not need to be used. Moreover, like I said directly above, it is generally disruptive to impose it on articles where it isn't already used without a particular reason or the agreement of others. Remsense 🌈 论 16:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

You do not seem to understand that reverting others over and over is not how we make progress on here, though others have tried to communicate this to you. You continue to refuse to discuss disputes with others. If you keep making unhelpful reverts while ignoring the concerns other editors have with your edits, I'm going to ask at WP:ANI that you be blocked, because your editing so far is far too disruptive. Remsense 🌈 论 16:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Both primary and third party sources refers to Laos as a people's democratic state. For example

• Lao official: Our goal is to strengthen the people’s democratic state
• The 11th Plenary Session of the sitting Central Committee of the Lao People's Revolutionary Party: strengthen the people's democratic state
• Article 2 of the Laotian constitution: "The State of the Lao People's Democratic Republic is a people's democratic state."
• This is also sourced by third party sources in the section "Classification" of the People's Democracy article.
• In accordance with Historical materialism not everything can, by definition, be socialist. It is based on specific base and superstructural relations. read the articles on the national democratic state, people's democratic and the socialist state (communism) for more information.

TheUzbek (talk) 11:35, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Australia, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 16:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Ok tell me what is my mistake? And give proper reasons AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Please stop making undiscussed edits to orthographic maps and changing them to lower quality ones as you've done at Algeria, Australia, Brazil, Iraq, and Libya. Skitash (talk) 16:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

As iam a new editor so I don't know much about this website so Yeah probably that was Just a mistake AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Swedish officials do not use numbers like X-th Prime Minister. The office that Ulf Kristersson holds is just Prime Minister of Sweden, not 35th Prime Minister of Sweden. Sjö (talk) 15:00, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

ah well sorry for my mistake nevermind. AstroidXD02 (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Please avoid linking common words and/or phrases (and repeated linking of uncommon ones) - see MOS:OVERLINK. Edwardx (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

what do you mean by that I can't understand explain it more properly and accurately AstroidXD02 (talk) 15:47, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Just click on the link MOS:OVERLINK that @Edwardx provided for you and read it. If you can't understand it because of a lack of English proficiency, you probably shouldn't be editing the English Wikipedia. CodeTalker (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Honestly idc because i was doing those edits just to get extended Confirmed user since now i get it i won't even goona do it again lol. AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. CodeTalker (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

For the record, per this ANI post, I've revoked AstroidXD02's XC status which was reached by self-admitted gaming. Once the user makes 100 meaningful and useful edits, they may request the status to be reinstated, either by pinging me or asking any administrator. Needless to say, any further blatant gaming will not be appreciated. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey I have completed 100 edits useful and meaningful edits as you said and now restore my EC Status i have done my job. AstroidXD02 (talk) 10:20, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Have you? I couldn't confirm few, the population density of Denmark seems wrong. Doug Weller Doug Weller talk 13:58, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

That's not the point my point is return my ec status just tell me are you returning it or not. First of all it's totally unfair according to rules you need 500 edits + 1 month old account and i have them both but because of some of my mistakes you take it from me now i have done the work that you said but you still not returning my ec status its unfair AstroidXD02 (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

It is completely fair according to the rules at WP:PGAME and WP:XC. It is reasonable that, since you previously made trivial edits to get permissions, you should have to justify or demonstrate why these last 100 edits were useful. By my count, after omitting reverted edits, you're at 91, not 100. Other, more subtle issues may also be present. (E.g., the Poland citation lacking an access date which made it not useful to verify, as the number changes very frequently, updates to population figures such as this where you changed a ranking without a source, and here where you reverted an soured update to figures without explanation.) EducatedRedneck (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Fine just tell me if you don't wanna give stop making these excuses AstroidXD02 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

@EducatedRedneck can’t give it back as they aren’t an Administrator. I am an Admin and do not see why you should have it back. I’m not even sure why you need it. Also the warnings above are a big concern. Doug Weller talk 16:39, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Fine Man Iam leaving this iam just tired of you guys specially admins and random ppl I've worked 1 or 2 years in this site but everytime i got nothing but headache iam just tired of you guys i can't explain anymore Its upto you I've already said to forgive my past mistakes and restore my EC status but they've said to make 100 edits so I've also do that. But still you guy's complains didn't ended at last i wanna say it again and lastly its upto you know that you wanna restore it or now I've already did my job.so now its totally upto you admin guys that you wanna restore or not. AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luther Duncan, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Auburn and Russellville were added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

You have changed to population density rank data in the infoboxes of dozens of articles without a scintilla of supporting evidence. Even an edit summary would have been a start. This way of editing is WP: disruptive.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:59, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

These population density ranking changes are worse than useless. You have provided no clue as to where you got these new figures, so some other editor(s) are going to need to go through all your changes and evaluate them to decide whether they are correct. Can you explain where you got these new rankings from? If you have a source, please go back and add a reference to all the articles that you changed. If you just invented these figures without consulting any source, you have created a complete waste of time for other editors, so please go back and revert your changes. You should do one or the other of these things to show that you are editing in good faith and not just doing more busywork to gain permissions.

Also, some of your recent changes are demonstrably incorrect, such as your edit to Guyana where you changed the population density in km2 without changing the density in mi2, so that the two values now disagree. You did the same thing in your edits to South Sudan and Republic of the Congo. You should also repair the damage that you've done to these articles. CodeTalker (talk) 16:56, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

the source of population density is Wikipedia itself and another thing is don't you think you are too disrespectful? I haven't said anything yet so yeah AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

You think you can use our articles as sources? Doug Weller talk 17:35, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

bruh i never said i use them as a source i just took ranking from there and also no one uses source and reference for adding ranks AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

1. That’s not true.

2. If there were no sources, would that be a problem? Doug Weller talk 18:28, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 1 month for Adding unsourced CIR issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 21:11, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

You can still edit article talk pages. Doing that constructively will help you. Doug Weller talk 21:13, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Let me tell you why iam forcing you guys to return my EC first of all there are several pages in Wikipedia where you need EC to edit pages like pakistan india or russia etc and there are many things i wanna edit there like gdp things etc and i also have references for them like imf . But you guys are misunderstanding me that i would make useless edits all that stuff etc. AstroidXD02 (talk) 05:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

and also in past i edited many countries gdp like Nigeria Bangladesh Iraq and others AstroidXD02 (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

You appear to have a problem with English. You aren't "forcing " anyone, you are arguing with us. Doug Weller talk 09:50, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

No you are the one who is arguing AstroidXD02 (talk) 10:31, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

you are misusing of your admin powers AstroidXD02 (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

And also let's end this stuff here and tell me what i have to do so i get my status back AstroidXD02 (talk) 10:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

No you are the one who is arguing Say that again but slowly.

tell me what i have to do so i get my status back This was already done above. To elaborate, go to the talk pages of the articles you want to edit, and make WP:EDITREQUESTs, of the WP:CHANGEXY form. If you do this a while and amass a portfolio of good edit requests, it'll be much easier to appeal the unblock, which can be done as described in the above linked WP:GAB. I hope this clarifies things. EducatedRedneck (talk) 14:50, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Bruh im not talking about unblocking because for now iam not goona be active as much as before in this site so it really doesn't matter much to me that my id is banned for 1 month that's fine after 1 month i would make edits again if needed but my point is extended confirm status how do i get it AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Same as I said above. Also, why would you want extended confirmed status if you can't make edits to articles anyway? If you can't answer that question, I wouldn't expect you to be given WP:XC status. EducatedRedneck (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Bruh don't you get it as i said earlier that iam not goona make edits for 1 month anyway.And i also can't make it even tho if i wanted tho cause you have banned me. So what iam saying is that give me extended confirm so that when i get unbanned i can make edits again. That's my point. AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

And also i will not goona make spam edits any longer or in future as well AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

You can edit article talk pages.Do a good job of that and you will probably get EC back. Doug Weller talk 17:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

i can't do that cause iam not that good at English and also English is not my first language AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

That being the case, you cannot be expected to edit constructively in English. Perhaps it would be best to edit a version of Wikipedia written in your first language.Thanks. -- the former admin Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

How would it benifit me? AstroidXD02 (talk) 09:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Be careful you don't add extra space that I've removed here Logoshimpo (talk) 03:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! I noticed your recently update the rankings for dozen of Article. While I appreciate the effort to keep the information current, Wikipedia requires all rankings and statistics to be backed by reliable sources to ensure verifiability.Do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Could you please provide a citation or link to where these new figures came from? Otherwise, they may need to be reverted to maintain the article's accuracy.Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia" Joshua🇵🇭🙏 Joshuaatag (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Just revert it man iam banned for 1 month AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh. --Yamla (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 13:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

I haven't even did anything yet I made a single edit. Why did you blocked me from editing? And also i was blocked for 1 month for those edits already I've already got my punishment then why did you block me again?? AstroidXD02 (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

And here above he said If I did anything like this again then I would get blocked but since then I haven't made a single edit yet so why did you block me?? AstroidXD02 (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

A given level warning on your talk page is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. Administrator discretion is a thing, and where one administrator is willing to give a warning, another may feel that a line has been crossed. I have seen this several times when I have given a user a warning and another admin has then blocked them even though the user had not edited again. I have no complaint about that and have accepted the blocks as a reasonable response to the behavior. Please take the period in which you are blocked to consider why you have been blocked and how you can avoid the behavior that led to the block when the block has ended and you can return to editing. Donald Albury 15:08, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Iam honestly trired with Wikipedian admins im taking retirement from Wikipedia and goona quit it from here now. AstroidXD02 (talk) 15:17, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 19:18, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok i accept that those edits were disruptive and related to vandalism but i understand my fault and mistakes and i won't do that ever again. And also i want to do a fresh start and yeah i won't do such behavior again so can you give me a Second chance, please. AstroidXD02 (talk) 03:17, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

You need to make a proper appeal as described above to see if another Admin will grant your request. Doug Weller talk 10:26, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AstroidXD02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I've Understand My Fault that ive created many disruptive and edits related to vandalism and i ask for an apology and wanted to do a fresh start and i would never goona do this mistake again so i kindly ask you to Please Unblock my account. AstroidXD02 (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am deeply concerned that you skill with English is not quite at the level needed to be able to contribute here and communicate your thoughts to us. To unblock you, we need to know that you understand what was wrong with your prior edits and what steps you will take to not repeat them. This request doesn't do that. I again suggest that you edit the Wikipedia of your primary language. 331dot (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is English the main language that you use to communicate? 331dot (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

No English is not my first language — Preceding unsigned comment added by AstroidXD02 (talk • contribs)

You may feel more comfortable editing the Wikipedia of your primary language. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the premier Wikipedia. The Wikipedia of your primary language likely needs the help more than we do. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

atleast unblock my account man. A AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

i accept my past mistakes AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Bruh. First of all i Don't edit pages i mostly edit gdps population estimates rankings etc so i Don't have to be that good in English anyway and i already have that knowledge AstroidXD02 (talk) 03:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Except you unnecessarily add significant figures to numbers without explanation and consistently introduce the same English-language typos to data in infoboxes, like not learning after several warnings and hundreds of edits that "2nd" is not a typo but "2th" is (example of you changing 2nd to 2th just before your block). The unseriousness of your responses demonstrate to me that you have no idea what you're apologising and accepting fault for. Yue🌙 (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Nope i got a warning after i made that edit.but suddenly a admin blocked me for 3 months then your another so called admin blocked me permanently.and also i just made a single edit after i got unbanned after a 1 month ban. And after that i also apologise for my mistakes but instead. From where but you guys got that language thing what it has to do with this I don't even edit that. And yeah that ranking was an mistake ok i accept that. AstroidXD02 (talk) 03:00, 23 March 2026 (UTC)