User talk:Benefac

Hi! You have to make a bookmark. Instead of putting into the bookmark an URL, you put the script. It's a nice feature of modern internet browsers, so you can create bookmarks that run scripts - they are called Bookmarklets. I have added a "How to use the script" section to the page. I should have made such a section from the beginning. Please tell me if it can help you to create the bookmarklet. If you have any questions, please ask me - it will help me to make the script more user-friendly. Also, if the script doesn't work well with a particular newspaper article, please let me know it. Sometimes the script might not capture the publication date or the author name. That's because some newspaper use more than one formatting style or they simply change the way they publish those fields. Therefore I have to update the script sometimes. Thanks. —  Ark25  (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

This is much easier than having to surf to another URL (you would have to make a bookmark for that URL anyways). You click the bookmarklet just like clicking any bookmark and you get the formatted reference. I have no idea where can I save my script in a website - that would be more complicated to use and would require me to modify the script. Although it would help the users to have an idea what the script does and how it works. —  Ark25  (talk) 00:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks! I'll try it out when I have time. I did a couple test runs just now, on HuffPost and WSJ. Here's what I got: for HuffPost^[1], and for WSJ^[2]. It didn't grab the author, but not bad! :-) Tks again. Benefac (talk) 19:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

I updated the script for Huffington^[3] and I added WSJ^[4] - although I only tested this single link for WSJ.

If you want to title case the author name (transform "CAROLYN THOMPSON" into "Carolyn Thompson", then change the var AuthorNameTitleCase = "No"; into var AuthorNameTitleCase = "Yes";). It will work most of the time, sometimes it will not do it correctly if the author name is too complicated - it will make it like "Carolyn thompson" or so). Thanks for feedback :) —  Ark25  (talk) 21:28, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! Btw, I'm not familiar with corresponding on Wikipedia. Do you get notified when I reply to your comment in my own Talk page? (I suppose only if you choose to Watch my talk page?) Is the norm that I reply to you here, to keep a single thread, or that I go comment in your Talk page? (The latter would be rather disjointed, I'd think.) Tks again! Benefac (talk) 23:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for late answer. Yes, that's the best way to make conversations, on a single thread. I do not get notified but I can see that you edited this page in my watchlist. If you want to notify me, then add {{u|Ark25}} and then I get a notification. It's a new and very nice feature to let someone know that you replied to them or to invite someone to join a conversation or to let them know that you talk about them. In this case it's not really needed, I am supposed to check if you replied to me in your own user talkpage. I will put a {{u|Benefac}} on a talk page to invite you to make comments there :) —  Ark25  (talk) 22:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

By the way, if you have any beginner questions, don't hesitate to ask me. I'll try to be helpful. There is also a whole project for such things. —  Ark25  (talk) 23:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Benefac. I am just letting you know that I deleted Tough Cookie, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. GedUK  12:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shooting of John Crawford III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beavercreek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks you for your work improving and cleaning up the John Crawford III article. Currently I'm trying to do the same with the Shooting of Akai Gurley article and I'd love you to take a look at it. Artw (talk) 21:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your thorough defense of keeping the article. This is why I work on Wikipedia: to learn.--Aichik (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your excellent writing and edits! Benefac (talk) 04:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Seattle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Ward Beecher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oliver Wendell Holmes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Algebra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Benefac. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Richard M. Locke, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Richard M. Locke to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

J947 ^{(c · m)} 01:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Richard M. Locke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://watson.brown.edu/people/faculty/locke. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Suicide? No. Far from it. Leader of N-VA. Has already made a political decision. They agree. To take the burden of crime on the conscience of the Flemish nation. Maybe not worth? Confront with their opinions. Still prove the participation of enemy foreign special services etc.109.129.45.190 (talk) 16:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

The article Encrypgen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Company seems notable but the page creator has done a poor job. Draftifying would be better for others to work on this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Csgir (talk) 02:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 11:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Encrypgen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Encrypgen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 21:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Benefac. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Encrypgen.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)