User talk:Bonadart

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Armed Forces of Mauritania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Srikanth (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OTT. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Programme.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello Bonadart! Your additions to National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

the content you removed included statements made by individuals. can i make changes to statement made by someone?? Bonadart (talk) 03:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

also these are the awards given out i can't make changes to the specification for the awards Bonadart (talk) 03:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Everything you add to Wikipedia needs to be written in your own words. If you can't figure out a way to do that, don't add it.

Short quotations are allowed. But it did not make sense for me to leave in the quotations when all the surrounding prose had to be removed. — Diannaa (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Srikanth (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

please kindly visit the below 2 links, ndtv link talks of name change and indianexpess link says clearly shows where maker says 'i cant compete with shahrukh khan'

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/srikanth-trailer-rajkummar-rao-visually-challenged-industrialist-biopic-watch-9260386/

https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/rajkummar-raos-sri-now-titled-as-srikanth-aa-raha-hai-sabki-aankhein-kholne-release-date-out-5339905 Bonadart (talk) 07:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

What part of the WP:LEAD being the summary of the most important points in the article do you not understand? Once again, I ask you, why is a random averted clash among the most notable aspects of this film? And that's me not even considering the numerous grammatical and WP:MOS issues in your edit. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

1. this is small budget movie after avoid clash with big film it was daeleyed to march but eventually released on may 10, even if you dont think its worthy enough why is that you are treating name change as crap, the link clearly shows name change, its a big issue for any film and also tageline is important and visible in the film poster itself, kindly give it a thought. Bonadart (talk) 07:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi there. I just came across your recent article, which was about a very interesting and inspiring woman. Unfortunately, you published it directly into the encyclopedia in a very poor state, with many issues. I corrected some of these issues, but would encourage you to learn more about the English Wikipedia's policies if you plan to continue contributing here.

In addition to lacking proper references for most of the statements in this article, many sentences were completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia, sounding more like a promotional biography. Additionally, you have been overlinking to pages which have no reason to connect, and leaving gaps in the flow of the article. You even had two section headings which had no content in them- this is fine for a draft but completely ridiculous in article space.

Please consider submitting your drafts for review through the Articles for Creation process moving forward, as they are likely to get deleted in the future rather than have someone try to clean them up for you as I did. For this particular article, since it's already been published, I encourage you to find more sources to reference where I've marked "citation needed" tags, to bring this article up to a basic level required by en.wiki. Definitely *do not* continue to add information without citing sources, or creating section headers with no content. Chiselinccc (talk) 02:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

the 2 sections sections were as per my planning but due to unwarranted reasons i couldnt complete sections Bonadart (talk) 03:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Rajalakshmi S.J. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article Mr. & Mrs. Mahi did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. It is always better to wait for websites like bollywoodhungama.com to update the boxoffice numbers. You can also add a reliable source from WP:ICTFSOURCES list with updated boxoffice number. RangersRus (talk) 18:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

what if bollywoodhungama doesnt show BO of Mr and Mrs Mahi anymore. The figure shown was from Times of India, surely a behemoth like that wont cook up figures or quote unreliable sources, kindly give it a thought. Bonadart (talk) 04:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

If Bollywood Hungama has no updated numbers within a week then you can use any reliable source that has the new numbers available. This source from Times Of India that you used shows boxoffice total collection stands at 34.77 (nett?, gross? India? Worldwide?). We need a total gross as specified by bollywood hungama. We can not use self made calculations to make the total gross using the numbers in times of India. If you have source that shows total gross that surpass bollywood hungama, please do welcome it. Viewers will look at the source for matching gross numbers shown in infobox.RangersRus (talk) 12:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Bonadart. Thank you for your work on De De Pyaar De 2. Another editor, Rydex64, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rydex64}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 16:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

hi Rydex/Rydex64 thanks for the appreciation, i have created many pages previously but this is first appreciation. Bonadart (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mor Chhainha Bhuinya instead.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers.

If the article either is ready for the encyclopedia or appears to be ready for the encyclopedia, the draft will be redirected to the article. However, the article could have been moved into article space instead.

If the article does not appear to be ready for the encyclopedia, the article may be nominated for deletion, and the draft will be kept.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mor Chhainha Bhuinya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Bonadart! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

hi robert the one in the draft (Mor Chhainha Bhuinya) was not my creation, i just tried to improve it to the best of capability, but somehow i wasnt satified bcoz the tone was simply not good and many other issues. Then i decided to completely change it, after i changed it, i thought it was better to create a wiki on my own, so i created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mor_Chhainha_Bhuinya, (you saw it) has turned out to be way better than the previous versions. You may think some sources are in hindi and some are in english so may be not reliable. If we create 2 separate one (hindi and english using respective language sources) then both will be incomplete. So it is better to create 1 single complete wiki. Also do note as presented in the wiki, nobody believed in the movie and none thought it would work, so there are very few independent sources available on the movie (1st movie in 30 yrs in this language, so virtually no coverage). Ofcourse now movies in this language (chhattisgarhi) get wide coverage even the sequel to this movie directed by same director has got way better coverage and i plan to create a page on that too later. I hope i have answered your querries. By the way if you can please help remove the one in draft (Draft:Mor Chhainha Bhuinya)). Thanks Bonadart (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to IRIS Bandar Abbas (421). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 07:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:NC-SHIPS on how to name ship class and ship articles. Thank you. Llammakey (talk) 18:10, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Llammakey (talk) for pointing it it out, i have done several ship class and ship articles previously, may be this time i missed out on some points mostly i guess in the info box section. will try to improve on them thanks. Bonadart (talk) 08:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Llammakey (talk) for correct the 2 ship class infobox but unfortunately seems you mixed up shahid suleimani class corvett and the shahid suleimani ship, both are same, if willing you can correct it, if not i will do it, once again thanks. Bonadart (talk) 08:23, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

hi Llammakey i corrected the mix up Bonadart (talk) 08:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Charliehdb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bad Newz (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 11:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

hi Charliehdb. first thing i aint a beginner, regarding the content involving 'colors cineplex' problem is only '/republic bharat' source is available. unfortunately its being shown as unreliable, i cant find any other notable source. i kept the content bcoz its a fact, if and when any notable reliable source is found it can be added later. thanks btw for pointing it out Bonadart (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

hi Charliehdb

i am asking a opinion from you, in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katrina_Kaif the section 'Early life and family' & 'Personal life' have been kept separate by an un related topic of 'career'. Logically both 'Early life and family' & 'Personal life' should be together followed by 'career', and so i merged both of them, but another editor 'krimuk' reverted it saying start a discussion in talk page, i did that. but i request you to give your honest opinion whether 'Early life and family' & 'Personal life' should be separate or together irrespective of discussion. I have not seen such thing in any page before. Somewhat similar thing has also been done in her husbands page. kindly give your opinion on these. Bonadart (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mor Chhainha Bhuinya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilaspur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello Bonadart, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Mor Chhainha Bhuinya, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mor Chhainha Bhuinya.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe:.

hi kindly note 'Mor Chhainha Bhuinya' is the most well structured page on the film unlike previous attempts. local media barely covers the local film industry despite fact that people are crazy about Chhattisgarhi language film. YouTube has lot of info but its not accepted here. This film has acquired cult status, and left Bollywood films like 'Mohabatein' 'Midsion Kashmir' upon its release. As such a film that gave birth to an entire industry on its own deserves a mention and place in wikipedia.

btw i have a question regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katrina_Kaif here 'Early life and family' and 'Personal life' have been separated by 'career' section, which i think doesnt make sense. As per me both 'Early life and family' and 'Personal life' should be together. I tried to make edit but another editor says we need to have discussion on her talk page. Even her husbands page has simnilar issue. I am asking for your opinion on this.

Thanks

Bonadart (talk) 07:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satish Jain (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Script.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

hi CNMall41 (talk) i checked i can confirm once again that 'News18 India by Network18 Group' has a 'green tick' meaning its legit and once again 'times of india' is marked 'no conconsensus', Bonadart (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

See my reply here. Also, let's keep the discussion about your conduct here and discussion about the referencing on the page. That way there is no confusion if it needs escalated. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Per this discussion which you were pinged to yet haven't replied. Also looking at the new accounts and the SPA who just started editing again for the purpose of this page it seems there is an interest being pushed from outside Wikipedia. The sourcing does not show notability and contains WP:FAKEREFs. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Title track.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 120 Bahadur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Scheduled for release in a year, just started filming, sources are NEWSORGINDIA or otherwise unreliable (most based on announcement from filmmaker - churnalism).. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Mor Chhainha Bhuinya, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Despite previous warnings, you are still adding unreliable sources. CNMall41 (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

hi CNMall41 (talk) i have no intention to spark a quarelling contest or arguments, i am an experienced person having created over 150 wiki pages till date since joining it in 2008. I have no intention to to go on a edit war and would like to see you do the same. I have nothing else to say to or do. Bonadart (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

I would not have replied but you pinged me. I do not edit war, I simply revert what is not policy-based. Your page creation history has nothing to do with your current conduct. Do as you will and if you prefer I will not leave notices like the one above. However, I will need to go to ANI if it continues. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Metro... In Dino (2024). Based on previous warnings, and even the polite request to stop, you continue to add unreliable sources. Unfortunately, I will need to take the conduct to ANI should it continue. I am not sure what else to do at this point. CNMall41 (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

that poster was a genuine mistake i wasn't aware of and its evident that even you didn't know that otherwise you would have corrected me on that Bonadart (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

??? What poster? Follow the link. You continue to add unreliable sources as I pointed out in the warning below. It is getting tiring trying to lead you without going to WP:ANI. At this point, I have no choice should you choose to continue. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

that imdb link was changed after better source was found Bonadart (talk) 04:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Again, again, again.......follow the link in the warning above. You added this and since that time have added more. I'm done. It is clearly a WP:CIR issue. Do as you will but I have a feeling this will be at ANI soon as it is a huge waste of editor's time. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 120 Bahadur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/120 Bahadur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 02:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

I am unsure of what to do at this point. Despite previous discussion about introducing unreliable sources on this and other pages, and tagging the page instead of blanketly removing the sources, you continue to use them. Can you please stop using references that are unreliable under WP:NEWSORGINDIA? CNMall41 (talk) 18:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 120 Bahadur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/120 Bahadur. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Owen× ☎ 20:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

thanks it is not deleted, will include more as info is available and then bring to mainspace

Bonadart (talk) 07:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

I would advise using AfC as opposed to just bringing it to the mainspace. Doing so gives the appearance that the AfD process is being circumvented. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

I agree. Owen× ☎ 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Navika Sagar Parikrama II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voyage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Want to Talk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Bonadart. I noticed that your recent edit to Mor Chhainha Bhuinya added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

hi the problem is both poster of both Mor Chhainha Bhuinya and its sequal Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2 were clicked by me in front of cimema theatre using my mobile phone. Unforfutnately i dont have those picks with me anymore since the 2 films are not in theatres anymore. as an evidence if you look at the Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2 poster you will see in left bottom corner '8th week' in hindi '8वां सप्ताह' which is only possible if clicked in cinema hall. so if possible please help reinstate those 2 posters as now these cant be uploaded by me as i dont have any copy and i dont think anyone can do it, as these posters are not available online. Bonadart (talk) 08:09, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

hi 1 need help , i had created De De Pyaar De 2 wiki page but then release date was May 1 2025, but now rescheduled to mid november 2025. suddenly editor CNMall41 comes up and deletes page without discussion saying film 1 year away. whereas Avatar 3 and Jolly LLB 3 are to release in december and july of 2025 respectively but already have well established pages. please help me protect this page. Bonadart (talk) 08:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article De De Pyaar De 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De De Pyaar De 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

This is not the first time you have been uncivil in a deletion discussion. I realize it can be stressful to have a page you created nominated for deletion, but please be calm with your comments in the discussion. CNMall41 (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

you are going off track, i am calm n civil enough, i havent abused or chidded anyone, i am giving just a reasoning based on logic, if one cant reply to it, doesnt mean i m uncivil. ciao Bonadart (talk) 07:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I think this is a case of WP:NOTGETTINGIT. I will just be blunt and request taht you read WP:IUC. If it continues, it will need to be reported. Again, this is not the first time you done this in a deletion discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

you say things about me, but you dont look into yourself, do i need to remind you what you did with De De Pyaar De 2 page. you just came in and removed the page wholesale, giving reason 'film is delayed', its available in history doesnt that classify as '/disruptive editing'. 1st look within. ciao Bonadart (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toaster (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toaster (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 09:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active Indian Navy ships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Floating dock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

You were very wrong to revert my edit of List of active Indian Navy ships. My edit summary was "properly close table (|}); dashes; improve <ref>s; headings in sentence capitalization; avoid all caps; straight single quotes". Your edit summary was "most changes are totally unnecessary", but you could not be more wrong. I came to this page because it was listed in Lint errors: Table tag that should be deleted. This is a high-priority lint error and we are working hard to keep Wikipedia free of this error. It was also listed in Lint errors: Fostered content. We are also working hard to keep Wikipedia free of this error. Looking again at my edit summary:

• properly close table (|}): This fixed both the "Table tag that should be deleted" errors and the "Fostered content" error.
• dashes: This was done to bring the page into compliance with MOS:DASH.
• improve <ref>s: See: MOS:REF.
• headings in sentence capitalization: See: MOS:HEADCAPS.
• avoid all caps: See: MOS:EMPHCAPS.
• straight single quotes: See: MOS:CURLY.

I fixed the lint errors, brought the page into compliance with Wikipedia standards, and wrote a detailed edit summary. You put these errors back in. Next time you don't understand why an editor made changes, read the edit summary and do some research before you revert. Also, include an edit summary every time you edit saying what you did. —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

thanks but you should have mentioned them earlier btw there are no all caps anywhere if talking of sources title afaik the sources title/links cant be disturbed Bonadart (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Some titles must be disturbed. A title that includes a curly apostrophe (’) must have the the apostrophe changed to a straight apostrophe ('), per MOS:CURLY. A title that includes double quotation marks (") must have the marks switched to single (') per MOS:QINQ. Various other changes to titles are routine, including condensing multiple spaces to single spaces, avoiding all caps, and removing space before colon. Occasionally "(sic)" is inserted in a title to emphasize that the error was in the original. There is no expectation that a title in a Wikipedia reference is typographically identical to the original. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Navika Sagar Parikrama II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PIB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Toaster (2025) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toaster_(film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BOVINEBOY2008 12:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhool Chuk Maaf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Backlash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

that is a showcase of the power of the Indian Navy by pictures.It is a good thing.and I am adding it and getting +1053 Badrinarayan konar (talk) 02:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

whether you like dont matter what is the niorm follow that, remove it better Bonadart (talk) 04:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

I noticed you reverted my change to the page List of active Indian Navy ships, adding back the details for the Arihant-class ballistic missile submarine INS Aridhaman.

Note that as per WP:NOR and WP:VER, even if you are sure something is true it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it on Wikipedia. Notwithstanding any Indian Navy policy, unless you are able to provide a currently accessible and WP:RELIABLE source to validate that the ship is in service at present, it does not meet the policy requirements. If you are able to find a credible, WP:PRIMARY or WP:SECONDARY source to validate this fact, you can add it back with the appropriate citation inline. Batram (talk) 07:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Dear Bonadart,See The Indian Air Force It has it. Badrinarayan konar (talk) 12:14, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

its not abt IAF its of IN or navy no navy wiki has this, so request to follow it and don't indulge in edit pls. Bonadart (talk) 17:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Toaster Film (2025) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:2008:D0F5:6012:D6DB (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because lasrt version that was in march but now it almost august and 2026 is 4 months away. This new version is an updated version and includes many information not present earlier. if you still insist then i ask you by same logic what are Baaghi 4, Jolly LLB 3, Now You See Me 3, Avatar 3 all slated for late 2025, and Shrek 4 slated for late 2026 doing here? if these pages can stay so can Toaster. can you nominate for deletion, redirect the other pages i mentioned or draft them! can you do that? just asking

--Bonadart Bonadart (talk) 14:01, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

I see you recreated the page for the film Toaster, despite it being decided months ago that it should be a redirect. You also created it under Toaster Film (2025) instead of the original Toaster (film) in order to avoid detection that it was recreated. Based on the notices above, you had also attempted to recreate it in April. Can you advise why? Wanted to hopefully get an explanation prior to taking the conduct to WP:ANI. CNMall41 (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

NO i didnt and please dont take anything personally, please dont. i changed the name bcoz there are many films that released in past that have toaster in name, one of them is The Brave Little Toaster, also The Toaster (film), and no i didnt change the film name i only added the year 2025 to differentiate it. I hope now you can calm down. Also last version was in last version that was in march but now it almost august and 2026 is 4 months away.

if you still insist then i ask you by same logic what are Baaghi 4, Jolly LLB 3, Now You See Me 3, Avatar 3 all slated for late 2025, and Shrek 4 slated for late 2026 doing here? if these pages can stay so can Toaster. can you nominate for deletion, redirect the other pages i mentioned or draft them! can you do that? just asking

Bonadart (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Your projection that I am not calm is really a reflection of your deflecting. Those films already existed and you created the page twice already under a different title. Why the change now? Please stick on topic. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

i aint it seems you are deflecting last time i didnt add year, this time i added year to differentiate, why taking it personally, i clearly remember what you typed when the dicussion on Mor Chhainha Bhuinya, Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2, was to to keep it was as if you were disappointed, its on record. it seems you are taking it personally i repeat please dont Bonadart (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Actually, you answered your own question when I look closer. Baaghi 4 is a redirect to Baaghi (film series) and rightfully so. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:54, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

baaghi 4 has now been directed may last i chkd it wasnt but what about Jolly LLB 3, Now You See Me 3, Avatar 3 and Shrek 4. wht do you have to say on them? Bonadart (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

I am not taking things personally so instead let me post at ANI and bow out from trying to discuss with you. Again, see WP:OTHERSTUFF for the films you list. I am also unsure what you mean by "clearly remember what you typed when the discussion on...." Are you referring to this deletion discussion? I am unsure how that applies to your circumventing of the AfD discussion on Toaster, especially since it was a year ago when that discussion took place. The relevant deletion discussion is this one which I started in February of this year which resulted in a redirect. You then recreated the page two months later and it was speedy deleted. You now recreated it under a different name and it is again up for speedy deletion. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

• I have deleted the article as a near verbatim copy of Toaster (film). Bonadart, when the film is released and the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toaster (film) are addressed, then the article should be at the original title (i.e. Toaster (film)). Please don't create articles at multiple titles.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

  i sorry to see this, i work in cinema related industry so i know this film is set to release anytime in next 2 months. Bonadart (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

First, your knowledge is not a reliable source, and second, if you are editing articles based on a subject matter where you have a potential conflict of interest, that's a problem.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

i work in printing press don't know how it can be conflict.Bonadart (talk) 18:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

The numbers listed for each category of ships is a nice and useful addition. Either the numbers need to be put out on each type in the tables or the list on the top right corner fits nicely and is useful for those who want to get quick numbers rather than go through the page and count. So I am adding it back and will add a discussion topic in the page for you to share your opinion why it should not be added. Sabkdada (talk) 02:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

then why list them below once again, its useless, its not about nice and useful addition. plrase dont add just to boost your edit count. please look in convention, no other wiki list of navy ships in any nation has this double listing. so i am remoing it, and please dont add it back again Bonadart (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Then you add the number for each segment. You expect people to count the number of frigates etc. Either one should exist. Sabkdada (talk) 07:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

if needed add the no. in list below beside heading no need to add at top Bonadart (talk) 07:57, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

You can add that before removing the list from top. When you do contribute do it with a positive outlook and not loss of information. Sabkdada (talk) 08:11, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

it is you who is indulging in edit war pls dont. as said pls add no. if need in list below beside heading, no point in adding lisy at top once again, show any other wiki that lists twice Bonadart (talk) 08:35, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Glad that finally understood what numbers should be there and what you are supposed to do. Contribute. Good work in ensuring that the numbers are added now. You can have your opinion about having it on top not having it on top etc, that never mean, you remove something without improving on the article. Sabkdada (talk) 15:05, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

ha ha one with 200+ edits telling me what to do okay noted Bonadart (talk) 15:45, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Actually, WP:3RR is applicable here. Also, see WP:DBN, as it is uncivil to disregard a user attempting to have a discussion simply because they have 200 edits. Remember, we all at one time had 200 edits. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:15, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

who is disregarding whom, dont look too much into it, point noted and same has been done with, issue closed. Bonadart (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

You disregarded a new user and were uncivil with your commet, "ha ha one with 200+ edits telling me what to do okay noted." If you disagree with content, discuss content, but disregarding someone simply because they are new is not civil. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:35, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

me and avaiator jr have tried hard to streamline the page but if you are so concerned see that this user sabkdadahas been adamently trying to add list at top despite being told repeatedly not to, and after that says 'glad you understood' then if i may say why this user doesnt want to understand. anyways issue closed Bonadart (talk) 16:51, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

I see the conversation. Your talk page happened to be on my watchlist based on the previous thread you and I had back and forth with. If you have an issue with the user's conduct, you can discuss in a polite way as I am with you. Would you find it civil if I came here and said, "haha, and now someone with 4,000 edits is trying to tell "me" what to do? Yeah, okay."? I wouldn't find that appropriate. Take the person to ANI, ban them from your talk page, use 3O or RfC, report them for incivility, etc.; but, don't become uncivil yourself is what I am saying.--CNMall41 (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

ok noted Bonadart (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Names will change, can get banned for more number of times than the age of newbies in Wikipedia. So its not wise to assume things and give advice to people with just 4 years, 6 months and 27 days of contribution. :) Sabkdada (talk) 06:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of historical ships of the Brazilian Navy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

hi the chance getting info on historical ships is rare only pics are available other than that if any proof available feel free to add them and improve the page, btw afaik the list of these has been imn wiki for several yrs now, feel free to add sources if you can. and also if any issue there is a talk page for it, kindly start a discussion there, a kind request. Bonadart (talk) 14:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 120 Bahadur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/120 Bahadur (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Owen× ☎ 14:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

the page should not be deleted as unlike previous time when reason for draftify was given as 'too early', this time the page has been created wghen the film is just 3 months away. Also unlike last time the page has been updated coinsiderably with large number of sources to bolster validity. Bonadart (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Bonadart! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 120 Bahadur several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:120 Bahadur, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. As you did here. Per WP:BRD, use the talk page and get consensus. This is COAT to promote the company and not necessary for readers. They can link to that page and read anything they want about the company.. CNMall41 (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

hi i dont know why you call that a edit war, you removed things that you considered unneccessary, as for me i having agreed with it only remodelled your addition without affecting the essence, its no way a edit war. edit war would have been if i had reinstated exact previous version several times repeatedly, which is not the case. you made many modifications in my pages i welcome them, but then i have my right to disagree or add my modification, dont i. its not only about company but also its activities in film industry in general naming films would have made it specific. btw i too can call it edit war from your side as you reinstated exact same previous version, whereas i had modified it. anyways need a suggestion from you in the 120 bahadur page, i think a comparison section should be added about this film and 1962: The War in the Hills, your opinion. Bonadart (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. I removed this and you added this. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:04, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Your edit to Brazilian Navy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:10, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

ok thanks for pointing out, i usually donrt make such mistakes, but sometimes everyone slips. i will try to remodel the content so that it doesnt affect copyright issue, but please note material is indeed of critical importance Bonadart (talk) 16:52, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Toaster Film (2025), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I removed this and based on your lack of response, i am unsure what else to do at this point. You continue to introduce content that is not in the sources. If you continue, it will need to be escalated to a noticeboard. CNMall41 (talk) 02:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of historical ships of the Brazilian Navy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of historical ships of the Brazilian Navy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:04, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

I created a separate page to 'List of historical ships of the Brazilian Navy' bcoz it helps to make the page more visible and readable, in current situation it is a section and gets suppressed under other major sections, where it has little to no sources provided to support. please note this section has been present since a long time but no sources were present, (it was just a section). creation of a separate page will allow for addition of more sources previously not present/added and provide better validity to a significant part of brazil navy chronology. btw it would have been better if you had initiaated a disciussion in talk page before nominating. Bonadart (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

In addition to once again moving something to the mainspace unilaterally that was previously decided (twice) that you need consensus for, you have used many fake references, unreliable soruces, and are now introducing WP:OR. I would suggest stepping back and evaluating what you are doing. At this point, it is exhausting trying to clean these up and wasting a lot of people's times. the next alternative would be to request a ban on you creating topics in the mainspace. CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Actually, this is pretty bad and I already removed half a dozen previously. Are you using WP:LLM to assist? I can already see you created this days ago based on your reference retrieval dates so it was likely created offline. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Hoping you will still respond. Errors such as this continue to happen. You state it was announced in February 2025 yet previously you stated it was announced in 2024 which you also cite on the page. Cannot be both. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

netflix announced in February 2025 producers announced in 2024 Bonadart (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Perfect. Discuss on talk page per WP:ONUS where content should be discussed. Can you answer my question about conduct? It appears you used a WP:LLM to create the page. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:38, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

its you who is refusing to discuss in talk page, instead you revert updates without discussion, i had told you several times to discuss but you didnt. Bonadart (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

I understand. This is the same back and forth we have had previously. WP:ONUS requires the person wishing to include the information to get consensus. That person would be you in this case. It is not up to me to get consensus. Also note that the article is a contentious topic so reverting more than once will be reported for edit warring. I beg of you to use the talk page and follow WP:ONUS as it is not that difficult. Now, content aside, can you please answer the question about LLM? --CNMall41 (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

who reverted first me!! no its you Bonadart (talk) 07:47, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

I reverted you. Yes that is correct. That is how WP:ONUS works. At this point, it may be a WP:CIR issue. I have tried to help you many times but it seems to be a case of WP:IDHT. Unfortunately, I am unsure of what else to do other than report the conduct, especially since you still refuse to answer the question about LLM which you have previously been warned about. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 120 Bahadur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of the following discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/120 Bahadur (2nd nomination). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Goldsztajn (talk) 10:52, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

thats 2 votes each for the 3, anyways can you answer the following

you say draftify this page when its just 90 days away from release. but then kindly tell me how come the following pages are flying high on this space,

1. Baaghi 4 was created june 2023 (afaik) (was redirect for just 1 month now live again) - releasing 5 sept 2025

2. Jolly LLB 3 created june 2024 (releasing 19 sept 2025)

3. Shrek 5 created 2016 & 2019(releasing 30 june 2027 but in the main space eversince)

4. Avatar 4 created 2017 (releasing 21 dec 2029 but in the main space since 2017/2018)

5. Avatar 3 created 2017 (releasing 19 dec 2025 but in the main space since 2017/2018)

6. Now You See Me 3 created 2015 (releasing 14 nov 2025 but in the main space since 2022)

now should 'too early' and 'fewer sources' should have applied on these films, i agree 4 of them are whales but when you apply a yardstick it must be applied on others as well, problem is that no one is giving answer to question asked based on reason provided by me, just holding on to a single point (churnalism) to justify your point when i give you 6 reasons, to me doesnt sound correct. check the above 6 you may find many source meeting same point. as for this page it is notable, reliable, most important while others are fiction this is based actual events involving real life characters. so in all sense n purpose this page deserves to exist in this space. you may say i am repeating myself, but if asking correct question based on reason is that i cant help it. as for churning, to me it is after all published in very same sources that are considered secondary online 3rd party sources used in various pages. you say press release, can you tell me which info on which is not press release, (way i see, all info are published on inputs/statement given those associated with that film via [PR/PC, no one cooks up a story/write up in kitchen) can you say why same yardstick isnt applied on all 6 above. i can mention dozens more such film pages that have existed for several years (still to release) but the above are the same one i have used earlier so using again Bonadart (talk) 11:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Please stop misleading. Baaghi 4 was redirected numerous times and it was NOT a full page until August 11, 2025, three weeks shy of it being released. Not going through the rest due to WP:OTHERSTUFF. Based on this draftification of this and others, coupled with your moves back to mainspace despite AfD discussions, I would ask that you no loner create pages in the mainspace and instead use the WP:AfC process. You are obviously not required but asking that you do so as it has been a lot of time wasted on these creations. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:33, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maa (2025 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Park Street.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello Bondart. Please read WP:HATNOTE for details of how to correctly format a hatnote, and specifically WP:NAMB for when they are not required, like at Maa (2025 film), which is not an ambiguous title. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

the issue similarity in name, genre both of which are simiasr as well as the storyline. which is why i reckon this differenciation is a must. take for e.g. the recent film nToaster, there are ma y films that have toaster but different storyline and different name, so npot needed. but here there are similarities in name, genre and basic story. Bonadart (talk) 18:27, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metro... In Dino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Tere Ishk Mein. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because You moved this to mainspace 3 days after the AfD??. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tere Ishk Mein, you may be blocked from editing. Can you explain why you moved this to mainspace, three days after the deletion discussion was closed? You are effectively attempting to override the results of an AfD. CNMall41 (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

i havent indulged in disruptive editing i collected latest info on the film and thought it was justfible to update the draft pageas you may have seen i added lot of new info that completely changed the page look, as such i consider it deserves to be in main space with a latest fresh look. i never disturn others work, but others have done that on work in wiki. also the film is less than 3 fortnights away from release, if you say issue is with notability, what will happen if therent much sources that are notable till the film releases. are you suggesting it will be still kept in draft even after film rellease just bcoz notable resources (so called) arent available, kindly think about it.

Bonadart (talk) 17:17, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

It most certainly is disruptive to move a draft back to mainspace right after a consensus at AfD. Either you know this and don't care, or you don't know this in which case it is a WP:CIR issues. Regardless, it will be reported if happens again. Not that what you "have seen" and what you "consider" has no relevance to overturn consensus. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:42, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

are you suggesting it will be still kept in draft even after film rellease - I am saying it will be in draft until there are reveiws that show notability which likely won't happen until after the release. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello Bonadart! Your additions to Draft:Tere Ishk Mein have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. When you are adding information from a source, you cannot just copy and paste the sentence or phrase from the source. That's a copyright issue and is taken VERY seriously on Wikipedia. You've done it at least once on this draft, please review everything else you have added to look for any further copyright issues. Please don't expect other editors to clean up after you, that's not helpful. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kriti Sanon filmography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kriti Sanon filmography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ikkis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcomer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 120 Bahadur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Background Music.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page De De Pyaar De 2, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not WP:BLUDGEON. Once there are reviews, it will be notable and you can freely move it to mainspace. Moving without those would be an attempt to circumvent the AfD discussion and frankly would need to be brought up at ANI at this point.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tere Ishk Mein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

since when adding valid info became blugeoning, you talk of civility but do you practice it? anyways i only have to say let others review that, you alone reviewing and repeatedly denying it isnt helping, this isnt a novel, that it be printed so must be perfect, its a editable page that will be edited even after 10 years from now, just like rannjhana is being edited, or sholay. i hope i put my point Bonadart (talk) 08:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Others already have reviewed it yet you did not like the decision so you are attemptign to circumvent that decision. You have done the same for others including this which is not yet released. Feel free to report my lack of civility if you feel that is the case. I will be reporting you should you attempt to circumvent another AfD discussion (which is why the term bludgeoning was used). Trying to give you a fair warning but it seems like a case of WP:IDHT.--CNMall41 (talk) 01:21, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

you still didn't answer whether this is a novel that be printed or a page that be edited even after 10 years. it be better first decided that.Bonadart (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Based on previous warnings and others who have supported those warnings, I do not believe it will go well for your editing priveleges once this is reported so I implore of you to stop circumventing and attempting to circumvent AfD discussions. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:23, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

you also didn't answer why other can't review a page. you have targeted my pages for long now, I don't mind as I know when I am right. Bonadart (talk) 02:43, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

First, I am not obligated to answer your questions. The pages you are targeting are the same ones on my watchlist that were created by or have long histories of being edited by SOCKS. Other's are free to review the page but there is no other conclusion they would be able to make as it was.......and I will repeat yet again........it was already decided during a deletion discussion that it is not notable. Once the film is released and there are reviews, it will be notable. Do you understand that moving pages back to the mainspace that were decided at AfD discussions they should be draftified is in fact circumventing the AfD process --CNMall41 (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

In fact, I have intentionally NOT targeted a lot of your edits. An example would be this which someone already objected to and reverted. I object to it as well since it is WP:PROMO but I did not revert. I am hoping that you will get it and not have to take it to ANI, but it is not looking that way. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:52, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gustaakh Ishq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhaskar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. You have repeatedly inserted flawed spelling, punctuation, and linking. Please do not restore the substandard English again. If English is difficult for you, be aware that there are other Wikipedia projects in other languages, perhaps even in a language in which you are proficient. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 02:30, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

ok changing death anniversary to anniversary of death is great english, and seems you think this a book about to be printed hence needs to be picture perfect, there wont be any editing after 5 years, well what can i say. Bonadart (talk) 06:55, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rajalakshmi S. J., may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:02, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

thanks corrected Bonadart (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

HI! The Hindustan Times link you added, shares stats from Sacnik which is considered unreliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES, and reliable source citing unreliable source is also considered unreliable, see WP:FRUIT Sid95Q (talk) 05:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

but fact is fact that none can deny, which is advance booking of around 2 cr but opening over 7 cr. btw time has come to consider sacnilk a relaible source as many website quote it even people who review refer to it. chk it Bonadart (talk) 11:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

On Wikipedia we work on reliable sources, not on assumptions. The only way to prove a fact is providing a reliable source. If you think Sacnik is a reliable source you can start a discussion regarding this on ICTF talk page. Sid95Q (talk) 12:22, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

are you saying 2 cr advance booking not a proof from reliable, and the 7 cr opening day not proof from reliable sources Bonadart (talk) 16:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Please see MOS:FILMMARKETING/MOS:TRAILER, which states, "Do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods such as trailers, TV spots, radio ads, and posters." Sid95Q (talk) 05:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of future ships of the Brazilian Navy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of future ships of the Brazilian Navy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ckfasdf (talk) 10:35, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

hi this is an indispensible part of wikipedia lst of ships, if this list is deleted then it must apply on all the wikipedia pages on lists of future ships of all nations, do note that that. reason not so much info is available doesnt or wouldnt stand anymorre even oif regular updates are present.

Bonadart (talk) 11:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:End Poverty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

hi as i had said at start, there is another global ngo with same name, so to differentiate between the 2 its important to create separate wikipedia page, and this is a stub and if later enough material is available it can be added, i wpould suggest you take a look at the wiki page of global ngo of same name. Bonadart (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Non-governmental organisations in India

added links pointing to Katha, Maher, Goonj and Lepra

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

HI! Please read MOS:TRAILER, "Do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods such as trailers, TV spots, radio ads, and posters. Instead, use reliable sources to provide useful commentary about a method, such as a trailer's intended effect or the audience's reported reaction to it." Thank you. Sid95Q (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2026 (UTC)