User talk:Brickc1

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey there. I see you're listed as a translator at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Translators fluent in Spanish. I was wondering if you could help clean up a sentence in an article I found that is kind of awkward. The Spanish is "También estaba ocupado en labrar la piedra famosa y grande, muy labrada donde estaban esculpidas las figuras de los meses y años, días 21 y semanas" and it's Google translated to "was also busy in carving the famous and large stone, very carved where the figures of the months and years, days 21 and weeks were sculpted". The gist seems to be correct, but "very carved" doesn't make sense to me, and the end bit is awkward ("days 21"). The article it is found in is Aztec sun stone. If you could help out it would be appreciated. Lexicon (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Apologies, I had a many-year hiatus from this account. Brickc1 (talk) 13:14, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cameron Brick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 22:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your helpful review. If possible, it would be useful to understand what criteria were insufficient. It's difficult to know how best to proceed (delete submission, improve rationale, wait for further recognition) without that info. Brickc1 (talk) 15:54, 2 September 2025 (UTC)