User talk:Buf92

Hello, Buf92, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TonySt. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lowlife (band), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tony 02:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lowlife (band), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. tony 02:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lowlife (band), you may be blocked from editing. Warning retracted. monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 02:16, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Lowlife were never part of the original shoegaze scene. That's a known fact. Buf92 (talk) 02:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

You have very good edits at post-punk at the moment the Neue Musik heads up was great as well as the Huxley reference to feelies. Thank you Aradicus77 (talk) 17:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Buf92 (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 00:17, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Reporting Block Evasion / Sockpuppetry

User Aradicus77 was blocked on 13 December, 2025, for 1 month after my report concerning disruptive editing. While their block is still active, a new account named Ezéchiel Péquay was created today, 25 December and has resumed the same activity.

This edit was made today in the article Shoegaze, which is the same article that led to Aradicus77 being blocked in the first place. The use of broken English in their edit summaries, as well as new edits in music articles related to underground / alternative bands or genres , very much indicate this is the same person.

Please review this. Thank you. Pinging voorts (the admin who issued the block of the original Aradicus77 account). Buf92 (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

While you are blocked, you only have access to this page to ask to be unblocked. Please follow the instructions in the block notice to make an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 13:27, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

So nothing will be done about the user who apparently created a new account to bypass his block? Buf92 (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

As 331dot said, while you are blocked, you may only request an unblock. If you don't intend to request an unblock, there's nothing more to discuss. If you continue to push the issue, I'll revoke TPA. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:45, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

The user was once involved in ban evasion at ANI and is very likely repeating it this time. I'll leave the matter in your hands. Buf92 (talk) 16:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Upd: It's just some comedy show going on. Ezéchiel Péquay just today removed "psychedelic rock" from the Infobox in the article on the Velvet Underground & Nico album. Interestingly, Aradicus77 had exactly the same concern about the genre just recently in the same article . This user is a total con artist evading blocks. Buf92 (talk) 05:23, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm not Aradicus77, but I agree with him. OK the genre is "sourced", but we also have to think about the context of why/where & when the music was recorded. If an author write that this album is "prog" it doesn't make this album a prog rock album. Ezéchiel Péquay (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Lmao Idk what's crazier, that you were up on Christmas day talking about me on Wikipedia or that you accused me of sockpuppeting with an account that if you search on Google can see is a completely different person. Give it a rest brochacho Aradicus77 (talk) 13:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

It's no crazier than keeping a prolific original researcher afloat. Buf92 (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

U the guy who was putting CLOP on shoegaze page and got owned by Bink Aradicus77 (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)