User talk:ByteBeacon

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Class 4 Fault Managed Power and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

are you able to give examples, sentences, etc., from my draft - that i can understand the issues? I can't fix what I don't know. This is the 3rd rejection. this last submission is the same content as previous drafts, but shortened, revised, attempting to be encyclopedia-like.

There is summarized information, from reliable sources, and cited, such as the National Electrical Code, and Underwriters Laboratory. And I don't know if this is among the specific issues.

And you are the second reviewer of this same draft. I'm not sure reviewers are consistent and I'm back to wondering what i have to correct.

I am left to submit for further disapproval. I'm considering if this is worth my time.

On a good note - I had assumed anybody can write an article and post it, and therefore minimized Wikipedia. ByteBeacon (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LuniZunie were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fault-Managed Power and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 00:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

this was the 4th rejections. from 3 different reviewers. for much of the same reasons, with no specific sentences or paragraphs to understand the errors, even though attempts were made to address the errors. very frustrating. 2603:8090:1700:54:B4B7:9C7E:4323:B56B (talk) 19:53, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, ByteBeacon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Class 4 Fault Managed Power, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 5 March 2026 (UTC)