User talk:CodeLyoko/Archive 3

You have it wrong. The Lanham act pertained to Trademarks and such things and was in 1946. The DHC was created in October, 1940 by FDR.

Here's the information: 234.5.4 Records of the Defense Homes Corporation (DHC) History: Established, October 23, 1940, to alleviate a housing shortage for defense workers. Transferred to the Federal Public Housing Authority of the National Housing Agency, February 24, 1942. DHL liquidation began, 1945. Assets transferred to the RFC for final liquidation, 1948. ^[1] 68.185.167.184 (talk) 02:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

• Danchakit (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Neeraj Mehta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have made the changes as per the suggestions. Please have a look and suggest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Neeraj_Mehta

Danchakit (talk) 11:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Why was I banned? Wackslas - Holler at me (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

My statement was (paraphrasing myself) that "Theoretically, Many parents may assume their child is unique and special, or seek special status for their child, thereby assigning the title "Indigo" to their child because they love their child. Thus, it is logical (and follows) that this process of applying a unique identifying title to a child makes it more difficult to study the phenomenon of Indigo children. Since the phenomenon is self-reported, and many parents (and self-identifiers) see it as a badge of uniqueness, it stands to reason the difficulty in studying the phenomenon may be due to skewed self-reporting. Thus, the assumption that "Indigo" has no validity is biased because it has not considered the difficulties associated with studying the phenomenon."

THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE A CITATION.

NEVER DELETE MY EDITS AGAIN!

E V E R! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.240.118 (talk) 19:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your edit to that article, although it might be logical, does not mean that it was not opinionated and it still requires a source and, even if it had a source, would still be removed due to it being opinionated. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 04:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in ACC, during the normal checks for access requirements, I noticed you have not provided identification. This requirement is mandatory. If you still wish to help please submit you identification, and once logged at Identification noticeboard just poke an ACC Admin to continue with registration, no need to re-apply your current request will be re-activated. Hope to hear from you soon and again thank you for your interest. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I know. I submited my proof last night and am now just waiting on someone from the WMF to add me. Thanks for the message! TheMesquito^buzz 18:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Great, no problem. give us a poke once you're posted on the board. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 18:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done @Mlpearc: Done here by Jalexander-WMF. Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 23:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Also pinging, @Stwalkerster: and @FastLizard4: TheMesquito^buzz 01:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

TheMesquito, thank you for interest in the account creation process. I have verified your Identification and I have approved your request, welcome to the team. You may now access the interface here. Before you do so, please read the account creation guide and our username policy thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You should also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC. Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! Mlpearc (open channel) 02:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I, TheMesquito, do agree to the ACC guide, as listed here Wikipedia:Request an account/Guide . Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 02:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

The User PavelStaykov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is not willing anyhow to understand what other editors are telling him, nor is willing to constructivelly edit or join the discussion. He continues with such behavior even after my final warning and I'm not willing to act as a bad guy and report him to the incidents noticeboard. Could you join the discussion at his talk page, or see by yourself what can be done? I contacted you as previously in March you already warned him at the talk page. (Besides, was the my (or by editors in general) use of warnings acceptable and recommended?)--Crovata (talk) 00:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for getting things right. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Lixxx235 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I pinky swear I'll stop nominating the flood of people that I have been recently... after I nominate TheMesquito :P. TheMesquito (talk · contribs · count · logs) is an incredibly hardworking member of this community. With just under 4000 edits, he may not have the highest edit count, but he puts so much effort into each edit and spends time to make sure he gets it right. TheMesquito is a Huggler, and he's not always the fastest, his reverts are all high-quality and assume good faith while not missing vandalism. He reviews AFCs, participates in discussions, and promptly and civilly responds on his talk page, and is a wonderful person to converse with. TheMesquito truly is one of Wikipedia's unsung great editors.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

TheMesquito

Vandalism Fighter

Editor of the Week for the week beginning May 5, 2015

an incredibly hardworking community member. Lots of effort to "get it right". High-quality reverts, AGF, and vandalism patrol and still a pleasure to work with.

Recognized for

Reviews AFCs and civilly participating in heated discussions.

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins! 20:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your service to Wikipedia, and congratulations on the award! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for taking the extra time to "get it right". . Buster Seven Talk 22:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
• Congrats! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 02:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hold tight, I need to contact the tool admins before granting you the right. Sorry for the confusion. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

As I see above, Mlpearc has clearly endorsed this request. Re-granted. The template, to be procedural:

After reviewing your request for the account creator right, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: Just for the record, everything above is in regards to giving access to the ACC tool, not the ACC bit. I have not looked through TheMesquito actions on the tool, TheMesquito has been around long enough (a few weeks) to need the flag. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@Mlpearc: It was endorsed on WP:PERM/ACC by Doctree (talk · contribs). Thanks, TheMesquito^buzz 19:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Good enough for me, I wasn't objecting, just clarifying. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Did not think you where, just wanted to clear it up also! TheMesquito^buzz 19:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Indeed. To be clear, moving forward I'll explicitly get verification before granting the right. Sorry again TheMesquito for the confusion and cluttering your user rights log :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Would you mind adding a talk page comment explaining your addition of an {{undue}} tag at Axact? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Why don't you just add the "banned" template to a user talk, instead of replacing the content, and then even redirecting it? - Please revert at least the redirect. If redirect, then from user to talk, not the other way round. This has been discussed at length before. A talk page such as User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz informs our readers better than a template only. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done I was also told elsewhere that would probably be better, so i just added the two templates to the talkpage with all the content restored. TheMesquito^buzz 07:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I like that! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

(For clarity, this is for Special:Diff/670777871 @ Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyberpower678.) Sorry, you basically invited those of us on IRC to do this... Just make sure to wash out the trout smell before heading back over to the village . Cheers! L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

I have to ask... how exactly did a plug-in change "Buttchased" to "Buttchased"? Although, your !vote was the highlight of my night (a sad reflection on my lack of a life as I'm studying for the bar exam). Inks.LWC (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Google search Butt to Butt plugin, it basicly replaces the word butt with the word butt, but it messed up an affected a text box. TheMesquito^buzz 05:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

This might be my favorite diff ever. Thanks for the laugh, Mesquito! MJ94 (talk) 03:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

You're getting this because you're listed as a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth and have some fairly recent edits in your contribution history.

If you're still in the DFW area you might want to keep your eye on this and consider participating:

Amon Carter Museum edit-a-thon

I've volunteered to serve as their editing assistant / technical advisor to help the folks who show up (many of which are apparently going to be Wikpedia newcomers) with how to edit. More experienced hands would certainly be useful if this project gels. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC) (Not watching)

The date of the upcoming edit-a-thon at the Amon Carter Museum of American Art in Fort Worth has been changed to October 10, 2015. An event page for the event should be forthcoming shortly. I'll be serving as the technical adviser for the event and your participation would be very much appreciated. I'll let you know when the event page is up. TransporterMan (talk) 18:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC) (Not watching)

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 20:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

Thank you i am the President and sole owner of legitimate incorporation in which we choose to publicly display, for other professional sources to review and or social supporters of our brand to better identify with. What is the problem and how do we reinstate our recently deleted page, and its content as it was shown in its last previous state? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poorstar (talk • contribs) 18:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

I believe the date you have on the Sheena Easton page in her Grammy nominations are in correct.. I could be wrong but I feel confident that I am correct.. I changed the date to correct the error. I thought this was a page where anyone can edit. Why are you singling me out and calling me a vandal? Not a good thing to say or assume Mosquito..

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.39.64.38 (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

TheMesquito,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

4give me, not the right place, no prob your revision my edit, but the point needs to be considered: most technical articles are pitched at way to high a level, with way to much jargon that article was a good example — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

• CaLP communication (talk · contribs)
  • The Cash Learning Partnership (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:The Cash Learning Partnership (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am a volunteer for the Cash Learning Partnership. I've made some edits to the draft CaLP page according the comments which have been made on it before. I'd like to see if those edits qualify the page to be created. Thanks!CaLP communication (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, CodeLyoko. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Inactive list.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mlpearc (open channel) 15:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

I fixed some boringness on your user page, LOL Meth-addict (talk) 07:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

My sincere apologies, TheMesquito. I accidentally blocked your account instead of the account that was trolling your user page. I have of course unblocked your account. Again, please accept my apologies for the mistake. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mesquito, just here to remind you to login to the ACC interface, you're on the dreaded 45 day list. Thanx, - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Ohman, I thought I logged in! TheMesquito^buzz 02:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

NP, thanx - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello , just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface, you're on the dreaded 45 day list. Thanx, - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:00, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello , just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface to avoid account suspension. If you know you're not going to be active it's best to suspend your account, then you just poke a tool admin to re-activate it, just let me know which way you want to go. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 23:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

• MrNikovic (talk · contribs)
  • User:MrNikovic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This material is my own taken from the www.niva.se official page. Melodicrock.com has published this with my permission. I must be able to use my own info, do I ?

MrNikovic (talk) 09:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello CodeLyoko. You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead, or reply to them here using the {{Reply to}} template. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

I need help with getting unblocked from live chat. The reason I was blocked was because I was not listening so please I want unblocked. SparkyHelper (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Disabled helpme, since this seems to be directed at TheMesquito and not a general request for help. Primefac (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

SparkyHelper, as I said in the place you asked last, the ban from the IRC help channel is temporary. You're not banned any more. Please make sure you don't cause the same issues again. Huon (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

No not IRC, I mean greenhouse live chat when I go there it says "Your reported hostname [107.196.245.154] is banned:" I want it unbanned I am sorry for not listening next time I will listen and follow directions SparkyHelper (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

We are in no way affiliated with greenhouse live chat, and thus cannot help you. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks again. With hexchat (under Crouton on Chromebook) I can indeed see the saved channel buffers. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Is your ZNC server down or do I need to investigate other reasons that I can't connect? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

All seems to be working again. Thanks. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, TheMesquito.
I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the New Page Reviewer flag. Would you please consider heading over to PERM and requesting it? (check the flag requirements HERE)
As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag.
Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application.
Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello TheMesquito, just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface to avoid account suspension. If you know you're not going to be active it's best to suspend your account, then you just poke a tool admin to re-activate it, just let me know which way you want to go. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, CodeLyoko. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

• Sent an email because I see you haven't edited for 3 months, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

I have removed your account creator status for inactivity per the request of Dane, an ACC admin. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)