User talk:Cookiemonster1618
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Some suggestion
I noticed you are using mobile edit for most of the edits. I suggest you to use the advanced mode (Advanced Mobile Contributions) to make your editing much easier. I can't imagine not using the advanced mode after 9000 edits.:) Sun8908 Talk 12:36, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank You for your suggestion but mobile editing is much easier for me. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 13:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Somali language official status
why do you keep removing Somaliland from the infobox without explaining why? ~2026-23917-3 (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Your edits were not sourced from a reliable source also Somaliland does not meet the conditions of a separate country yet and is only partially recognized. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 14:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese Americans, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
The removals
kindly asking for the reason for your constant removals without a stated reason, reliable sources are given either directly from the article or trusted sources. Radi3nkida (talk) 20:55, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- I changed it back because the text was written in a way that suggested it was a general fact about all the tribes. There is a lot of variation within the tribes of Sudan, and the language used is somewhat outdated. We need more other reliable sources and information added to attribute if one tribe truly has 1 admixture representing that tribe because in reality there is a lot of variations. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- understandable, and your constant addition of Cushites then?if we need to make it as basic as possible nilo Saharans(especially Nubians), Arabs, and bejas, should be enough,the Coptic component is overall more common than the cushitic one and is sometimes the entirely of the west Eurasian ancestry, cushitic ancestry like I mentioned isn't independent of beja ancestry and thus it'd be like adding semitic people when Arabs are already present. Radi3nkida (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Beja are a speaking Cushitic peoples and Nubians are a Nilo-Saharan speaking peoples many riverine tribes such as Ja'alin, Shaigiya, Rubatab among others in Central Sudan have significant Beja/Nubian admixture and yes there are other Nilo-Saharan speaking groups that have contributed to the genetic pool of many Arab tribes since the article isn't only talking about the 3 main riverine tribes in Sudan but includes all the Arab tribal coalition groups. Copts did not intermarry with Sudanese Arab tribes as they are Christians. You seem to misunderstand what the article is about. I suggest you read the background information to know what it is discussing before adding anymore information. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- the genetic section explicitly mentions a Coptic component in the the northeast Arabs, which if you read more about the nature of Arab migration to Sudan you'll see that many came from Egypt who were already mixed with Copts, the Coptic component might have already been there in nubians as well which is something you need to consider too, bejas are indeed cushitic but they're the only Cushites in Sudan that contributed to the gene pool and many in Sudan don't have any beja ancestry or cushitic ancestry especially in the west, the afro-arabs seem valid is it describes any Arab with substantial sub Saharan ancestry which as the article leads to that the sudanese Arabs are a mixture of Arabs and sub Saharan Africans. Radi3nkida (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- coptic component doesn't necessarily mean coptic admixture and this is negligible. Also there is already a separate Afro Arabs article and Sudanese Arabs do not meet that criteria as Afro-Arabs are Arabs who descend genetically from various African peoples (primarily Bantu groups along the Swahili coast) who live in Arab countries and whose ancestors were enslaved during the Arab slave trade which most Sudanese Arab groups were not. Also did you not read what I said again? The Sudanese Arabs article encompasses all Arab tribes in Sudan not just one section. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Coptic component refers to ancient Egyptian ancestry which is the majority component in Copts, no need to repeat I understand that the article is broad about all western northern and eastern Arabs not just a single section, however this still doesn't justify Cushites when you already added bejas, Nilo Saharans as we mentioned earlier are an exception because of other nilo Saharan groups that contributed to the gene pool, the ancient Egyptian "Coptic like" is necessary because it represents the Arabs from the north who carry this component with significant levels, although it's practically negligible in most but it's still there,for the afro arabs I appreciate your clarification and I wish to reach a common ground,my main problem is mainly with the Cushites as any Cushites aside bejas are practically irrelevant as much as Hebrews despite also being semitic are not relevant when other Arabs are the only relevant ones( hope you understood the analogy) kind regards of course and if I make a mistake help me point it out. Radi3nkida (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- coptic component doesn't necessarily mean coptic admixture and this is negligible. Also there is already a separate Afro Arabs article and Sudanese Arabs do not meet that criteria as Afro-Arabs are Arabs who descend genetically from various African peoples (primarily Bantu groups along the Swahili coast) who live in Arab countries and whose ancestors were enslaved during the Arab slave trade which most Sudanese Arab groups were not. Also did you not read what I said again? The Sudanese Arabs article encompasses all Arab tribes in Sudan not just one section. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- the genetic section explicitly mentions a Coptic component in the the northeast Arabs, which if you read more about the nature of Arab migration to Sudan you'll see that many came from Egypt who were already mixed with Copts, the Coptic component might have already been there in nubians as well which is something you need to consider too, bejas are indeed cushitic but they're the only Cushites in Sudan that contributed to the gene pool and many in Sudan don't have any beja ancestry or cushitic ancestry especially in the west, the afro-arabs seem valid is it describes any Arab with substantial sub Saharan ancestry which as the article leads to that the sudanese Arabs are a mixture of Arabs and sub Saharan Africans. Radi3nkida (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Beja are a speaking Cushitic peoples and Nubians are a Nilo-Saharan speaking peoples many riverine tribes such as Ja'alin, Shaigiya, Rubatab among others in Central Sudan have significant Beja/Nubian admixture and yes there are other Nilo-Saharan speaking groups that have contributed to the genetic pool of many Arab tribes since the article isn't only talking about the 3 main riverine tribes in Sudan but includes all the Arab tribal coalition groups. Copts did not intermarry with Sudanese Arab tribes as they are Christians. You seem to misunderstand what the article is about. I suggest you read the background information to know what it is discussing before adding anymore information. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- understandable, and your constant addition of Cushites then?if we need to make it as basic as possible nilo Saharans(especially Nubians), Arabs, and bejas, should be enough,the Coptic component is overall more common than the cushitic one and is sometimes the entirely of the west Eurasian ancestry, cushitic ancestry like I mentioned isn't independent of beja ancestry and thus it'd be like adding semitic people when Arabs are already present. Radi3nkida (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)