User talk:Creativefrog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajab Tamasha 2023 (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Creativefrog! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajab Tamasha (film) (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 13:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anveshi (2023 film) (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear Aviram, I have searched for genuine sources for the article, and gave them as references for the article. Please tell me Aviram where I went wrong in preparing the article. Please help me. Creativefrog (talk) 06:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajab Tamasha (film) (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dalari (2023 film) has been accepted

Dalari (2023 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Israell (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for accepting the submission Israell. Creativefrog (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dalari (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Dalari instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: We Love Bad Boys (Film) has been accepted

We Love Bad Boys (Film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 08:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for approving the article. I will continue to do my bit of work to help expand Wikipedia. Creativefrog (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ground (film) has been accepted

Ground (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 07:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ajab Tamasha (film)

Hello, Creativefrog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ajab Tamasha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Please review Ram NRI film which I have submitted.

I have added all genuine references for the film article. Can you please tell me when it would be reviewed. Creativefrog (talk) 03:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Hanuman Media for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanuman Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanuman Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello Editor, I have seen that the article 'Hanuman Media' which I have created has been nominated for deletion, and it is under discussion about whether it should exist in the Wikipedia website. I have created this article for one sole purpose - I am person who has been watching movies in OTTs and I have observed that a certain 'Hanuman Media' has been recently actively buying the rights of other language movies and have been dubbing them into Telugu with good quality translation, and as a person who loves watching more movies in my own Telugu language, I wanted to provide this information to the people of other language that 'Hanuman Media' is also there. As a person who suffered with less quality dubbing movies, I like to provide information regarding high quality dubbing. So, I went into the internet and checked in reputed websites like Zeenews, Hansindia, Sakshi, 10tv, and came to a conclusion that this is worthy information to put up in the Wikipedia website. I hope that you will keep this page in the Wikipedia website. Creativefrog (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Shambhala: A Mystical World moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shambhala: A Mystical World. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is too soon and sources do not prove notability.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello admin. This page is regarding a real movie that is being made. I have read about it in genuine sources, and the movie is about to be released in summer of 2025. There is another movie named 'Raja Saab' that is in the shooting process, but a Wikipedia page has been approved for that movie even before it is released. So, I wanted to make a wikipedia page for 'Shambhala: A Mystical World' also. Can you please help me to publish the page in Wikipedia. Creativefrog (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
@Creativefrog Wait and let it be reviewed by AfC users and they will certainly help get it to publishing standards. It looks really good. Once the movie releases, it will be more likely to be published, though an AfC reviewer could decide it is ready sooner. Be patient please. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:57, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Thank you a lot for the reply Ktkvtsh. Will be waiting for your guidance to make the article publishable. Creativefrog (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello Ktkvtsh. Hope you are doing very well. I have recently added an information which I felt is interesting. The heroine is changed before the filmmaking began. Can you please tell me if there is some more information which I need to add in order to make this article suitable for approval. I am looking for your guidance to make this article publishable. Creativefrog (talk) 07:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shambhala: A Mystical World (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Randompersonediting was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Randompersonediting (✍️📚) 05:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello dear admin Randompersonediting,
I realize that the article is not up to publishing standard at this point. Please guide me what to do in order to make the article publishable. The film shooting has recently completed. I will upload reference website links once the movie's teaser and first song are released. Is that ok? Creativefrog (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Dear Admin Randompersonediting,
I have added a new information that a making video of the movie is released, and I resubmitted the page for reviewing. Please kindly looking into the page. Creativefrog (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shambhala: A Mystical World (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Better to wait till close to release date for significant coverage to generate or better till release date for multiple critical reviews that can be added to the page to pass notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Shambhala: A Mystical World

Information icon Hello, Creativefrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shambhala: A Mystical World, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Shambhala: A Mystical World

Hello, Creativefrog. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shambhala: A Mystical World".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ugandhar Muni

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ugandhar Muni, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI