User talk:Datawikiperson

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☩ ^{(Babysharkboss2)} 17:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

I don’t think it’s fair, I just want to remove something in the propaganda page because I feel it’s biased against socialism! Datawikiperson (talk) 07:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Hey there,

There's Apple online store in Indonesia (https://www.apple.com/id/). Can you please add this to the map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Countries_with_Apple_stores.jpg? Thanks! Hakuna Zar (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for the tardy response, but there is no Apple Store in Indonesia. Datawikiperson (talk) 13:14, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Please be aware that all articles related to politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide—are subject to an extended confirmed restriction. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

You are wrong think that the addition of no longer existing airlines was a mistake. In fact, it is another airport vandal who got another range blocked for 8 years. But thanks for alerting me, case is now reported on AIV. The Banner talk 10:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Datawikiperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Not provided

• Blocking administrator: not provided.

---

Decline reason: You have provided no information with your request. Please exactly follow any instructions that you see when you attempt to edit, including providing the IP address or other account namea involved. If you do not want to post your IP address publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to make a private unblock request. I do note that you successfully edited yesterday; if your circumstances have changed since yesterday, that may be the reason for the autoblock. 331dot (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Well, I can’t edit at school, but I can edit at home. Datawikiperson (talk) 12:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Then it is likely that your school's IP address has been blocked (this is not unusual, schools are often responsible for a lot of vandalism). Generally these are blocked for anonymous users only, but sometimes blocking logged-in users is necessary too however without knowing the IP address concerned it is not possible to investigate further. If you are being impacted by an IP block then you might be eligible for Wikipedia:IP block exemption, but again the relevant IP address will need to be supplied. Thryduulf (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Datawikiperson (talk) 10:01, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Qatar, you may be blocked from editing. You are advised to view the talk page of said article. Aleain (talk) 01:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Comment bot. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zzz plant (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Bahrain. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Don't bite. Be mindful and assume good faith. If you are looking for a discussion come back to UAE to talk, instead of bullying here. Best regards Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

I’m not bullying. Datawikiperson (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Škola has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 28 § Škola until a consensus is reached. Zzz plant (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Tandkräm has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 29 § Tandkräm until a consensus is reached. Zzz plant (talk) 23:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

I understand and respect that you are editing the article in good faith, but as you did in the Republic of Korea Armed Forces article, it seems that you are editing it by adding a completely unrelated source, or you are editing it arbitrarily without understanding the timeline of events in the North Korea–South Korea relations article. Please be careful when editing. Gasiseda (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Datawikiperson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Comment bot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rafah, you may be blocked from editing. For removing cited RS without an explicit reason. "Corny" is not a reason. Veggies (talk) 07:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 10:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

You are edit warring at Rafah. You should revert your last 2 revisions. If you do not, the likelihood that your account will be reported and blocked for a while is approximately 100%. There is a discussion on the talk page about the was/is question. You can join that instead of trying to impose your preferred solution. Also, following WP:BRD in the topic area is better than not following it. Sean.hoyland (talk) 13:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Datawikiperson reported by User:Veggies (Result: ). Thank you. Veggies (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing including a 1RR violation and edit summaries treating Wikipedia as a battleground. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Datawikiperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I was not familiar with the rules, also I didn't know there was a discussion taken place. I apologise.

Decline reason:

Per below. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:37, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Datawikiperson (talk) 13:56, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I was not familiar with the rules The 1RR {{Editnotices/Page/Rafah}} pagenotice appears every time you edit the article. It's risible to claim that you didn't know it was there. You did. You just chose to ignore it, to ignore the warning that I gave you when you first removed the citations, and to continue to edit-war while calling the sources you disagreed with as "corny"—which is not a justification for removing RS. -- Veggies (talk) 14:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

By consensus it was there. There is not enough proof to show that Rafah WAS a city. I was just cleaning it up. There was no consensos set by Wikipedia to show that Rafah was a city, plus it is not a conterversial topic. Datawikiperson (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I got thanked twice at that. Datawikiperson (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

How many thanks did you get? Datawikiperson (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Datawikiperson, good edits are subject to the WP:1RR rule where it is in place, unless they fall under one of the edit-warring exemptions, listed at WP:NOT3RR. Right now, your block is only a week, and you retain your extended-confirmed rights, so I think it is in your interest to drop the stick. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2026 (UTC)