User talk:Davidng913

When you make a series of edits with no edit summaries, like these, it's much more difficult for other editors to understand what it is you changed. If you had simply taken the 5 seconds to type out "changed photo" and "added link", I and other editors with the article on our watchlists can quickly see what you did and spend much less time checking edits. You're an experienced editor I see editing fairly often so I generally trust your edits, but please make more of an effort to use edit summaries. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Understood. I often publish too fast before I think so I apologize for this in advance. Davidng913 (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

A majority of your recent edits still lack edit summaries, including at least one reversion of an obviously good-faith edit. 4300streetcar (talk) 02:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

I hate to bother you, but I need some input from someone. I recently remade CNW 1385’s page from scratch, but right now I’m debating over whether or not I should get rid of this photo.

[1] This has been put in categories for the Strasburg Rail Road, but that doesn’t hold up, as sources I’ve recently found state that the wheels were sent directly to the more remote SPEC Machine. It gives me the feeling these aren’t even 1385’s wheels, but I wanted to hear someone else’s thoughts before I do anything about it. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 23:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

May need to look at more photos of the 1385 itself and see if the drivers look identical. Chances are, if they're not of the 1385, whoever uploaded the image had no idea which wheels those belong to and probably slapped a random locomotive onto the file. That's my opinion. Do feel free to ask other people about it. Thanks for reaching out! Davidng913 (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Alright, not a problem. I just want to be sure. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Okay false alarm. It turns out I just found a source that outright said No. 1385's driving wheels were sent to Strasburg. So there's that. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 06:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:WMATA 8000 Series Exterior Rendering.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Avelia Horizon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stylez995 (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page National Airlines Flight 102, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'm reaching out on updates to Union Pacific Railroad ; I posted an updated roster to the Talk page, but it hasn't seem to go anywhere. Would love to work with someone to clean up the page. MJ UnionPacific (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

@MJ UnionPacific: I will work on it ASAP. Davidng913 (talk) 19:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Great! I'd love to work with you on this. MJ UnionPacific (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

The file File:Morrison–Knudsen logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused file. Higher quality version available at File:Morrison-Knudsen Logo, August 1991.svg. Nor realistic encyclopedic reason to retain this one as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

See zh:Category:任天堂Switch 2遊戲, OK? XiXiXi8964 (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

See zh:Category:任天堂Switch 2, OK? XiXiXi8964 (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The diffs in question are here and here. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

As of today June 24, 2025 the R179 is no longer temporarily running on the E train, F train, and R train now it is made up all R160 check this sentences to be fixed:

Description and features

The R179s are numbered 3010–3327. Cars numbered 3010–3049 and 3238–3327 are configured into five-car sets, comprising 130 cars, which are assigned to the A and Rockaway Park Shuttle and are based out of Pitkin Yard. Cars numbered 3050–3237 are configured into four-car sets, comprising 188 cars. Most of them are assigned to the J, M, and Z based out of East New York Yard, while the rest are assigned to the C based out of 207th Street Yard.^[1]: 11 As of March 2025^[update], some R179s from the A and C routes are temporarily assigned to the E, F, and R.^[2] The order replaced all remaining R32s and R42s, which dated to the 1960s and early 1970s.^[1]: 11 The R179s were also the last subway car order to be built by Bombardier Transportation prior to being acquired by Alstom in January 2021.^[3] The R179s are visually very similar to the R143s and R160s, but the three car types are not interoperable with each other due to electrical incompatibilities between them.^[4] 148.76.247.205 (talk) 06:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

As of today June 25, 2025 the R160 is no longer running on the G train now it is made up all R211A/T check this sentences to be fixed:

Description

There are two versions of the R160: the R160A (built by Alstom, numbered 8313–8712, 9233–9802, & 9943–9974) and the R160B (built by Kawasaki, numbered 8713–9232 & 9803–9942).^[5] The two car types differ only in a few ways; both can interoperate with each other. The R160As and the majority of the R160Bs utilize the same traction motors as the R142s, while the rest of the R160Bs utilize traction motors similar to those tested on R143s 8205–8212.^[6] Both versions of the R160s are very similar to the R143s and R179s, but the three car types are not interoperable with each other due to electrical incompatibilities between them.^[7][8][9]

The R160 cars are configured in either four-car sets or five-car sets. 372 R160A cars (8313–8652 & 9943–9974) are configured as four-car sets and maintained at East New York Yard for the BMT Eastern Division. All four-car sets are assigned to the J, M and Z trains, but sets 8313-8376 are able to run on the L alongside the line's fleet of R143s. The remaining 630 R160A cars as well as all R160Bs are configured as five-car sets and maintained at Jamaica Yard for the E, F, G and R trains. 148.76.227.89 (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Also can you fix the click link website on E, F and R train is on it here I just highlighted on the letter:

In early 2025, a disproportionately high number of R160s running on the E, F, and R developed wheel problems as a result of a track defect along one of these routes.^[10] This issue resulted in a shortage of rolling stock that lasted several months; the MTA ultimately bought 3,000 additional sets of wheels, after the R160 wheel replacements exhausted the MTA's supply of spare wheels.^[11] ~2025-42685-03 (talk) 07:04, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Can you please update this picture on the A (New York City Subway service) it was updated this picture on R211 (New York City Subway car) I'll show you which picture to update thanks.

172.254.2.251 (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

I got you! Davidng913 (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:REVEXP, you should explain your recent reversion . A majority of your recent edits are missing edit summaries. 4300streetcar (talk) 01:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Can you please fix the total subway cars is not 605 anymore now is 625 so the number is 530+75+20=625 please fix it thanks. 151.181.202.107 (talk) 02:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

I don't see any plans cancelled on 4014's original tender being converted to carry oil: https://www.facebook.com/RailroadingHeritage/posts/pfbid0YfYYhta9f3tYiViFpcJBvZpfwziTJ4Zeux7wkxiQncnj6bQxygT3CnEdoS76TerGl Trainsfan13 (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

It’s not. It’s the tender swap between 3985 and 4014 that’s cancelled. I kinda saw this coming after 4014 had PTC equipment installed in its current tender (from 3985). Davidng913 (talk) 04:07, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Di Da Di, a link pointing to the disambiguation page BigBang was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 27 February 2026 (UTC)