User talk:Deborah.artemis

Adding an entry to my talk page! Deborah.artemis (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dakota Fanning, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - FlightTime (open channel) 17:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the note Deborah.artemis (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Deborah.artemis. Thank you for your work on The Discovery of Middle Earth: Mapping the Lost World of the Celts. Another editor, Relativity, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Is the review in the "external links" section used to support any of the information in the article? If so, you should use an inline citation in the article (Help:Referencing for beginners can help with this). Also, you'll need more than just one source for this article to meet the notability criteria for books. You're off to a good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Relativity}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

‍Relativity ⚡️ 23:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deborah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exodus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Artemis program is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 03:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Artemis program has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Canadian Football League in the United States, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article On the Beach (1959 film) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MCE89 -- MCE89 (talk) 09:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article On the Beach (1959 film) has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MCE89 -- MCE89 (talk) 10:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Red Dots project, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canadian Football League in the United States, a link pointing to the disambiguation page TSN was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Deborah.artemis, please note that the nominator of an article at GAN may not also open the review page (the link to which is above). That page must only be opened by an independent reviewer. I'm going to arrange for your mistakenly opened review page to be deleted. Please be patient; it can take weeks or months before a reviewer shows up, given that there are currently 671 good article nominations awaiting a reviewer. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:07, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand. Deborah.artemis (talk) 07:13, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

I had to remove your nomination of Ava Gardner for GA because you did not meet the criteria: you are supposed to be a significant contributor (the top 5) in order to qualify. To see it, go to the article's history, then click on "Page statistics". - RTSthestardust (talk) 04:53, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to John L. Hershey. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and require WP:RS, WP:IS. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 16:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, QE. I've updated with some good refs. I can probably track down a few more. Do you have time to do a GA review for the main article on Peter van de Kamp? Deborah.artemis (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Mars Pathfinder has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 10:33, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Peter van de Kamp is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RadioactOlive -- RadioactOlive (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Peter van de Kamp has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RadioactOlive -- RadioactOlive (talk) 07:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)