User talk:Dimawik

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardware random number generator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIPS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Dimawik, the justification you stated for this revert is factually incorrect: Contrary to your claim, there exists no redirect under full entropy, and what's more, your edit also reverted the addition to the "see also" item, to which the attempted justification obviously does not apply. (I also have doubts about the redirect non-physical nondeterministic random bit generator that you did actually create recently, but that would be the matter of a separate RfD debate.)

I assume these were inadvertent oversights rather than a deliberate attempt to mislead. But either way you should try to be a bit more diligent, especially when undoing the work of other editors.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing to my mistake. I will undo my revert, and manually reintroduce the boldface for the non-physical nondeterministic random bit generator. Sorry for the inconvenience caused, please accept my apologies. Dimawik (talk) 06:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you and no worries. Your work to expand Wikipedia's coverage in these topic areas is much appreciated. Regards, HaeB (talk) 00:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

I can see that you already made the changes yourself - thank you. I plan to write the Non-physical nondeterministic random bit generator article, so the redirect is temporary anyhow. Dimawik (talk) 06:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Domain separation (cryptography) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Domain separation (cryptography) until a consensus is reached. Evgeny Kapun (talk) 22:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Dimawik, thanks for the revert - unfortunately, due to time constraints, I only skimmed the paper and quickly misread a section in cryptanalysis. My apologies! DeOxRiNuId (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, there is no issue at all. Dimawik (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Committee on National Security Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee on National Security Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 22:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, in this edit to 1.58-bit large language model you use {{sfn|Wang|Ma|Dong|Huang|2023|p=1}}. Unfortunately there is no such work listed, so readers cannot look up the source, and the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could suppl;y the missing source it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! I have fixed it. Dimawik (talk) 01:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Dimawik. Thanks for your advice.

It was not clear what you meant by not being able to "just move it yourself". I seem to have successfully moved P1619, but I may have created problems. For example:

• Replying to your comment no longer works, so the talk seems to no longer be linked to the page.

• "P1619" and "SISWG" now go to a redirect page and not directly to the new page. How can I fix this? I'd dig more, but it's late at night.

I've rewritten lots of the text in my own words. I'm concerned that the motivations for things like why the 2883 family was developed are not documented outside the SISWG minutes (and not very well there). Since those aren't publicly available, I have no way of providing citations. How much of a problem is this?

I can put back in some of the LRW text. Paul Suhler (talk) 04:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

And now I was able to reply in the Talk section for this page. Please delete this topic here.

Apologies for the hassle. Paul Suhler (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. This one is closed. Dimawik (talk) 19:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the update on RNG. I think your expertise in Cryptopgraphy but the tool you deleted is helpful to researchers for MC simulations for high quality RNG usage. It is not a tool for cryptographic usage. One of its module is Random matrices for physics applications. Hope context helps.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-37026-88 (talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russian Academy, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russkaya Rech was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)