User talk:Doeze

Hello, Doeze, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to List of countries with overseas military bases does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Iryna Harpy (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Omnic Crisis Sydney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jair Bolsonaro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

If you want to change the language of the article, or if you think something isn't quite right, use the talk page and try to get a WP:CON with other editors. Pay attention to WP:NEUTRAL and WP:BLP, and always use sources. Coltsfan (talk) 20:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

yk im right Doeze (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dajare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuru (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello! I see that you created this redirect page. I'm interested in this issue, would you give citation to it? I couldn't find anything on the net about it, all seem to be copies of the wikipedia mention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.66.250.41 (talk) 14:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

You're correct it does seem to stem from this mention. There is also little mention of the Portuguese phrase "reversão metropolitana". I took it from the phrase in the lead section, which dates back to the creation of the article in 2009 by User:Calliopejen1. Doeze (talk) 22:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuclear power in space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ginga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mach number into Hypersonic speed. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Square packing, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Square packing, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of nuclear power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S1W.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuclear reactor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages F-1 and FOM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castle Bravo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fusion power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transmutation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:HH70 tokamak plasma, 2024.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuclear fission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criticality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German nuclear program during World War II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katanga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Arab Cold War

added a link pointing to Green Line

Technology during World War II

added a link pointing to Rocketry

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fusion power, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NIF and Z machine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of nuclear technology treaties. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

You have been reverted now discuss. Slatersteven (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

I think leaving the article as it is is misleading, because discussing all US and Russian sharing without mentioning the UK leaves the mistaken impression, especially to readers at a glance, that no sharing occurs there. At the very least it should be included as a separate sentence. The ambiguity in the title "List of states with nuclear weapons" requires discussion of these issues, and the UK being the only "state with nuclear weapons" in both aspects of the phrase seems very relevant to the lead. Doeze (talk) 14:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Discuss on the article talk page, not here. Slatersteven (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

You also really need to read wp:editwar. Slatersteven (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

I made the third edit because you expressed no issue with the alphabetization and redlinking. Apart from that, making one revert doesn't really qualify you to bring up WP:EW. Doeze (talk) 14:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Which is why I didn't revert it, but it is still a revert. Slatersteven (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Would you be interested in co-nominating this article at FAC? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:42, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes I would. I think a few changes could be also be added to maximize scope, which I will write on the talk page. Doeze (talk) 19:38, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuclear proliferation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Can you explain why you made this edit? Northern Moonlight 19:56, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

There was clearly some error when deconflicting an interfering vandalizing edit, probably due to high edit traffic. I was writing at the bottom of the lead, the spelling fix to "empress regnant". Doeze (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Oh I see. Carry on then. Northern Moonlight 20:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Doeze (talk) 20:08, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atomic Bombing of New York, Chesley Bonestell, 1948.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 23:18, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nuclear triad, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Oreshnik missile sub-munitions impacting Dnipro, Ukraine, November 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palestine and weapons of mass destruction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestine and weapons of mass destruction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soviet Union and weapons of mass destruction, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mustard and VX.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sixth-generation fighter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interceptor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Doeze: I was looking your good looking giant article and reviewing it as part of WP:NPP process. Its an excellent article but are you planning to put proper attribution in and get rid of those excerpt templates. That are not that standard. I noticed also that only Kendall 2009 and Salem 2014 are used in the bib section. You cant those references until the excerpts are gone. Its getting there though. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 12:17, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I moved a lot of the excerpts over, removed old refs, and added more details today. I'd welcome any other insights you might've had. Doeze (talk) 01:51, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Kingdom and weapons of mass destruction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plague.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Doeze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of nuclear technology treaties, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. Saw some of your recent edits (I don't remember which now). Good job! We should give positive reinforcement to our constructive editors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:34, 23 January 2026 (UTC) To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:25, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

@7&6=thirteen thanks but can i know what prompted this Doeze (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

I recognized good work. (Don't presently remember the stimulus.) We should positively reinforce our constructive editors. Unfortunately, Wikipedia tends to be more into punishment. I can't change that, but ... 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:05, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

cool thanks :) Doeze (talk) 15:15, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of nuclear technology treaties, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soviet Union and weapons of mass destruction, a link pointing to the disambiguation page R-12 was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page United States Army, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Diff/1325688677 added a sentence to the lede beginning The U.S. occupation Emperor Hirohito. I think the text "The U.S. occupation" doesn't belong there, but maybe you remember what you intended. Apocheir (talk) 04:51, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

@Apocheir i think i have edited it to make sense now thanks :) Doeze (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Iseult ^Δx talk to me 17:27, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nuclear program of Iran, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Embassy of China, Belgrade, following US bombing, May 8, 1999.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. tjd (he) ^T/C 03:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

As you no doubt already know, the sentence in the article Hirohito that we discussed these past few days has been edited, as agreed in the talk page. This message is solely to explain that I understood Emiya1980 to have requested the change of the word "extent" to "degree," and to use the same word throughout the sentence, although it seems the request was to swap the order of the two words (please note that English is not my native language, and upon reading the request to change "extent" to "degree," I interpreted it as I just explained). This small oversight has been corrected, but I thought it appropriate to apologize to both of you. Best regards. Ulises Laertíada (talk) 05:18, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, no worries. Doeze (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, for future reference, please refrain from wikilinking nationality in the lede, as you did for Kim Jong Un in this edit. It is discouraged due to MOS:OL, specifically the part where it mentions that "Nationalities, ethnicities or identities (e.g., British, Japanese, Turkish, African American, Nigerian)" should generally not be wikilinked. Thanks. SpyroeBM (talk) 06:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

@SpyroeBM compare Stalin, Mao Zedong, Fidel Castro Doeze (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

@Doeze Okay, what is your point exactly? You linked "North Korean" at the start of the lede, which similar to all examples, the nationality part at the very start of the lede should not be wikilinked. From your example, Mao does not have "Chinese" linked at the start of the lede for reasons relating to MOS:OL. This is common practice across Wikipedia as links to nationality straight of the bat is often distracting and unnecessary. SpyroeBM (talk) 16:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

@SpyroeBM You're right, linking it as nationality is not ideal. But I think a link to North Korea should be in the first few lines of the lead per those examples. Doeze (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

There was a discussion about the amount of detail in World oil market chronology from 2003. This means short-term changes go in other articles. In this case, 2026–2028 world oil market chronology.

Would you like to contribute?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page United States Army, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Doeze. Thank you for your work on Nuclear gravity bomb. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page, best seen as a daughter article of Nuclear weapon#Gravity bomb. It is quite short, so there is the question of whether it is better merged for context. However, Nuclear weapon is quite long! The article is clearly written and appropriately structured.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Submarine-launched ballistic missile, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your recent overhaul of the Dongfen DF-4 ends by saying that the warhead was called "512 (sic). Was it really "512? Did you mean 512, or "512"? None of the sources I can find give a name for the warhead. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry that was a typo, the warhead is just 512. The reason none of the sources name it is probably because the recent 2025 book by Hui Zhang is very thorough at uncovering previously unclear details of the program. Doeze (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Navy, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Elizabeth-class was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:06, 22 March 2026 (UTC)