User talk:Donner60
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I may be offline for a few days at various times over the next six weeks. It is a busy time for me in RL. I think I will be online most days, but may not be able to spend a large amount of time most days. I will do my best to keep up with coordinator tasks and not let things pile up. Donner60 (talk) 08:37, 14 March 2026 (UTC)


I have added a prioritized to do list to my user page. These have been getting done much more slowly than intended because of coordinator tasks and other unanticipated editing that needed more immediate attention. Donner60 (talk) 05:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
New messages, questions, comments and replies (or not)
Please put new messages at the very bottom of the page.
To clarify:
- The new item should not be below this message and not below the message about this in the collapsible section but at the very bottom of the page after every other item on the page.
- Add a section heading, identify the article you are concerned with (if your question or comment refers to a specific article), use a link so I can find it more quickly.
- Sign your edit with four tildes (~~~~) so I know to whom to reply.
- Keep an eye on this page. You should be notified here and continue any discussion here if I click the reply box when responding - which I will do unless there is something unusual about the post. I will add a ping if I think it is necessary. I may respond on your talk page if I think that would be helpful to expedite communications.
- Note that as far as I know, IP addresses/temporary user accounts (which are numbers), can not be pinged so checking back here will be necessary to continue communications.
- When I notice an out of order question or comment, I will move it to the bottom of the page and provide a heading if there is none already.
Related information: I may not reply to (but will try to thank for) messages which I think are just for my information and do not appear to call for a reply.
If you have come here for information, or to complain about something in a civil manner, please read the information at the pertinent links in the collapsed sections, which expands some on the points mentioned above - at least if you are unfamiliar with posting talk page messages.
I will not respond to vandalism, disruptive, uncivil, insulting, abusive or nonsensical posts. I will simply delete them but depending on their nature, I may post a vandalism warning on your talk page. This was especially pertinent when I was doing more vandalism patrolling since such messages occurred from time to time. I suppose such a message could possibly still be left for any number of other reasons.
Post a note/comment if you send an e-mail
If you send me an e-mail please leave a talk page notice in a new section at the bottom of the page. Note: I am not always prompt at looking for new e-mails at the listed address so you are more likely to get a reply, or a quicker reply by notifying me on this page that you have sent an e-mail to me. In most cases, unless the message is confidential, I am likely to be informed the fastest, and reply more quickly if the message is left as a new section below. Thanks.
Current talk page items follow these sections.
User Talk page policies and guidelines |
|---|
|
• Help:Introduction to talk pages. • Help:Using talk pages. • Excerpts Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages: While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia. Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. This specifically includes both registered and unregistered users. There are certain types of notices that users may not remove from their own talk pages, such as declined unblock requests and speedy deletion tags. See Wikipedia:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings for full details. User talk pages are subject to the general user page guidelines on handling inappropriate content—see Wikipedia:User pages#Handling inappropriate content.
From the section Editing comments, Other's comments in Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines:
Note that it is proper to use |
Messages at bottom of page and my replies or no reply |
|---|
|
Put messages at the very bottom of this page, please. I have noted in bullet points above the guidelines for good messages in general and for this page in particular If messages are placed elsewhere (unless they are replies to a reply message that I have left in an existing section), I may either not see them or at least not see them very promptly. That will delay any reply from me to you. If you put a question or comment on this page but not at the bottom of the page despite the above request, and you can not find it if you check back, I have moved it to the bottom of the page in a new section with an appropriate heading if there was none given to the message. As far as I know, IP addresses cannot be pinged. When I notice a question or comment that was not placed at the bottom of the page, I will move it to the bottom of the page and provide a heading if there is not already a heading. If your edit was vandalism, disruptive, uncivil, abusive or nonsensical, and you do not find the edit on this page, it is because I have deleted it. If the edit is vandalism or otherwise abusive, in most such cases, I will also put a warning (or another warning if I have already placed a warning for vandalism) on your talk page, but will not otherwise reply to it. Note that I cannot reply to a message which is incomplete or otherwise cannot be understood or reviewed on another linked page. If I do not reply to your message, but do not delete it or have archived it, it is likely because I took it to be a statement rather than a question or message that called for a reply. If some time has passed since I have logged on, a message may have become stale, or appear to me to be stale or no longer in need of a reply for some reason. In those cases, I also may not reply and will likely simply archive the message at the next archiving on aging messages/replies. |
Barnstars and awards before July 6, 2025 are at User:Donner60/Barnstars. Some of the earlier ones kept here may be shown there as well.
In appreciation
| The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
| This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Flavian dynasty retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC) |
Appreciated guidance and review
— Milwaukee911 (talk) 07:25, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
In appreciation
| The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
| This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your truly outstanding work in helping Battles of Lexington and Concord retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC) |
In appreciation
| The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
| This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Edward Porter Alexander retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC) |
In appreciation
| The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
| This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Siege of Fort William Henry retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:01, 11 August 2025 (UTC) |
Congratulations!
| The Coordinator stars | ||
| On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your election to the position of Coordinator, I take great pleasure in presenting you with the Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best of luck for the coming year! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:53, 30 September 2025 (UTC) |
In appreciation
| The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
| This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping P. G. T. Beauregard retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
In appreciation
| The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
| This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Siege of Yorktown retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC) |
Mediator Barnstar
![]() |
The Mediator Barnstar | |
| For your efforts in fairly mediating a lengthy and drawn-out dispute on Battle of Maritsa, which ended in a suitable compromise thanks to your suggestions. Keep up the good work! Botushali (talk) 08:31, 31 October 2025 (UTC) |
Congratulations from the Military History Project
| Military history service award | ||
| On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your performance - 95 points - in the November 2025 Article Improvement Drive with this award. Congratulations! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC) |
November 2025 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
|
Citation Barnstar | ||
|
This award is given in recognition to Donner60 for collecting more than 4 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV25 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 6,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:30, 22 December 2025 (UTC) |
WP:GAR Barnstar
| The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
| For Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Battle of Long Island/1. TompaDompa (talk) 00:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC) |
Military Historian of the Year - Runner up
| The Silver Wiki Congratulations! You have been selected in second place for the Military Historian of the Year by a popular vote of your peers in recognition of your contributions to the English Wikipedia's coverage of military history. On behalf of the coordinators of WikiProject Military history, it is my pleasure to present the esteemed Silver Wiki. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:11, 30 December 2025 (UTC) |
Congratulations from the Military History Project
| Military history reviewers' award | ||
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between October and December 2025. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2026 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space |
The Signpost: 17 February 2026
- In the media: Global powers see Wikipedia as fundamental target for manipulation
Attempted Wikipedia shenanigans apparent from Epstein, AI, various governments.
- News and notes: Discussions open for the next WMF Annual Plan
Plus, WikiFlix going places, steady progress on older FAs and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- Serendipity: Maintenance crews continue to slog through Wikipedia's oldest Featured Articles
Hundreds of old FAs have been triaged since project began, but thousands remain — and they need reviewers.
- Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
- Technology report: Wikidata Graph Split and how we address major challenges
A personal perspective on a major update to the Wikimedia social machine.
- Traffic report: Deaths, killings, films, and the Olympics
I'll have the usual!
- Opinion: Incoming Incurables
A poem for Wikipedia Day 2026.
- Crossword: Pop quiz
Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?
- Comix: herculean
efforts.
Good Article Gazette, Issue 12

| Ongoing discussions | News | Current statistics |
|---|---|---|
|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 238, February 2026
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2026
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

- Following an RfC, the web archival service archive.today has been deprecated; links to the site should be removed.
- A request for comment is open to discuss retiring CSD criterion R3 in favour of handling such redirects through RfD.
- Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
- Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
- The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.
- Following the 2026 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: A09, AmandaNP, Barras, Count Count, M7, SHB2000, Teles and VIGNERON.
- An Unreferenced articles backlog drive is taking place in March 2026 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome Donner60! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
Cielquiparle (talk) 21:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 March 2026
- Interview: Bernadette Meehan, new Wikimedia Foundation CEO
Part 2.
- News and notes: Security testing unleashes computer worm on Meta-wiki
Dormant worm awakes; a sketchy archiving site struck; ether burns.
- Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?
- In the media: Indonesian government blocks Wikimedia logins; archive site scoured from Wikipedia after owner runs malware
As well as controversy over LLM translations.
- Recent research: To wiki, perchance to groki
Comparisons continue.
- Obituary: Madhav Gadgil, Fredrick Brennan, Mark Miller, Chip Berlet
Rest in peace.
- Opinion: Interface administrators and trusting trust
Potential attacks are the logical consequence of giving a group of users unlimited control over JavaScript.
- Technology report: English Wikipedia deprecates archive.today after DDoS against blog, altered content
After the archive site launched a DDoS campaign against a small blog in January 2026, a request for comment was started, with consensus to deprecate the site used almost 700 thousand times.
- Op-ed: Why is "Trypsin-sensitive photosynthetic activities in chloroplast membranes" cited in "List of tallest buildings in Chicago"?
The answer is slop.
- Essay: The pursuit of a button click
Volunteering for Wikipedia has its rewards. The thank-button, for example.
- In focus: Short descriptions: One year later
A discussion of the challenge set forth to the Wikipedia community one year ago!
- WikiProject report: Unreferenced articles backlog drive
Unreferenced articles in English Wikipedia - help us in the backlog drive!
- Community view: Speaking of planning ...
The WMF planning process is underway.
- Traffic report: Over the mountain, kissing silver inlaid clouds
Death and the Winter Olympics.
- Crossword: "It will never happen"
Want to take a break?
- Comix: BRIEn't
Or is it.
Books & Bytes – Issue 73
Issue 73, January–February 2026
- Four new partnerships
- User survey thanks
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
(This message was sent to User:Donner60 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
James City CW Battle
Thanks for your comments and help a few months earlier. I finally made some more edits and submitted it for review if you have time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Battle_of_James_City
I think James City might be added to the Bristoe campaign now. I'm not familiar with the term for the Wiki "grouping/name" for a campaign.
I really appreciate your help and comments earlier. Qstor2 (talk) 13:55, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- I will take a look at the article within the next day or two unless something delays me. I want to be more careful than I was with another reply recently which I did not get exactly right. "Grouping/name" does not ring a bell with me, but I may have forgotten it or think of it under another term. Did you see it on a page you can point out? Campaign may be described or defined on a project page but I would need to think about where to look for it. Closeness in time of the progression of battles and movement of armies may have something to do with it. I am reasonably sure that most, if not all, Civil War campaign names have been placed on a series of battles and movements by historians, and possibly contemporaries, for quite some time and they probably used names of a major battle within these movements. A few such as Peninsula, Antietam, Gettysburg and several others come to mind. Donner60 (talk) 07:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 239, March 2026
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2026 (UTC)


