User talk:慈居

What is the point of this edit? Why should that particular section heading be the only one in the article that makes that particular use of capitalization, and why should this be different from the usage prescribed in WP:MOS? Michael Hardy (talk) 06:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for this, I undid your edit just because I saw the 'Joseph-Louis Lagrange' table in the head does not work in your version, but now I see there's no error in your version when I check history. I didn't realize there can be a brief error even when the source is correct. So I didn't check the change of your version just undid and thought someone may redo your edit (except the error in the head). Doyoon1995 (talk) 07:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Interval (mathematics) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. D.Lazard (talk) 13:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

I did what I have to do since you were removing referenced contents out of some personal doubts (). If you want to call it an edit war, you were also a participant. 慈居 (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

If I had to choose which one of you two was the worse edit warrior, I'd pick the one who leaves either no edit summaries or edit summaries that insult the opposing party. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

@Drmies I don't remember me insulting or being insulted. I'm used to leaving edit summaries only occasionally because that's the most common practice in my home Wikimedia project. If that's not acceptable here I can of course start to leave a summary for each of my edits. 慈居 (talk) 18:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes please. Drmies (talk) 21:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi 慈居. Thank you for your work on Abel–Dini–Pringsheim theorem. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi 慈居. Thank you for your work on Balanced group. Another editor, Fermiboson, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, I'm not familiar with topology, but in Topological_group#Uniform_space it appears to state that the left and right uniform structures coincide if(f?) the group is abelian. Could you clarify in this context how balanced differs from abelian?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fermiboson}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Fermiboson (talk) 15:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

@Fermiboson: Hello! You're right that the two uniformities coincide if the group is abelian. This sufficient condition is not necessary; I will try and add a note about this in a while. Best regards. 慈居 (talk) 15:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi 慈居. Thank you for your work on Topological functor. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for making an article on this topic. Suggest more explanatory wording. Currently somebody who can understand the current explanation probably already knows what a topological functor is and would not be the reader. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, North8000! Thank you for your review and suggestion. I will consider adding more explanation when I can. Best regards. 慈居 (talk) 00:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 03:36, 10 September 2025 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked, please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Closed preordered set requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

–DMartin (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Closed preordered set has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 9 § Closed preordered set until a consensus is reached. –DMartin (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, 慈居,

Thank you for creating Saturated set (intersection of open sets).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

With only one reference, and that being tangential, there's not enough to demonstrate notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Closed preordered set is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closed preordered set until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Klbrain (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2026 (UTC)