User talk:Dyzca23

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please also see WP:ECREXPLAIN. R3YBOl (🌲) 12:10, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dyzca23 You've violated WP:GS/KURD again. please read WP:GS/KURD.. Here's what it says; ::A community discussion at the administrators' noticeboard has placed all pages with content related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly interpreted, under the extended confirmed restriction, effective 03:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC). ::Extended confirmed restriction: only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area, subject to the following provisions: ::The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed, with the following exceptions: ::Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administrators may take enforcement actions described in "B" or "C" below. However, non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even within the "Talk:" namespace. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, RMs, and noticeboard discussions. ::Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required. R3YBOl (🌲) 14:10, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Whats the big deal with WPGS Kurd? Mind explain why we need those rules? Dyzca23 (talk) 15:17, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Disruptive editing for a long time. In any case you must stop. Doug Weller talk 16:16, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Alright my apologies. Dyzca23 (talk) 16:44, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

If you're interested in reading about what the "last straw" that led to the extended-confirmed restriction being imposed, the discussion is here. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:00, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the listed references that I checked used the term "Petrosism". Is this draft AI-generated?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petrosism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:12, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

it was stated in the article, that it isn’t an official term, but rather an term used a lot on TikTok and social media by nationalists. I asked ChatGPT to fix my grammar in the text, so yes you could say I used ai. And those sources contribute to the meaning of petrosism, which is just extreme nationalism. Dyzca23 (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Dyzca23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:12, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Assyrian, Chaldean, Aramean, and Syriac identity, culture, and politics. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:03, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

The page Ashitha Revolt has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:06, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

ill take the topicban Dyzca23 (talk) 18:32, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dyzca23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I’m not a meat/sock puppet of that etcnoel guy, if I’m gonna be honest I found Ashitha revolt on a random wiki site and copied the code thought I would get away with it, and it was probably a mistake what I did, but I can assure you in everyday possible I’m not a sockpuppet, I have no connections to your guy whatsoever. Dyzca23 (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Closing duplicate request. asilvering (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If true, this is also completely unacceptable behavior in a contentious topic, and I see no route to being unblocked without, at minimum, accepting a topic ban from WP:GS/ACAS. Another admin will review this request. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:41, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Note that there’s a notable degree of overlap between the two on the Simple English Wikipedia as well. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Dyzca23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I will accept topic ban such as Assyrian-Chaldean-Aramean-Syriac, and I do NOT know etcnoel or have any connections to him as I stated, I’m just very interested in Assyrian history, and I’ll take a topicbans from whatever you’d like. Dyzca23 (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I will accept topic ban such as [[Assyrian-Chaldean-Aramean-Syriac]], and I do NOT know etcnoel or have any connections to him as I stated, I’m just very interested in Assyrian history, and I’ll take a topicbans from whatever you’d like. [[User:Dyzca23|Dyzca23]] ([[User talk:Dyzca23#top|talk]]) 23:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will accept topic ban such as [[Assyrian-Chaldean-Aramean-Syriac]], and I do NOT know etcnoel or have any connections to him as I stated, I’m just very interested in Assyrian history, and I’ll take a topicbans from whatever you’d like. [[User:Dyzca23|Dyzca23]] ([[User talk:Dyzca23#top|talk]]) 23:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will accept topic ban such as [[Assyrian-Chaldean-Aramean-Syriac]], and I do NOT know etcnoel or have any connections to him as I stated, I’m just very interested in Assyrian history, and I’ll take a topicbans from whatever you’d like. [[User:Dyzca23|Dyzca23]] ([[User talk:Dyzca23#top|talk]]) 23:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

A topic ban from WP:GS/ACAS would mean that you couldn't write about (or even mention) Assyrian history anymore. Just want to make sure you understand what you're agreeing to here. -- asilvering (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

00:48, 20 February 2026 (UTC) 00:48, 20 February 2026 (UTC) User:asilvering Hello, Thank you for reviewing lifting my ban. I understand that my actions violated Wikipedia's rules on puppetry. I have read the guidelines here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GS/ACAS and I will follow them strictly going forward. I will contribute constructively and respect all Wikipedia policies, as i said ill take a topic ban from it. --Dyzca23 (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

@Rosguill, does that sound good to you? I can believe "actually, I copyvio'd from another wiki" pretty easily, to be honest. -- asilvering (talk) 05:10, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't buy it. First, I can't seem to find any off-wiki mirrors of the Ashitha revolt article; second, if they had simply copied a mirror of Ashitha Revolt of 1843, why would the new article be at a different title? Finally, I find the combination of I will accept topic ban such as Assyrian-Chaldean-Aramean-Syriac followed by I understand that my actions violated Wikipedia's rules on puppetry. I have read the guidelines here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GS/ACAS and I will follow them strictly going forward. to come off as disingenuous: I think Dyzca23 is desperately trying to tell us what they think we want to hear, rather than actually expressing sincere intentions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:02, 15 March 2026 (UTC)