User talk:Electron230

Please only add people with their own article to lists of people. You have been adding redirects. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Weren't the people I added already notable enough to have their own article though? Electron230 (talk) 22:21, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Maybe, maybe not, but right now they are just redirects. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:32, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

What's the problem with redirects? Electron230 (talk) 02:43, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Please don't edit war over this, as you have at List of people from California. If the person was notable, they would have their own article. Please discuss before reverting again. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

For most of the redirects I added it wasn't the person that was notable, but rather their disappearance Electron230 (talk) 02:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Chicago appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at São Francisco de Assis, Rio Grande do Sul, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 16:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Civiasco, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Somepinkdude (talk) 03:06, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Liverpool Maternity Hospital, you may be blocked from editing. Dormskirk (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2001 in science fiction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:26, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2008 in science fiction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:27, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 in science fiction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tuesden (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2005 in science fiction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tuesden (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2003 in science fiction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tuesden (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Logan, Utah. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Electron230. Thank you for your work on Gpt4.1. Another editor, CostalCal, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Next time you create a redirect on Wikipedia, you shouldn't add: </ nowiki>. Thank you!}} To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|CostalCal}}

. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CostalCal (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Electron230. Thank you for your work on 2026 in science fiction. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:GNG. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)