User talk:Emayeah

GiantSnowman 08:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

guh i had this account for 3 years lol, thanks tho Emayeah (talk) 08:13, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neovim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neovim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 01:51, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

aight, sure enough Emayeah (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I saw you were making improvements to the article for C, namely and . You marked them both as minor edits, but I'm not sure it applies. A prior, the first edit can be argued to be minor, but the second one is changing content. Due to it being a, undo of an undo, I would also say it shouldn't be considered minor.

Also, If someone undoes your edit the best place to find consensus is the article's talk page, not in the edit summaries of further undoes. One strategy I really like is the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle.

Sorry for the drive-by and happy editing.

P.S. For what its worth, I like the edits; The lead is better today than it was two days ago. — xo Ergur (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

gotcha :) Emayeah (talk) 11:11, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Catania–Fontanarossa Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:18, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

acknowledged 👍 (I forgot to reply earlier, whoopsie) Emayeah (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Emayeah, and thanks for your work in fighting vandalism. Might I suggest you enable Twinkle? It's a very useful tool that (among other things) makes it easier for you to revert unconstructive edits, give user warnings, and report especially problematic users to Administrator intervention against vandalism. Chess enjoyer (talk) 11:14, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

thanks, I will check it out! :) Emayeah (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, although it is a fun and easy gadget, please be considerate in your use of the tool. For example, a PROD tag CANNOT be reinstated. Thank you. ~2026-47538-0 (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-47538-0 oh my bad, acknowledged! :) Emayeah (talk) 12:58, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

No problem, it would have been contested anyway. ~2026-47538-0 (talk) 13:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)