User talk:Emiya1980

The current company was a merger-of-equals between NSC and Sumitomo Metal that created a new company under the combined name with the stock symbol carrying over from the original NSC. The previous incarnation of NSC was a separate company that was ultimately dissolved and integrated into NS&SM when the merger happened. For more information, see NSC's page on the Japanese Wikipedia. VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 21:15, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

@VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004: That may be the case. However, based on how it is currently written, the article seems to center around the history of both the Nippon Steel originating in 1970 and the current version of said company. Hence why I have included information from both companies in the infobox. Emiya1980 (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

@VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004: With regards to recent edits, Yawata Iron & Steel was founded in 1950. Not Nippon Steel Corporation. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:40, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

but per Yawata Iron & Steel's page on the Japanese Wikipedia, the company itself was founded in 1950 is the company that is currently Nippon Steel. The original NSC merger was structured with Yawata Iron & Steel merging with Fuji Iron & Steel with the former rebranding itself. This is causing a lot of confusion, is there any way to figure this out? VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 04:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Contrary to what the Wikipedia page says, the company was never known as Nippon Steel until 2019. In the 1970 merger which supposedly first gave rise to the first incarnation of "Nippon Steel", the name it had was "New Japan Steel". Since most of the article is currently devoted towards the company's tenure as "New Japan Steel", I think the 1970 merger should be listed as the founding date for now. Once the article has expanded enough to include at least as much about the company during its tenure as "Nippon Steel", then it's probably high time to split the article into two pages (one on "New Japan Steel", the other on "Nippon Steel"). Emiya1980 (talk) 04:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

This might be a great idea to split the pages into three to serve as English counterparts for the pages for Yawata Iron & Steel, NSC and Nippon Steel on the Japanese Wikipedia... VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 04:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Perhaps, I would submit it for discussion on the talk page before taking action. Emiya1980 (talk) 04:43, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

thanks for the advice, hope this decision helps... VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 04:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your extensive contributions to Soviet articles. Saitzken (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Emiya, please don't reopen that discussion again. The previous close wasn't wrong, per se, because the standard time to close is seven days, and any additional time has to be placed via relist. If you contact the closer, you may be able to request a relist, and they'll probably give it to you. Just ask them and let them do their thing. Ladtrack (talk) 04:05, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

I've already done so. Emiya1980 (talk) 04:57, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

@Ladtrack: I was refused. Now what? Emiya1980 (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Well, you've got a couple options. One is to submit a move review, saying that you felt that a closure was premature and the discussion should be relisted. They may or may not give it to you, but if you really want this discussion reopened, that's the way to do it. The other option is to just wait a month or two and do another request. That option probably has a higher chance of success, especially if you include all the stuff you told me in the request. Ladtrack (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gladys M. Phipps.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   15:28, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. The procedure also applies to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Please also note that the Consensus required provision applies on the Nicolás Maduro article. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:34, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Emiya, I wouldn't want you to walk away feeling as though your arguments haven't been addressed so I'm going to have a go. It's clear from the context of when Maxime Weygand used the term the "Battle of France" in 1940 that he meant the "Battle for France" and not the "battle on French territory". Similarly, the Battle of Britain (i.e. the "Battle for Britain") included engagements over the English Channel but it wouldn't be sensible nor accurate to the history to split this into a separate article. While Maurice Gamelin held the position of 'Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Armies in France', this also gave him command of Belgian troops and that command didn't disappear once the French and British had crossed the Belgian border. I appreciate that the names given to historical events are rarely optimal but this textualism about territory wasn't important to the Allies at the time and it thus can't be important now. Thanks. Joko2468 (talk) 14:00, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

@Joko2468: I will research what RS say on the matter later this week. I will follow up with you regarding my findings next week. Is that fair?Emiya1980 (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Ofcourse but to supercede the ones already there you'll likely need a WP:BESTSOURCE, or several more sources. Joko2468 (talk) 10:02, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John L. Loeb.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Please excuse my oversight in editing the sentence in the article Hirohito: English is not my native language, and I only understood that you wanted to change the second "extent" to "degree," and I didn't realize that you intended to swap both words in their places in the sentence. In any case, I don't see a problem with that. Best regards, and again, I apologize for this minor oversight. Ulises Laertíada (talk) 03:27, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

No worries. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)