User talk:EnkelEhrenberg

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Germany are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. veko. (user | talk | contribs) 20:12, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hans Ehrenberg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 20:42, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hans Ehrenberg and Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Donald Albury 14:18, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:The Holocaust, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 01:46, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Freedom of expression during dictatorship and thereafter is not inappropriate on any talk page related to Word War two. Same for any and every Dictator (other than Trump) EnkelEhrenberg (talk) 01:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Philosophy. Acroterion (talk) 01:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

please test your idea with Hitler is utterly inappropriate. Acroterion (talk) 01:49, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

It's an adequate test of the idea.EnkelEhrenberg (talk) 01:51, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 02:14, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Talkpages are for specific, referenced suggestions for article improvement, and are definitely not for your observations on what would appeal to Hitler. Acroterion (talk) 02:15, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

You're specialized on the Military, so you have reasons to be nervous, indeed (Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Germany, Japan). Too many wars and too much killing and collateral damage. Reviewing is done by three independent reviewers co-ordinated by an Editor. EnkelEhrenberg (talk) 02:29, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 23:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

please test your idea with Hitler remains a completely inappropriate use of article talkpages. Acroterion (talk) 23:57, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:President of Germany, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 23:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Cold War. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)