User talk:Erakilos

Hi Erakilos. Thank you for your work on Haveli of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:12, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Erakilos (talk) 07:14, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I have contested the speedy deletion of Sunny Jorge. The article contains multiple independent reliable sources including The Source, AllHipHop, Forbes, and NJMS Pulse (official Rutgers New Jersey Medical School publication, Summer 2023, page 25). I believe this meets WP:GNG and does not qualify for A7. I would appreciate your review before deletion. Thank you. TheGfromMTL (talk) 07:58, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Erakilos. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Josip Brusic, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Competing at the 2026 Winter Olympics is a credible claim of improtance. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:49, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Erakilos. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sunny Jorge, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Coveraged in AllHipHop represents a credible claim of importance. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Erakilos. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Daniel Dombrowe, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Founding Baltic Soul Weekender is a credible claim of importance. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

First marked for speedily deletion, now moved to draft. That article is conform to german wikipedia, but here now troubleshootings? What exactly do you want me to do on this article now? Mirko Marhenke (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

The article was not speedy deleted because it had a "claim" of notability. I’ve moved it to Draft so you can incubate it. It currently needs more reliable sources and more inline citations for verification. For example, you’ve listed over a dozen projects in the BLP, but without sources. There are also concerns about a possible conflict of interest, and parts of the article appear machine-translated. Once you’ve improved the page, you can submit it for review, and it'll be moved back to the main space. – Erakilos (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Erakilos. Thank you for your work on Tomb of Abdul Nabi Khan. Another editor, Orange sticker, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Interesting topic, thanks for adding

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Orange sticker}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Orange sticker (talk) 13:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Erakilos (talk) 14:53, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Erakilos, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of A Night in 2005, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This should not have been draftified at all. There is atleast one source in the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry about the db tag; I realized you were working on the page, so I removed the db templates. I still think moving it to draft was reasonable, since it had only one source (I moved it for needing more sources for verification) and you were still working on it. Erakilos (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

No, draftifying an ongoing work is discouraging both to new editors and established ones. The reason I am objecting your draftification was that when you tagged it for deletion, there was no source. But I have added a source before you draftified it; it therefore means that you might have wished all new articles be perfect before they can be in the article space. I looked into your contributions and saw that you often draftify, some with a good reason, others, no. Please always give time to editors because Wikipedia itself is an ongoing project

Thanks! SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:23, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I am indeed under the impression that articles on Enwiki should fairly be complete before going to the main space, I mean that’s how I’ve created my articles. Is there a specific time after which an article should be moved to draft if it still has issues? Thank you for the suggestion, though. – Erakilos (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, read more at WP:NPPHOUR. SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I just did. Thanks – Erakilos (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2026 (UTC)