User talk:Erictleung

Hi Erictleung! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:47, Monday, April 3, 2017 (UTC)

Hi Erictleung,

Welcome to the ISMB/ECCB Editathon! We hope you find this a useful session, let myself or Kierano know if you have any questions. Thank you again for your improvements to computational biology coverage on Wikipedia, and if you're not already a member of WikiProject Computational Biology we encourage you to sign up! Amkilpatrick (talk) 12:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

1. Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
2. We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
3. Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
4. The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
5. We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
6. More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
7. Citation details are important:
   • Be sure cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
   • Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
   • Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
   • Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
8. We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
9. Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!\
10. Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
11. Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Speed dating, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Frequency (marketing), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

‍ Relativity 02:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Relativity!

Erictleung (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

The Datasaurus dozen article that you just made is really cool! What a cool way to demonstrate data visualization. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your userpage says that you are in NYC. Consider saying hello at an in-person event planned at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC, such as the Prime Produce talks. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the cup of coffee! Much appreciated. I just found out about Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC earlier this year. I hope to be more regular :) Hope to see you there at an upcoming event. Erictleung (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opentrons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biohacker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Erictleung, you recently volunteered to review my proposal to recover some text about marketing mix optimization in the Marketing mix entry, thank you very much. In the Talk section, I have added a few comments to the discussion on this issue, as well as an alternative text I propose to add, which hopefully follows your observations. Could you give your opinion there as to whether I could add this new version of the text (or any modification of it)? Thanks again! EXPTIME-complete (talk) 11:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

None of the four items you recently added to List of lists of lists is a list of lists. Reverting. —Tamfang (talk) 22:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

@Tamfang Ah, I appreciate the note and reminder! Erictleung (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

You are a good sport! —Tamfang (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Data clean room. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

@CycloneYoris I respect the move! I'll take action accordingly once I've added more to it. Thanks! Erictleung (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Dating Sunday. Another editor, MolecularPilot, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Interesting article, thanks for writing it. Clear WP:GNG pass. :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MolecularPilot}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 06:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Just saw the change you made to factory model schools and I'm not sure why you made it. Your change doesn't match the content of the article and I don't see anything on the talk page explaining why. Could you say more about the change? EdHistory101 (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Which edit are you referring to? Are you referring to the short description change I made? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Factory_model_school&oldid=1280322676 Erictleung (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

I am! I see now that you added the short description - which is great! I didn't realize it was missing. The content, though, doesn't match the article's content. "term used by those advocating change to the American education system" works better. Can we change it to that? Thanks! EdHistory101 (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Ah, I'd agree with your assessment. I may have been too quick to summarize the article in the description. I'm also aiming to adhere to WP:SDLENGTH to be less than 40 characters. Although "term used by those advocating change to the American education system" is more accurate, short descriptions to be understandings are not intended to be definitions WP:SDNOTDEF (but if they are, that works).

I've updated the short description to hopefully compromise on accuracy and brevity. Erictleung (talk) 03:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Socket (cybersecurity), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Socket (cybersecurity) where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Green Tile Social Club. Another editor, Mrfoogles, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very well-cited article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mrfoogles}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mrfoogles (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Erictleung,

Thank you for creating Polars (software).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Article may not meet WP requirements for companies/products, namely WP:NCORP. The policy requires multiple INDEPENDENT sources that discuss the product in SOME DEPTH. The sources in this article include (a) the companies own website; (b) two blogs. The only source that may be sufficiently reliable (see WP:RS) is ""An Empirical Study on the Energy Usage ....", which is probably has authors that work for the company or on the product. Can someone demonstrate that that source is INDEPENDENT from the company?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Just a reminder, you have to register with UN security by Tuesday (today!) to attend the June 16 edit-a-thon. You also have to bring a government-issued ID with you. Pharos (talk) 19:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

@Pharos Just filled it out - thanks for the reminder! Erictleung (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Synthetic minority oversampling technique. Another editor, Zzz plant, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Topic defintiely looks notable- Chawla et al publication has almost 38k citations, and there's plenty of other highly-cited works too. My only feedback is that this may be a difficult article to follow for a person who's not already familiar with SMOTE. I'm not a stats person so take with a grain of salt but I would maybe suggesting moving the block of code down to the bottom and starting out with a longer summary/overview so it can be more easily understood by non-technical folks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zzz plant}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Zzz plant (talk) 02:06, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

@Zzz plant: thanks for reviewing and giving your feedback, I appreciate it. It's a work in progress, so I'll continue making it more accessible for the general reader who isn't familiar with the topic. I'll tag you and/or others once I've made some progress to make it less technical. Thanks! Erictleung (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Erictleung. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Identity graph, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ZADZADZ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZADZADZ (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Slowking Man (talk) 05:28, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Erictleung. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Socket (cybersecurity), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Chaos gardening. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 10:26, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Shina Novalinga when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)