User talk:ExcitedA

Please read WP:INVOLVED, editors cannot close a discussion in which they have been involved. I therefore reverted your close because of this. Please wait for an uninvolved editor to close it. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:09, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

I saw you place speedy deletion tags on a couple articles at Litehouse Foods and American Institute for Boys and Men. Please remember to notify page creators when you do so. I personally use Twinkle for things like that, so it all gets done in one step. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:20, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle for Dream Island, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: Special:Diff/1331026549. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello ExcitedA. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jihō Eigasha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A company that has produced notable works is a credible claim of importance. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello ExcitedA, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dustin Hendy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Articles with an infobox are not eligible for A3. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:03, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

I saw the following note by an editor removing your afd templat on that article. "JohnJ1995" states: "Undid revision 1331341544 by ExcitedA (talk) Original nominator's request" If JohnJ1995 was referring to you as the original nominator, could you nominate Keep in the afd with your reasons for reversing your earlier recommendation? It might save a lot of needless waste of time of WP editors. J JMesserly (talk) 05:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albanian–Chetnik War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian–Chetnik War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikicommonsfan134 (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello ExcitedA, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:User832489p124, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

You can delete it IDC about it User832489p124 (talk) 06:37, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

For articles like Draft:SN 1994H, WP:A11 doesn't apply, since the supernovae are well-documented real events and not created. While they can be discovered, it is highly unlikely that the article creator was the discoverer for all these articles they created and in any case a supernova is a credible claim of significance. A11 is for stuff like "I invented this word", "I started a company", "My friends and I discovered this cool fact", etc. It's not a catchall for low quality articles. The proper thing to do is to WP:DRAFTIFY. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 16:36, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

??? Aradicus77 (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

There seems to be no meaningful content, that is, I can't tell what the draft is about. - ExcitedA. It may be a good idea to look at this. 19:53, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Since when is deleting a draft a thing? It's a draft for a reason Aradicus77 (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. It's fine now. - ExcitedA. It may be a good idea to look at this. 19:55, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello ExcitedA, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hoveround, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not elegible for speedy deletion as the aricle was kept at its last AFD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:08, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

I (and others) have had decline many of your speedy deletions. If you are going to tag articles for speedy deletion, you must read and understand the speedy deletion criteria. It's okay to make mistakes, but you seem to make far too many. -- Whpq (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

I have read them long before you contacted me. - ExcitedA. It may be a good idea to look at this. 21:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello ExcitedA, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:The Field Guide To The Odyssey, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 19:26, 5 February 2026 (UTC)