User talk:FelineHerder

Hello, FelineHerder, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 09:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Burrobert (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:44, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Next papal conclave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:TOOSOON. No reason for creating this now. Title is also speculative and unhelpful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next papal conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next papal conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kaito-san (talk/contribs) 01:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Good idea for that navbox. I cant believe that wasnt a thing already. Metallurgist (talk) 19:13, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Can you add it to the Meir Kahane and Charlie Kirk assassination pages for me please? I'm not privileged enough to do it myself. -FelineHerder (talk) 22:02, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

haha yea would love to Metallurgist (talk) 03:57, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

@FelineHerder Do you put them on the assassination page and the bio or just the assassination page? I did both. Metallurgist (talk) 04:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Also, you can reply on my message on your talk page, so we dont have two separate threads. Ill move this over there. Metallurgist (talk) 04:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I think just the assassination page would suffice. --FelineHerder (talk) 07:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Well Ill leave it and someone can revert if they want. Metallurgist (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Category:People associated with Jeffrey Epstein has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:17, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Wikipedia:OLDMANDIES has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 8 § Wikipedia:OLDMANDIES until a consensus is reached. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 07:10, 8 April 2026 (UTC)