A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Growler, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growler, Arizona (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Secor, Iowa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Firsfron,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dixie, Iowa and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § Dixie, Iowa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. - Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

On 9 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Secor, Iowa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that workers had to somersault to safety when the Secor Bridge collapsed in 1911? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Secor, Iowa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Secor, Iowa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

DuMont Television Network has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I was wondering where you found the book cited as reference 2 in this page, as I am trying to do more research into this ghost town. I am currently trying to find all information about this atlas but am finding scarce little. Thanks for your time, apologies for dragging up your nearly two year old contribution to a stub article for my own curiosity. Acmonty (talk) 23:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omni Broadcasting Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omni Broadcasting Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 02:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

You may want to change "co-nominating" to "nominating" here. It seems to be causing a little confusion. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Arkana, Louisiana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

The article Cornerstone Television has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 01:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

The article Unity Broadcasting Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 17:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Invalid dinosaurs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

I think 14m and7.4 is a underestimate by pual serno CT scan, Spinosaurus skeleton is still 70%missing. and I had a dispute about this with other users on Wikipedia then they requested full protection for this page and I would like change the size because I have reliable sources for the larger size estimates. Cats12r2! (talk) 14:37, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

I think 14m and7.4 is a underestimate by pual serno CT scan, Spinosaurus skeleton is still 70%missing. and I had a dispute about this with other users on Wikipedia then they requested full protection for this page and I would like to change the size because I have reliable sources for the larger size estimates.

best regards cats12r2

Cats12r2! (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Iguanodontia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baynesville, Virginia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baynesville, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

You indef protected this on May 17. Did you mean to set an expiry date? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey can you provide protection log for Sachicasaurus? Someone is editing the weights without any proof. Whenever I change it back to the original weight (17 tonnes), people or someone is consistently changing the weight to 12 to 13 tonnes but don’t provide any proof. ExplorerKing (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

On 5 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baynesville, Virginia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was that an African-American was appointed postmaster of Baynesville, Virginia, in 1893 in preference to a former Confederate soldier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baynesville, Virginia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Baynesville, Virginia), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 03:56, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Television stations task force/TV Markets, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Television stations task force/TV Markets and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Television stations task force/TV Markets during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 19:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

you have deleted my article Cuisine of Antarctica using the G4 speedy deletion rule. The G4 rule could not be used in this case, since it applies only to identical copies of previously deleted articles and my version of the article was clearly different. Right before the deletion, I contested the speedy deletion in the talk page and it was contested there by one other user as well. I think the article should be recreated, mabye renamed to Food in Antarctica. Bedinek (talk) 09:08, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silverville, Indiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silver dollar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hamlet, North Dakota

added a link pointing to Great Northern Railway

Southam, North Dakota

added a link pointing to Soo Line

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Firsfron of Ronchester 14:09, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

At Travis County, Texas, during this edit, two refs were left incomplete. In both cases, the ref title had a {{!}}, and everything after the }} was removed. See this diff where I fixed it. If you used a script, I think that it may need some edits. Thanks. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 18:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Template:DuMont network shows has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Template:NTA Film Network shows has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Everest, North Dakota, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

WP:U7 requires that, among other things, the page was created more than 6 months ago and that it's a subpage rather than a basepage. Your deletion of User:Kirtipal singh chundawat was neither of those (I haven't checked to see if the original G15 claim was valid). * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

It didn't come anywhere close to meeting any of the four subcriteria of U7, either. Or, for that matter, any part of U7 except that its owner had few edits. Why the change from G15? That, it did qualify for. (Pppery: see the last paragraph.) —Cryptic 16:30, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Everest, North Dakota has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OmegaAOL -- OmegaAOL (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Firsfron. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

• When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
• All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
• A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
• As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
  • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
  • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

• Administrators may grant the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right to non-administrators who meet the criteria for granting. Importantly, an editor must make an explicit request for the permission (e.g. at WP:PERM/TAIV)—administrators are not permitted to assign the right without a request.
• Administrators will automatically be able to see temporary account IP information once they have accepted the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy via Special:Preferences or via the onboarding dialog which comes up after temporary accounts are deployed.

Impact for administrators

• It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
• It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
• Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

• Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
• Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
• See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

• It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Enable the user info card
  • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
• Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
• Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
• The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

• How to use Special:IPContributions
• How automatic IP reveal works
• How to use IP Info
• How to use User Info

Further information and discussion

• For more information and discussion regarding this change, please see the announcement from the Wikimedia Foundation at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF) § Temporary accounts rollout.

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Archaeoraptor has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Firsfron. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 21 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a wonderful, happy 2026 ahead. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:56, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Firsfron. Thank you for your work on Norman, North Dakota. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article! Your efforts and work were greatly appreciated! Have a blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 23:35, 3 January 2026 (UTC)