User talk:FlarpenX

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cinnabarinic acid (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Graeme Bartlett was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please rewrite the sections in prose (and not list points) using your own words that are based on the references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cinnabarinic acid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, FlarpenX! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cinnabarinic acid has been accepted

Cinnabarinic acid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:03, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi FlarpenX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! FeralOink (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Greetings, FlarpenX! Someone should have stopped by to welcome you by now. Sorry about that. We're usually not so many months behind schedule.

I'm also here because I want to commend you for your good work! Dialog is a fascinating and well-written, adequately-sourced new article that you created. You incorporated content sourced to my statistical hero-of-sorts, Professor Andrew Gelman at Columbia University! I also glanced at some of your other related, as well as entirely different, subject matter contributions. I'm glad you're here.

If you have any questions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page or send me an email through Wikipedia. That is a feature that some users choose to optionally enable. It won't reveal your identity or mine, so no worries about that.--FeralOink (talk) 08:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you very much for your kind words :)

Also happy to find a fellow Gelman's fan!

FlarpenX (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles