User talk:Fleets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nomination of Maxime Jobe for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxime Jobe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WARNING
Nomination of Robson Stevens for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robson Stevens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Robin Brochon for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Brochon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Mike Parenti for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Parenti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Maxime Stefani for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxime Stefani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Wallace Tangiiti for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallace Tangiiti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Mitch Cahalane for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitch Cahalane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Khalil Rahme for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalil Rahme until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Aidan Burrell for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidan Burrell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Harry Bardle for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Bardle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Shaun Squires for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Squires until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Owen Buckley for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Buckley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Eric Newbigging for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Newbigging until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Anton Iaria for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Iaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Sean Kenny (rugby league) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Kenny (rugby league) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Alex Mammone for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Mammone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Brad Moules for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Moules until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Rhys Lenarduzzi for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhys Lenarduzzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Proposed deletion of Oliver Gordon (rugby league)
The article Oliver Gordon (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Poorly sourced rugby BLP with no evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of independent coverage available online.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Sam Dunn (rugby league)
The article Sam Dunn (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Poorly sourced rugby BLP with no evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of independent coverage available online.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Wayne Chahoud
The article Wayne Chahoud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Poorly sourced rugby BLP with no evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of independent coverage available online.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Harvey Whiteley for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey Whiteley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Concern regarding Draft:Jack Coventry
Hello, Fleets. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack Coventry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Joel Wicks for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Wicks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Eze Harper for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eze Harper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of CJ Cortalano for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Cortalano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 Festival of World Cups
A tag has been placed on Category:2025 Festival of World Cups indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jensen Monk
Hello, Fleets. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jensen Monk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Rugbyleagueboxwomens
Template:Rugbyleagueboxwomens has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jack Coventry
Hello, Fleets. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jack Coventry".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:London Broncos current squad
Template:London Broncos current squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jensen Monk
Hello, Fleets. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jensen Monk".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2018 RFL Championship regular season table
Template:2018 RFL Championship regular season table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Jamie Humphreys for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Humphreys (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.CycloneYoris talk! 02:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Kelly (rugby league), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Keane Gilford for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keane Gilford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Shay Martyn for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shay Martyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Galvin
Hi! Can you show me where it says we should have separate paragraphs for previous and current clubs in the lede? Doctorhawkes (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi there. A what the player currently is in one sentence and what a player was in a wholly separate paragraph appears to be consistently applied for a number of years. It seems to make sense that we delineate between current and previous clubs, but some may see this a logical, and others not; some may see this as clean and others 180 degrees opposite. It does appears to be the standard, but if we want to move away from the norm, I'd happily be involved in any discussions. Fleets (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think it's a little rude to revert and say it's because of the MOS when the MOS does not say that. I'm going to revert in this case, because it seems to fit with MOS:LEADBIO, but I agree that first paragraph can get cluttered when listing a series of former clubs. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:58, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- I just went to the first page of Category:Australian_rugby_league_players and clicked on 15 players. Only 2 had separate paragraphs.Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- If you felt it was rude I do apologise, as that was not my intention. In fact it was one of the last used revision lines, and certainly not meant as a rebuke. No worries, and I appreciate your candour. I too had a look at other sportsmen and I found it to be largely a divide, but with other sports seeming to be very cluttered in the first sentence, or sentences. They broke up between current and previous, but this was just a random selection. It may also be that I was looking at well known sportsmen, who have played for more than two clubs, and Galvin has played a handful of games for the two clubs. He has played for the PMs XIII, and have added it ahead of the previous club contract.Fleets (talk) 14:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- All good. Thanks for the reply. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- If you felt it was rude I do apologise, as that was not my intention. In fact it was one of the last used revision lines, and certainly not meant as a rebuke. No worries, and I appreciate your candour. I too had a look at other sportsmen and I found it to be largely a divide, but with other sports seeming to be very cluttered in the first sentence, or sentences. They broke up between current and previous, but this was just a random selection. It may also be that I was looking at well known sportsmen, who have played for more than two clubs, and Galvin has played a handful of games for the two clubs. He has played for the PMs XIII, and have added it ahead of the previous club contract.Fleets (talk) 14:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
"Josh Maree" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Josh Maree has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 10 § Josh Maree until a consensus is reached. Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:46, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Anniversary Fleets 🎉
Hey @Fleets. Your wiki edit anniversary was 2 days ago, marking 10 years of dedicated contributions to this Wikimedia project. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. With over 77,659 edits, your dedication is an inspiration to the community. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 06:58, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
2025 London Broncos season moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 2025 London Broncos season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (talk) 04:41, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lucas Ribas
The article Lucas Ribas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails WP:SPORTCRIT
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Copy-Pasting
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Draft:2026 RFL Championship by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 2026 RFL Championship. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Same thing for Seth Nikotemo, which you WP:CUTPASTE back 1 January 2026. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Take a look between the edits and see there was a fair bit of additional research added this year.Fleets (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, and
while this is not an exact WP:CUTPASTE, the article closely paraphrases the draft. The last paragraph is exactly the same ("Nikotemo suffered a thumb injury..."), and many of the citation access dates match the draft's (pre-dating this article's creation). Authorship needs to be correctly attributed per Wikipedia's licensing, so the page history should be consolidated. Thank you
(bold not in my original histmerge request, which was granted). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:57, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, and
- Take a look between the edits and see there was a fair bit of additional research added this year.Fleets (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
December 2025
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of a page by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Tony Sukkar (rugby league). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. – bradv 22:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of James Delaney (rugby league) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Delaney (rugby league), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Delaney (rugby league) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Rosenthal
At least on my screen his image is squished and looks awful -- do you know how to fix this? Thanks, Opus33 (talk) 19:33, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
February 2026
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Tom Duffy (rugby league) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Setu Tu moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Setu Tu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 06:27, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 London Broncos season, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luke Smith was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
WPRL MOS
Thanks for letting me know about it with this edit summary here: . Could you also specify a link to the MOS please @Fleets? Thank you. Servite et contribuere (talk) 09:00, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- No worries, WPRL or please jump into any rugby league footballer article created any time, and you will see our Australian friends are very particular about cms and kgs, with secondary units of ft ins and st lbs across many, many thousands of player articles. If you wish to go up against those numbers, then please try and raise consensus for a change, but my feeling is that lbs would be a wholly alien weight measurement to Australia.Fleets (talk) 09:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)