User talk:Flognar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
see WP:REFB for help with formatting sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Flognar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Flognar/sandbox

Information icon Hello, Flognar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Flognar/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:08, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

"Ships" or "ships in class" headings in ship class articles

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war over whether a heading should read "ships", "construction" or "ships in class" Royal Navy warship class articles, according to the reverts you've made to Bellerophon-class battleship, Admiral-class battlecruiser, Courageous-class battlecruiser, Renown-class battlecruiser, Lion-class battlecruiser, Indefatigable-class battlecruiser, Queen Elizabeth-class battleship, Colossus-class battleship (1910), St Vincent-class battleship. And then you extended the edit-war by making to same edit to many other Royal Navy warship class articles. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:58, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

It's not an "edit war". I was trying to make a heading consistent across articles. When my changes got reverted I thought it was because I was not logged in the first time. So I made sure I was logged in and tried again. I did not know how my edits got reverted and thought maybe an automated process was removing everything I was doing. I was looking into why when you sent me this message. Flognar (talk) 16:11, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
This series of edits to Bellerophon-class battleship looks like an edit war to me:
Please note that there can be Wikilinks for other articles and talk pages to headings in articles (e.g. Bellerophon-class battleship#Ships), so unnecessary heading changes are deprecated. Heading changes can force a lot of maintenance work to repair such links.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:23, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scout-class cruiser (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Scout-class cruiser instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI