User talk:Frap

An article you recently created, Norweigan 4x4, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 23:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DoorLoop, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoorLoop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Frap,

Thank you for creating RISC-V ecosystem.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I think this would make a great deal more sense reorganised into a list article, which could then be linked from other RISC-V pages etc.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Smallangryplanet}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The article RISC-V ecosystem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This feels like a list of software that runs on risc-v, not an encyclopedia article. Considering it's orphaned, it doesn't even seem like a helpful one. Best to just get rid of it

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. mghackerlady (talk) (contribs) 15:14, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

I have attempted to make it not orphaned. The intention of the article is not to be a list of software, its suppose to cover the ecosystem — both software and hardware. It is not intended to cover every software (such as application software or cross-platform software that runs upon a virtual machine), it is supposed to cover low-level system software with explicit support for the RISC-V instruction set, such as compilers, interpreters and virtual machines. -- Frap (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2026 (UTC)