User talk:Gamji231

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Link

Hi there, I notice that a lot of your recent edits have been adding wikilinks en masse. Please keep in mind WP:OVERLINK and avoid linking common terms like responsible, as you did here. Let me know if you have any questions. Zeibgeist (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

In addition, some of the links you have added are totally wrong. Examples: Special:Diff/1301156016, Special:Diff/1301158212. Please stop. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey David, Thanks for the update. I would be very careful next time. Gamji231 (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

María Casares

added a link pointing to Cinema

Saint-Germain l'Auxerrois

added a link pointing to Saint-Germain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, I would take care next time Gamji231 (talk) 08:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Daniel Donche Jr., did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Apparently this is not the first time that you have added a link to a totally unrelated article. Why do you keep doing this? CodeTalker (talk) 13:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nafisat Abdullahi Aminu (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nafisat Abdullahi Aminu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 12:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Gamji231! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Carolina2k22 • (talk) 12:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Hi Gamji231! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the update @DrKay

I totally get it. Where do you think would be the best section to place the update?

However, I’ve cited reputable sources, so reverting it might be a bit redundant. Gamji231 (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

The update is already in the article body. The lead is a summary of the article and shouldn't repeat paragraphs from the main text. DrKay (talk) 06:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

I checked it! Thanks buddy Gamji231 (talk) 06:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Mthawelanga Mgudlwa (Anele Mdoda) Edit

Hi Gamji231! I have reverted your edit to the Mthawelanga Mgudlwa article, again (specifically under the Controversies section).

The main issue remains that the majority of criticism that she received from BDS supporters/pro-Palestinians remains uncited. The Citizen article that you added as a source also does not state that the backlash came from the two groups. As such, crediting the criticism to those two specific groups is not supported by a cited source, this is as per WP:V.

I have kept the same source, as well as the sourced facts that she referred to the land as "beautiful" and that she responded to criticism by calling it "political babble", in line with WP:BLPBALANCE.

If there are reliable sources that explicitly describe the critics as pro-Palestinian or BDS supporters, please point to the exact wording so it can be discussed. Otherwise, that attribution should not be included.

Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page, or reply here, if you'd like to discuss this further. beegskin • 🖂 • 🖉 09:43, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanner Evan Bergsma (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grapesurgeon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately the added sources aren't significant coverage from independent sources. I'm seeing one is a press release, which is influenced by Bergsma. What we need is basically independent news coverage that is more than just like a brief mention of his name.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tanner Evan Bergsma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

grapesurgeon (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, I'm Lp0 on fire. An edit that you recently made to Operation True Promise seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lp0 on fire () 17:42, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles