User talk:Gligan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Srbija

Lucovit treasure

Sorry, I thought the article seemed inappropriate. Upon closer inspection, it seems OK, but you should still add {{hangon}} instead of removing the CSD.

Good Article promotion

Congratulations!
Thanks for all the work you did in making Michael Shishman of Bulgaria a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. All the best, Quadell (talk)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Gligan! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Nomination of Battle of Monastir (1917) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Monastir (1917) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Monastir (1917) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Second Bulgarian Empire

Please, do not attempt to undo my work. If you want to edit something out, you can do so by making one-by-one changes. Also, make sure to state your reasons in the "edit reason" field. Thanks.

The World Destubathon

You are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. It's currently planned for June 16-July 13, partly due to me having hayfever during that period and not wanting to run it throughout July or August in the hotter summer and will be run then unless multiple editors object. There is currently $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. As 250 countries and entities is too much to patrol, entries will be by user, but there is $500 going into prizes for editors covering the most countries. Sign up if interested! ♦ Dr. Blofeld

Category:19th-century Bulgarian zoologists has been nominated for merging

Category:19th-century Bulgarian zoologists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 16:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Re:Spanish-Portuguese Wars

Thank you for your message and kind words. Neutrality is certainly a problem in wars regarding Spain, and I'm not surprised in the least about what you're telling me. However, I'm not specialized in all fields of Iberian history, and currently I doubt I could gather enough free time and sanity to carry the large scale discussion wars this topic will surely cause. If you can find more users specialized in Spanish history to tackle the issue, I will lend my votes. Baal Nautes (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Question

I noticed recently this move to one of your articles from Battle of Constantinople (922) to Siege of Constantinople (922) by the editor "Mustagaa ga192". From the quick reading of the article, it does not seem to me as a siege. Let me know whether it needs to be moved back to the original title. Happy editing. A.Cython(talk) 22:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

A.Cython, thank you very much for the notification. It was indeed a battle and not a siege, so I would be grateful, if you could move it back to the original title. Best regards, --Gligan (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for your speedy response. I moved it back. Happy editing! A.Cython(talk) 16:56, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI