User talk:GlowstoneUnknown
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 2026
I fixed the note to clarify it better for next time. Thanks. Happy editing! Altanner1991 (talk) 14:06, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
 |
The Editor's Barnstar |
| It's great to see someone helping maintain articles at Democratic Party (United States). Keep up the great work! Altanner1991 (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2026 (UTC) |
Results table
Hello. Re this creation of a results table, if not all the parties receiving votes are listed, you either need to use 'ivotes' (to prevent the percentages appearing) or add an 'Other parties' row with the total of the other parties. Otherwise the percentages (automatically calculated from the votes column) is going to be wrong. Also, all results tables need a source! Cheers, Number 57 00:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry about that, I had to leave my PC in the middle of creating the table, I probably should've <nowiki>'d it in the meantime. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 00:31, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Source review for Republican Party
I'm trying to do a source review for the Republican Party, but have no clue how. Here's what I found in the meantime. All describe the GOP as "far-right" as far as I can tell. I haven't found anything else besides original research to imply otherwise. Pippa Norris and V-DEM are the most convincing to me. For the moment: the article misrepresents sources calling it "authoritarian populist", "far-right", and describing demographic groups within it as "rignt-wing" to imply that the worke reject the notion the party is far-right. Jollyrime (talk) 17:32, 28 March 2026 (UTC)