User talk:Greedycell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Greedycell's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Edit warring
You do not seem to be a new user since you are leaving Twinkle notices on other users' talk pages and making productive edits. A reminder to be careful regarding the three-revert rule. Although it is likely sockpuppets that are making the same removals at It girl, the removals are not outright vandalism and the issue is considered a content dispute. Yue🌙 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
WeBuyAnyCar
Please respond to the comments on my talk page about the legitimate reductions made to the article. ~2026-44913 (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Perambra history section
hey, you recently reverted my changes in Perambra history section.The edits were done by me in good faith as the entire pov that i reverted was done by some anonymous accounts repeatedly in the previous year possibly by the same person.The citations given doesn't match the lead.The entire history section is filled with unsourced and dubious information which has no academic or historical backing and which promotes a specific pov.Any person with slight knowledge in keralan history can recognise this vandalism that's why I requested extended protection request to avoid another edit war.I humbly request you to please go through the history section of this page and check yourself. Malabar muse (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
WP:RFPP
A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Greedycell! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! R.COutlander07@talk 04:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello
OKAY, OKAY. Why did you do this on my talk page? I want to invite you to self revert yourself and restore the comment, and I am a WP:NOTHERE. I will REPORT YOU NEXT TIME AS A VOA. ~2026-51100-3 (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
- I removed a personal attack from your talk page. Greedycell (talk) 03:26, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 January 2026
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2025
Everybody had a hard year, everybody had a good time.
- News and notes: Good news... but also bad news for the Public Domain
Benvenuto Betty Boop, arrivederci Italian Photos.
- News from Diff: Solving puzzles together
Maryana Iskander says farewell.
- In the media: Every view on the 25th anniversary of everything
Media about hard-core nerds, a place with paragraphs, baby globes, and wikipedes.
- Comix: Perspectives
Everybody has one.
Greeting
Hello mate @Greedycell, I want to say thanks to you to help me to revert edits from an unidentified IP user, Yeah I know it's so annoying. But I want to thanks to you because you already help me to revert it, especially in motorcycle sport wikipedia. Btw, where are you from? Can we collab too? MotoFan9373 (talk) 07:59, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hello bro @Greedycell? MotoFan9373 (talk) 07:05, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
January 2026
Hi Greedycell! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Tommy Aldridge. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Tommy Aldridge, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. If you encounter an editor like EditingAldridge (talk · contribs) who is reverting it's better to take the discussion somewhere that others can get involved rather than get drawn into an edit war. WP:UAA for the username issue, or WP:AN3 for the 3RR, or WP:COIN for the conflict of interest... As the proverb says, there's more than one way to skin a cat. Cabayi (talk) 12:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
My edit which you reverted
Hello!
You recently reverted my edit (as per your note on my talk page) for not citing sources as per BLP. However, my edit merely expanded the lede by mostly copy-pasting bits of info from the body of the article. No new information was added.
As per my understanding of Wiki's citation policy, information in the lede which is merely summarizing adequately sourced information from the body of the article is not required to replicate the citations in the lede section.
If my understanding on this is incorrect and you're not a bot, then surely the appropriate response would be to ask me to copy-paste the citations into the lede also, or do that yourself, rather than delete the edit? ~2026-76346-2 (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Having just looked at your user page, it seems you're running a bunch of counter-vandalism scripts? So I can understanding why this has been flagged, AFAIK incorrectly but please correct me w/ a message if I'm wrong on this.
- Thanks! ~2026-76346-2 (talk) 01:31, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Even if the information was sourced, per WP:LEAD it is undue to be included in the lede. Greedycell (talk) 01:37, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Information about BreachForums
Hi Greedycell,
I just saw that you keep editing .cz domain to .jp.
If you didn't know, .jp is a skidded domain who isn't the real BF.
Source:
https://breachforums.cz/index.php?threads/backend-ip-ports-infrastructure-of-bf-jp.295/
Many thanks,
John ~2026-77731-6 (talk) 23:12, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
My Edit Reverted by You
Greetings,
You reverted my edit to the birth name of Paris (rapper). His whole name is listed on his two album pages on the site. That's what I was going off of when I made the edit. ~2026-82557-5 (talk) 06:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Category:Cuphead
Hello Greedycell. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:Cuphead, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: @Not1Soul, Greedycell, Marcocapelle, and Liz.: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_22#Category:Cuphead was in 2022 This would appear to fall under the 2023 now deprecated WP:SMALLCAT . I'm putting this in an edit summary, which I think works Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC). Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 February 2026
- In the media: Global powers see Wikipedia as fundamental target for manipulation
Attempted Wikipedia shenanigans apparent from Epstein, AI, various governments.
- News and notes: Discussions open for the next WMF Annual Plan
Plus, WikiFlix going places, steady progress on older FAs and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- Serendipity: Maintenance crews continue to slog through Wikipedia's oldest Featured Articles
Hundreds of old FAs have been triaged since project began, but thousands remain — and they need reviewers.
- Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
- Technology report: Wikidata Graph Split and how we address major challenges
A personal perspective on a major update to the Wikimedia social machine.
- Traffic report: Deaths, killings, films, and the Olympics
I'll have the usual!
- Opinion: Incoming Incurables
A poem for Wikipedia Day 2026.
- Crossword: Pop quiz
Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?
- Comix: herculean
efforts.
The Signpost: 10 March 2026
- Interview: Bernadette Meehan, new Wikimedia Foundation CEO
Part 2.
- News and notes: Security testing unleashes computer worm on Meta-wiki
Dormant worm awakes; a sketchy archiving site struck; ether burns.
- Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?
- In the media: Indonesian government blocks Wikimedia logins; archive site scoured from Wikipedia after owner runs malware
As well as controversy over LLM translations.
- Recent research: To wiki, perchance to groki
Comparisons continue.
- Obituary: Madhav Gadgil, Fredrick Brennan, Mark Miller, Chip Berlet
Rest in peace.
- Opinion: Interface administrators and trusting trust
Potential attacks are the logical consequence of giving a group of users unlimited control over JavaScript.
- Technology report: English Wikipedia deprecates archive.today after DDoS against blog, altered content
After the archive site launched a DDoS campaign against a small blog in January 2026, a request for comment was started, with consensus to deprecate the site used almost 700 thousand times.
- Op-ed: Why is "Trypsin-sensitive photosynthetic activities in chloroplast membranes" cited in "List of tallest buildings in Chicago"?
The answer is slop.
- Essay: The pursuit of a button click
Volunteering for Wikipedia has its rewards. The thank-button, for example.
- In focus: Short descriptions: One year later
A discussion of the challenge set forth to the Wikipedia community one year ago!
- WikiProject report: Unreferenced articles backlog drive
Unreferenced articles in English Wikipedia - help us in the backlog drive!
- Community view: Speaking of planning ...
The WMF planning process is underway.
- Traffic report: Over the mountain, kissing silver inlaid clouds
Death and the Winter Olympics.
- Crossword: "It will never happen"
Want to take a break?
- Comix: BRIEn't
Or is it.