User talk:HarryPotter2011

Hello, HarryPotter2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eagles–Packers rivalry, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagles–Packers rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ClaudineChionh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2003 NFC Wild Card playoff game (Seattle–Green Bay)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 01:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Your editing is getting disruptive. The AFD on the Eagles rivalry will run its course and then we can go from there. Also, please don't move draft pages into the mainspace that aren't complete, especially when those drafts are written exclusively by one person. It is disruptive and considered extremely poor taste. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to do anything wrong, I was just creating pages. HarryPotter2011 (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Here is a breakdown of my predictions of Week 14 of the Green Bay Packers schedule 2601:247:C983:C0:D4BB:354A:E3FC:51BC (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

• Also, here's my other predictions of the rest of the schedule:

Note: Weeks 10 and 15 swap networks in case of cross–flexing.

Hi HarryPotter2011, regarding the above prediction, is this posted by you, but when you happened to be signed out of your account? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:04, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Ah, yes. Me and a friend were just chatting with each other, so no need to worry about these, as these are just predictions for the upcoming NFL season. HarryPotter2011 (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Here are some of my predictions of next NFL playoffs:

* Indicates overtime victory
** Indicates 2OT victory.

Let's hear your predictions of next year's NFL playoffs! 2601:247:C983:C0:D4BB:354A:E3FC:51BC (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Next step is your account gets blocked. Please stop adding content about an "eagles/packers rivalry". Eagles–Packers rivalry was deleted. Please find something else to focus on. Also, I will say that what I have seen appears to either be true socking, mistakenly editing while signed out, or at the very least working with other real world people to push a certain POV. All of these run counter to WP:SOCK will also lead to a block. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 01:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, HarryPotter2011. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chargers–Rams rivalry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, HarryPotter2011. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chargers–Rams rivalry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:32, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2025 Detroit Lions season

added a link pointing to David Montgomery

2025 Green Bay Packers season

added a link pointing to David Montgomery

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Green Bay Packers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Kemp.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League § Windy City Miracle. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 18:08, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Windy City Miracle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windy City Miracle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Assadzadeh (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Windy City Miracle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ShallowC (talk) 09:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 2025 Green Bay Packers season shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Onorem (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I did not start this edit war. It was this guy: ~2025-42534-65. He keeps removing the fact that the Packers were favored in Week 15 against the Broncos. I keep telling him to go to this website: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202512140den.htm but all he just does is remove it. I sure hope somebody blocks him for this. HarryPotter2011 (talk) 20:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

It doesn't matter who "started it." You are both edit warring. As I told you about a week ago on my talk page, "It's a simple content dispute, not vandalism. Even if the information was accurate, nothing says that it has to be included in the game summary. Try steps in dispute resolution." You didn't do that. Instead you continued to edit war. You've now both been reported. --Onorem (talk) 20:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HarryPotter2011 reported by User:Onorem (Result: ). Thank you. Onorem (talk) 20:20, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

HarryPotter2011,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 06:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 06:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

You have a history of edit warring. NFL rivalry pages are protected because of long-running disruptive editing regarding colors. Changes need to be discussed first. Any addition edit warring and you will be blocked. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The fact that Bad Bunny headlined the halftime show is much more significant than a Starbucks promo, but you don't see that in the Seahawks article either. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:22, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:47, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

What is your connection to GreenBay2011? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:47, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

None HarryPotter2011 (talk) 00:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

So I guess it means I'm blocked forever, right? HarryPotter2011 (talk) 15:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Until you start telling the truth, yes. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 15:18, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Alright. I'll tell you the truth. GreenBay2011 is my alt account. HarryPotter2011 (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarryPotter2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I didn't do anything wrong and I do not know anybody by the name of GreenBay2011. HarryPotter2011 (talk) 04:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Based on your interaction and the technical evidence, that is not credible. Cabayi (talk) 09:45, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.