User talk:Hawkeye7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quick facts

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · 2026
Close
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

GA award Charles Thau

Re: Queue 4

You just deleted the queue; as the reviewer, I don't think you're supposed to mess around with it. Also, the secondary source says "Van Vleck credits her with key work on the quantum mechanics of magnetism", which was early work. I have no objection to restoring the thesis part, but my information was correct and it's best to notify me. Viriditas (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

You're right; I should not have edited it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
That's okay. I've made the same mistake before. Now, how do you want to word it? Viriditas (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
The issue I have is that the hook and the article are now out of step. The wording of the article, hook, and source should all agree with each other. (WP:DYKHOOKCITE) The Conversation source (fn 1) says "Frank’s thesis, partially published in Physical Review in 1932, focused on the element samarium. It showed quantum mechanical corrections were needed to explain the experimental data and contains a plot that appears in Van Vleck’s Nobel lecture (fn 6), labelled 'V.V. & F'." The Nobel Prize speech does not cite Frank's thesis but a 1929 paper, Van Vleck, J. H.; Frank, A. (1 December 1929). "The Effect of Second Order Zeeman Terms on Magnetic Susceptibilities in the Rare Earth and Iron Groups". Physical Review. 34: 1494–1496. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.1494.. I know from personal experience that supervisors often publish material from their graduate students under their own name, but at least van Vleck read it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:10, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
I’m confused. I added back in the wording you wanted. Are you saying it should be removed again? Viriditas (talk) 05:10, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
No, it now matches the article. The use of "cited" is a bit colloquial here but I think it is okay. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:42, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
What would you change it to ("cited") if you had a preference? Viriditas (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
I am not sure. I am not good at finding better words. Referenced? Included research from? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Savannah River Plant article

This sentence in the article appears to contain an error: "The commissioners learned that DuPont was recommending the acquisition of 240,000 acres (97,000 ha) instead of 2,160,000 acres (870,000 ha)." The source: Reed, et al 2002, at page 144 states: "The engineering manpower was needed as the AEC learned that Du Pont was recommending the acquisition of 240,000 acres rather than the 160,000 first projected." The 240,000 acres as the larger number is consistent with the next sentence of the article; "The additional land provided river frontage as a natural boundary, secure access to the water supply, and provide flexibility in the location of pumping stations." Other than that, B class headed up. Donner60 (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Typo. Corrected. Thanks for that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:13, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-08

MediaWiki message delivery 19:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Help, please

I want to be sure you're seeing , and I really hope you can help keep this from ending in tears. You of all people know how much respect men such as Uwikis deserve, and I don't want to see him hurt. EEng 13:27, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Relief of Douglas MacArthur scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Relief of Douglas MacArthur has been scheduled as today's featured article for 11 April 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 2026, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 2026. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 21:52, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Request to review Bella Ramsey FAC nomination

Hi @Hawkeye7. Apologies for contacting you out of the blue but I was wondering whether you be willing to take a look at my featured article nomination for Bella Ramsey's page? I noticed you’ve recently reviewed Robert Pattison’s FAC, and I’d really value any feedback or suggestions you had. Thanks! Crp74 (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 238, February 2026

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 March newsletter

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-10

MediaWiki message delivery 17:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

More information The Downlink ...
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 31 January
Close
More information Volume 4 — Issue 1, Spaceflight articles by quality and importance ...
Volume 4 Issue 1
Spaceflight Project  Project discussion  Members  Assessment  Open tasks  Popular pages  The Downlink
In the News
  • NASA called off a planned spacewalk of SpaceX Crew-11 on 8 January, and later cancelled the mission outright, after one of the crewmembers, Mike Fincke, was reported to have a medical complication. This was the first time that this occurred in US history.
  • On 11 January, the Pandora spacecraft was successfully launched. Pandora is designed to study the atmospheres of transiting exoplanets, with the intention of identifying targets for future observation.
Article of the month

Exoplanetary Circumstellar Environments and Disk Explorer (EXCEDE) is a proposed space telescope for NASA's Explorer program to observe circumstellar protoplanetary and debris discs and study planet formation around nearby (within 100 parsecs) stars of spectral classes M to B. Had it been selected for development, it was proposed to launch in 2019.

The spacecraft concept proposed to use a 70 centimeter diameter telescope-mounted coronagraph called PIAA (Phase Induced Amplitude Apodized Coronagraph) to suppress starlight in order to be able to detect fainter radiation of circumstellar dust. Characterizing constitution of such disks would provide clues for planetary formation (mostly in habitable zones), while already existing exoplanets can be detected through their interaction with dust disk. The project's Principal Investigator is Glenn Schneider.

Image of the month
Wernher von Braun with the Rocketdyne F-1 engines

Pictured here are two titans of spaceflight history: Dr. Wernher von Braun, one of the main figures of the early American space program and designer of both the Saturn V and V-2 rockets, and five (four visible) Rocketdyne F-1 engines, used on the Saturn V Dynamic Test Vehicle. Dr. von Braun's career is noted for a great number of achievements in human spaceflight, including the Apollo mission which successfully put human beings on the moon; nevertheless, it is burdened with the shadow of his activities in the Nazi Party, especially concerning his work on the V-2.

The engines behind him, in addition to being immense, have the honor of being the only engines used to get humans to the moon, as of the time of writing. Developed in the late 1950s, the 8,400 kilograms (18,500 lb) engines are still the most powerful single combustion chamber liquid-propellant rocket ever made.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 219. Total number of members: 446.

January Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a complete list here.


  1. United StatesCanadaUnited KingdomFinlandGermany Falcon 9 Block 5various, including Pandora (11 Jan. at 13:44:50) (success)
  2. IndiaThailandSpain PSLV-DLvarious, including EOS-N1 and THEOS-2A (12 Jan. at 04:48:30) (launch failure)
  3. China Ceres-2various (17 Jan. at 04:05) (launch failure)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 January 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since December 2025, there are two fewer top-importance, two more high-importance, two more mid-importance, 19 more low-importance, 20 more NA-importance, and 31 more unknown-importance articles, for a total of 72 new articles. There are also three more GA-class, three more B-class, twelve more C-class, eleven more Start-class, and eleven more Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

Close

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

DYK for John David Rogers

On 4 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John David Rogers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John David Rogers represented Australia at the Japanese surrender in Singapore in September 1945 (video featured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John David Rogers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John David Rogers), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZetaC 00:02, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This is a really interesting article. I've never given much consideration to the Australian Army's intelligence services during World War II, and I learned a lot from reading it. Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Page move during FAC

Hi Hawkeye, I've just promoted Shipping discourse and subsequently realised it was moved to Shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction during the FAC. Pls remind me, for the benefit of FACBot, would it be simpler to move the article page back to its original name (which it is in the FAC archive page), let FACBot do its thing, and then re-do the article page move? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:14, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

It should be okay. I will watch it and ensure that it gets processed properly. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:16, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks mate, I'll just proceed with the regular promotion steps then -- but should I use the new name to add to the Featured Log and the FAs page, and just leave the FAC archive page name as is? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes, use the new name. So long as redirects are in place, the Bot should be able to follow. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:31, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
It all worked fine. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:15, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Great, tks. So it looks like now it's not an issue if an article page name is altered during the life of the FAC, we just keep the original name for the FAC archive page and add the article under its new name to the FA page... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Special Engineer Detachment

On 6 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Special Engineer Detachment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John D. Hoffman of the Special Engineer Detachment was awarded the Soldier's Medal, the US Army's highest non-combat decoration and the only one given to a member of the Manhattan District? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Special Engineer Detachment. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Special Engineer Detachment), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZetaC 12:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-11

MediaWiki message delivery 18:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Hugh Mackenzie (Royal Navy officer), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A directly relevant quote from MOS:POSTNOM: "The lead sentence should be concise: Academic (including honorary) degrees and professional qualifications may be mentioned in the article, along with the above, but should be omitted from the lead." Qwerty123M (talk) 02:28, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

This Month in GLAM: February 2026





Headlines
Read this edition in full Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2026-12

MediaWiki message delivery 19:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Military logistics is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Military logistics is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 239, March 2026

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

DYK for James Stanley Rogers

On 20 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Stanley Rogers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that James Stanley Rogers was the secretary of a panel that oversaw the production of optical munitions in Australia during the Second World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Stanley Rogers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, James Stanley Rogers), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

  Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:45, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of 2020s American renouncement of allies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020s American renouncement of allies, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020s American renouncement of allies until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion. SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 04:02, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Your nomination of Military logistics is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Military logistics has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 08:03, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Military logistics has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Military logistics has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 02:33, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI