User talk:TheGreatEditor024

Hello TheGreatEditor024! Your additions to Elmech EM 992 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I really didn't know that Designs topic would create an issue. Thank you for removing it TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article India at the Deaflympics has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate the help you provided, even if I don’t remember where u came from - but please don’t change the structure I have it as, such as moving the infobox template and capitalizing the headings. I understand why u did and I’m not trying to be mean or assume bad faith. this is also against WP:NOBAN. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 23:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Well I came from Wikipedia Help desk. You said "i have a problem with {{userboxside}}" and also added "feel free to edit the page". So, I edited the page.

I am sorry if I messed up. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 01:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I capitalized the heading because it felt a bit weird. I didn't know that it was on purpose. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I guess I tried to improve the wrong infobox. No wonder, you got confused. I did mess up. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

oh. i linked which page i wanted help with, but maybe u didn’t see that. maybe i should’ve put it in the comment itself rather than the title.

thats on me as well a bit, since im autistic. that may make me say or put things in an unconventional way. i was making sure u knew the guidelines, but it appears it was just a misunderstanding. that’s goofy.

no bad blood at all! 😁 — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 05:45, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Nope, It's my fault. I didn't see the link. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I’m not the best person to help with this specific userbox. Also, just a note that some of the wording on your page may come across as offensive to others, so you might want to review it in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines on user pages. Another editor at the Help Desk should be able to assist further. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

no, no you didn’t mess up! i wouldn’t put it like that.

which sentence(s) makes u feel that way? — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 05:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your references. You wrote

1. Christianity is the biggest religion in the world, with over 2B adherents. alongside Islam, they both make up of the entire world’s stupidity."

(You should know that this statement hurts almost billions of people)

Btw are you anti-communist or anti-capitalist. you wrote both lol TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

well, that’s what i believe but i hid it.

im both anti-communist and anti-capitalist. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

I would advice that it would be great if you removed Anti-Islam, Anti-Christian and Anti-Judaism from your infobox :religious views. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

@Tonkarooson I'm inclined to agree here (I spotted this discussion when I happened to pop in to TGE's talk page.) Wikipedia is not a soapbox for anybody's political or religious ideologies; and we're all really better off if we don't talk about such things at all. There is no need for any of us to know where you stand on such issues. We're all here to build an encyclopedia, which by its very nature requires we leave our ideologies and biases at the door (as much as such a thing is possible). It's an "I [won't] show you mine if you [won't] show me yours" sort of thing. (This obviously doesn't apply to your statement of support for queer rights; human rights aren't, or rather shouldn't be, a political issue.) Athanelar (talk) 17:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

ok that’s fine. there’s also WP:UPYES. is the stuff on my main userspace fine?

i want to keep it but i’ll hide it. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

More relevant is WP:UPNOT which says there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely... to give widespread offense which stating that something like 4 billion people "make up the entire world's stupidity" certainly is (even if, as I have a hunch is the case, Wikipedia's editor-base generally trends toward atheism)

I would also say you're leaning a bit towards excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia per WP:USERBIO. I'm not going to unilaterally tell you you should trim any of it, but I would just like to gently point you in the direction of WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA; user pages... should be used primarily to present information relevant to work on the encyclopedia. Limited autobiographical information is allowed, but user pages do not serve as personal webpages,

Like a lot of younger queer editors I've seen around, you seem to be mostly using your userpage like you would use a Carrd link in your twitter bio. This is appropriate to some extent (we definitely need to know your preferred pronouns so we can interact with you respectfully, of course) but things like your eye colour and a list of philosophies you subscribe to are leaning toward being out of scope. There's nothing specific I could tell you to remove in order to fix it, because it's more of an evident philosophical approach to the way you're approaching the concept of a userpage. Athanelar (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

yes, of course. I apologize for this. I’ll work on it now. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 22:45, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

wait. lemme just make sure here. which should i exactly get rid of? i think it’ll be the religious part, right? — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 22:47, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Like I said, There's nothing specific I could tell you to remove in order to fix it, because it's more of an evident philosophical approach to the way you're approaching the concept of a userpage. I don't think it's as simple as 'remove X and Y and it'll be better,' that's why I just wanted to give you some general pointers as to what the purpose of a userpage here is supposed to be. Athanelar (talk) 23:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

i read the project page before.

👍 — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 01:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

first of all, i’m not trying to offend anyone - attack the argument, not the person.

i didnt exactly think wp:soap applied there but i guess it does. i kept it so i can put it somewhere else. until then, i’ll fully remove it. i’d rather not make it a big deal. i messed up, i apologize for that, i just wanted to share my opinions. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:17, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Please don't announce to users that they've been reported to WP:SPI. There's no need for them to know. If the check comes out positive, then they get blocked as a sock and that's done; if the check comes out negative, then they never know they were under suspicion. In the best case scenario where the user is innocent, then you'll distress them by implying they're in some kind of trouble. If the user is guilty, then you might let them know someone is 'on their scent' and prompt them to abandon the account and try evading their block with other accounts (which a checkuser should be able to check anyway, but in any case there's no reason to tip them off.)

There is a reason why SPI does not mandate that we inform people they've been reported, unlike ANI. There's generally no need, nor nothing to be gained, from users 'responding' on their SPI. Athanelar (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry, I was just trying to help, but I shouldn’t have said that directly. I'll handle it properly next time TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, I totally understand, I just wanted to make you aware for the future! You might want to read the relevant essays WP:BEANS and WP:DENY, which are both about limiting the kinds of information or interaction we have with [potentially] problematic editors. Athanelar (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, I am new to discussions other than WP:Teahouse, So i kinda messed up. btw, I'll make sure that I'll read the links you posted. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pala, Kerala, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

... welcome to WP:QAI and thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the talk page for more information. If these are addressed within seven days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 06:44, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Dragonhawk12 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}.

Congrats to getting Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area to Good Article status! I know from your wikipage that you like lions, so this is the closest template I've got. Keep up the good work! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 17:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @Pppery TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 06:03, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

I have corrected the mistakes TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)