User talk:IQual

Ahoj, vsimol som si ze si davnejsie vytvoril stranku MFK Dukla Banská Bystrica, nemohlo by sa pokracovat v povodnej stranke, s tym ze by sa tam doplnila fuzia s Kremnickou a premenovanie na MFK Dukla^[1]? Pride mi to ako logicke pokracovanie povodneho klubu s mierne uprevenym nazvom a podobnym logom^[2]. Co si o tom myslis?

(Svk fan) 23:10, 2 May 2018 (CET)

Cau, tak ono to je zlozitejsie s tymi nasimi klubami, tusim dukla mala velke dlhy, preto uz nemohla pokracovat... kremnicka sa preto obetovala aby sa zachranila znama znacka, urcite to dava logiku ze je to pokracovatel dukly bb... chcelo by to nejake vyjadrenie od kompetetnych z klubu ako to vlastne s duklou je... ci je to uplne novy klub ci pokracovatel dukly pomocou licencie kremnicky...a asi by sme mali diskusiu preniest do SVK casti wiki nakolko tato je ENGLISH :) (IQual) 03:06, 3 June 2018 (CET)

Ak vies kde tak to tam kludne otvor, ja na tu Slovensku az tak velmi nechodim :) (Svk fan) 22:02, 3 June 2018 (CET)

Podla tohto clanku to vyzera ze kluby sa spojili, takze by som to videl ako pokracovanie znacky Dukla.^[1] (Svk fan) 15:07, 6 June 2018 (CET)

cau (Svk fan), -tak asi to tak bude, je to podobny pripad ako ked FC Licartovce zachranili vtedajsie MFK Kosice...takze skusim to prepojit opat na dukla s tym ze nazov sa zmeni a v historii uvediem zlucenie dvoch klubov pod znackou MFK Dukla BB. Do celoštátnej súťaže sa vďaka Dukle vracia slávna značka. Neobávate sa negatívnych reakcií, vzhľadom na to, že Banskú Bystricu zachránilo jedine spojenie s Kremničkou? „Kremnička bola prakticky farmou Dukly, pôsobí tú gro hráčov i trénerov z Banskej Bystrice. Je dôležité, že sa zachovala značka, pretože keby sa to tu rozpadlo, neviem, ako by to dopadlo s futbalom v Banskej Bystrici. Takto môžeme v horizonte niekoľkých rokov uvažovať aj nad návratom medzi elitu.“ (IQual) 17:30, 6 June 2018 (CET)

Uz som to prehodil (okrem nazvu), bude treba to nove MFK zmazat aby sa dal stary FK premenovat (Svk fan) 13:07, 15 June 2018 (CET)

The article Niaré Benogo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV found.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. C679 09:04, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

The article František Brezničan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lower-league former footballer who fails WP:GNG.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. C679 20:51, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

The article Adam Mihálik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who fails WP:GNG.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. C679 04:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Druzstevnik Velky Hores.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

The article Lukáš Hlavatovič has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SIGCOV

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Fcstmani (talk) 12:43, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

The article Lukáš Švrček has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can’t find any evidence of WP:SIGCOV

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Fcstmani (talk) 12:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)