User talk:Ifly6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For all your contributions relating to the topic of Rome, commendable for both their quality and quantity. Avilich (talk) 22:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! Ifly6 (talk) 00:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
That was quick, congrats on the GA for Catilinarian consp. Avilich (talk) 03:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! Ifly6 (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
For bringing Catilinarian conspiracy to GA, at long-last. Great work! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Here is the award you deserve for doing the most detailed GAN review by a new reviewer in the last month, in my view, at Talk:Battle of New Carthage/GA1. (t · c) buidhe 22:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Scholarly Barnstar

Scholarly Barnstar
Thanks for your work on Marian reforms! Also, congratulations on another GA! Iseult Δx parlez moi 15:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

The Socratic Barnstar
For your own combating problematic material on Carus' Sasanian campaign! — ImaginesTigers (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! Ifly6 (talk) 14:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of oldest universities in continuous operation on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 14:30, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Excessive citations inline tag at Munatia gens

Saw this edit this evening and had a look. There are indeed a lot of citations for Lucius Munatius Plancus, mainly because he's mentioned in a lot of different sources. But the tag text says (when you hover over it): "this claim has too many footnotes for reading to be smooth". That's the basic rationale for this tag, but it's probably not the case here, because each entry in the list is on a separate line (though the detailed ones do wrap once or twice). This concern seems less significant when the citations don't interrupt the flow of text in a paragraph.

I considered trying to bundle the citations, either manually or using a bundling template. But which ones would go together? Caesar, Cicero, and Plutarch? Prosopographia Imperii Romani and Magistrates of the Roman Republic? That doesn't seem to make sense. I suppose I could bundle them all into one giant reference, but I'm not sure that would be any more helpful to readers, and it would be inconsistent with the format used elsewhere, which is usually one reference per author (with multiple works of an author already combined into a single reference).

I didn't want to do an exhaustive study of each source or try to prune out what seem to me to be the least important ones, like Velleius Paterculus (since most of the history will be covered in more detail by others) or Horace (cited for a literary appearance). Though if that's the only logical way to do it, then that may be the result. I'd probably make sure they're all cited in Plancus' own article, where they could be separated by relevance to different things; in gens articles, I've always grouped all references at the end of each entry—in part to maximize readability, which of course is the issue here. But before I go to that level of trouble, how important is the number of citations really, when each entry is a separate line to begin with? P Aculeius (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:North Africa on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 23:34, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Volkskammer on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 18:31, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles March 2026 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | March 2026 Backlog Drive

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
  • Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:MAR26]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:13, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI