User talk:ImVeryStupid

Hi ImVeryStupid! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 20:19, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. --JBL (talk) 00:57, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 20:29, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Sorry. ImVeryStupid (talk) 21:53, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Fort Lauderdale–Sarasota shootings, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Fort Lauderdale–Sarasota shootings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello ImVeryStupid! Your additions to Killing of Ken Lee have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at KMVQ-FM, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 21:31, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at KMVQ-FM, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 03:28, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Annunciation Catholic Church shooting, a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please review WP:BLPCRIME. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I broke so many fourth walls on Wikipedia. I would rather have my account banned than active. ImVeryStupid (talk) 03:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Why? Chattenoir (talk) 03:18, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't care. Besides, Doug Weller banned me for good, so I wanna thank him. ImVeryStupid (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Self request, see their talk page and posts to Mikewem.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 10:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much. ImVeryStupid (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Why on earth did you block him for no reason? He did nothing wrong. ~2026-11772-98 (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

? Do you not see him asking to be blocked? That's why Doug Weller did it. Bishonen | tålk 13:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC).

Doug, I know I'm proud that you terminated my account, but I just wanted to say that I'm very sorry. I'm not upset at you; I'm just upset at myself. I just don't know how to follow the rules properly at Wikipedia, and I'm very new to Wikipedia. The reason why I wanted to be banned is because I don't know how to follow the Wikipedia rules although I kept reading it over a hundred times, and as well as me really hating myself.

If you unblock my account, I'm probably not going to go on Wikipedia as much, but I think retaining my ban is a good option. All I want is help. Just please help me. Thank you very much Doug, and I hope I'll be better soon. ImVeryStupid (talk) 21:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hating yourself isn't a solution to this problem. (And I'm saying that as someone who's expressed a lot of self-hate.) I'd suggest reading Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot, as well as some of the material on editing contentious topics. I think you decided to jump into the deep end of the pool when you started on Wikipedia, and it's easy to get into arguments with people when they're editing articles about contentious topics. I suggest you sit back, catch your breath, and relax. Wikipedia is not a battleground. You aren't banned, your account wasn't terminated, and you can always submit an unblock request. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 04:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ImVeryStupid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I'm very sorry for hating myself. I know everybody thinks that I didn't do wrong, I just need a termination break from my Wikipedia account. I'm not upset at anybody; I'm just upset at myself. I just don't know how to follow the rules properly at Wikipedia although I already read the rules like thousands of times, and I'm very new to Wikipedia. I just hate myself big time and I want somebody to help. ImVeryStupid (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't seem to be asking to be unblocked. We cannot give you medical or psychological advice; please consult with a qualified professional who can help you. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.