User talk:Ivanhardybirt

Hello, Ivanhardybirt, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am your mentor and you can ask me any questions on my talk page or check out our help pages if you need help. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Play the The Wikipedia Adventure
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• Remember to cite reliable sources
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome! ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 11:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Ivanhardybirt! I noticed your contributions to Sam Denby and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 02:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Lake Louise (Manitoba). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Suntoloo Panoom (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to The Diana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 14 novembre (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to North Marysburgh Township, Ontario. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Killarnee (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkimaria (talk • contribs) 05:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi there and welcome to Wikipedia. Please check before adding categories to articles that the article is not already a member of a subcategory of that category. For example, the article for Dove Holes was already in Category:Chapel-en-le-Frith, which is a subcategory of Category:High Peak, Derbyshire. By Wikipedia convention, and to avoid duplication, only the "lowest" appropriate category in the hierarchy is used, so adding Dove Holes to the High Peak category was incorrect (I've reverted it). See WP:CAT#TREE. Dave.Dunford (talk) 13:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

The article Johnny in the Middle of the Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The page Johnny in the Middle of the Park was created specifically for explaining the lostwave. It is not notable enough to be on Wikipedia and it only as primary sources and not secondary reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Read Wikipedia:No original research for more information.

Category:Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I saw you made an edit to La Domenica Sportiva article. You did not state a source of where you got the information of that particular song being played in an episode of the TV program. This edit can be located here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Domenica_Sportiva&diff=prev&oldid=1232024579. Therefore, I have reverted it. If you have an actual credible and reliable source that states that this song was played in an episode of La Domenica Sportiva, then you can insert the sentence again. Until then, do not add it back. Soafy234 (talk) 23:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny in the Middle of the Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny in the Middle of the Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Skyshiftertalk 10:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Michael Hofmann de Boer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Louise (Manitoba), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Marysburgh Township, Ontario, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alastair King-Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alastair King-Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anne Sherriff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Sherriff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 13:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Diana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lake Louise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Edward Le Sage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Edward Le Sage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KH-1 (talk) 05:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Starla Whaley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommissarDoggo^Talk? 13:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip Egerton (died 1698), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Egerton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Hofmann de Boer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Charles Crewe, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 00:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ceredigion and Pembrokeshire (Senedd constituency). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is WP:TOOSOON (WP:CRYSTAL), the boundaries and names have not yet been finalised, particularly the names. Source used is about the initial proposals, which were replaced in December 2024 with another set of proposals. Happy to re-publish this article and encourage the creation of the others when the final recommendations have been announced sometime in March 2025 (so between tomorrow or a few weeks from now). Diolch/Thanks. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DankJae 20:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Diana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:25, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work on Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption d'Auvers-sur-Oise. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! Very interesting little article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 22:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add dates of birth, especially of living people,without showing a source: I have reverted 3 of your recent edits including Samantha Dixon. Thanks. PamD 22:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work on 1935 United Kingdom heatwaves. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page, consistent with others in Category:20th-century heat waves. A reminder that sentence case is preferred for headings and page titles; also be careful with capitals only for proper nouns.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Hallo, I've reverted your addition of Sarah Pochin's birth month. Wikipedia doesn't include birth dates sourced only to official information such as Companies House where someone has given their information whether they wanted to or not. See WP:BLPPRIMARY: we only use sources where the subject has chosen to give their birthdate, or given their age from which an approximate birthdate can be derived. (She'll probably be in the next edition of Who's Who - a spate of new birthdates for MPs have recently been added from the latest edition.) PamD 07:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

thanks for telling me , I have been trying to find birthdates for British mps including Pochin and many in the seniority list , thank you I had no idea about the whos who Ivanhardybirt (talk) 07:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Jay8g [V•T•E] 18:54, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nour News, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 12:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

that's ok , I'm letting the page on nour news being deleted due to me not being able to find relative data on it and it coming across as promotion Ivanhardybirt (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles Crewe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Charles Crewe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello Ivanhardybirt, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2025 Isle of Wight helicopter crash, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Isle of Wight helicopter crash.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:10, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eric Stuart, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. see WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

The redirect George Zinn (activist) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § George Zinn (activist) until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 06:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Diana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on 2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. – {{u|hekatlys}} 03:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

11WB (talk) 21:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Ivanhardybirt. I have some concerns regarding the sources you used for 2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash. Many of them returned 404s and were not reliable. There were also detections of LLM usage, which is generally prohibited. You are welcome to contribute articles to Wikipedia, but please make sure they are reliably sourced and are not reliant on AI. Thank you! 11WB (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is taking place at WP:AN/I#CIR: Ivanhardybirt. 11WB (talk) 05:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

This edit of yours changed Springfield pet-eating hoax to Springfield pet-eating conspiracy. It needn't be clarified that conspiracy and conspiracy theory/hoax are not the same. That you also removed criticism of the subject promoting these conspiracy theories/misinfo would lend credence to the fact that you were WP:POVPUSHing WP:HOAXes at enwiki, please do not repeat this again. Gotitbro (talk) 11:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of differences between the former and new systems, see WP:CTVSDS. FDW777 (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Rhiannon Leaman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheInevitables (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

The article German Pole (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Effectively unsourced. 1 source is a blog another an image. Fails WP:SIGCOV.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. scope_creep^Talk 06:12, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work on Queen's Hills. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for an occupied place. When creating articles, please don't rely on chatgpt to generate text; it's not trustworthy and undermines the basis of Wikipedia as a source generated by people. Nevertheless, I've checked your chatgpt source and they look sound (in this case). The text is brief, and therefore there is an argument that it would be better placed within Costessey.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Political Peerages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Political Peerages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 07:36, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Is there a source for the creation of the life peerage for Dame Ann Limb further to your recent edit? Bram880 (talk) 11:46, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

there is , on the house of lords website it mentioned she joined I tried to use that but it didn't let me Ivanhardybirt (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I will revert the edit until you provide the link, as there is nothing in the London Gazette as yet. If you find the source please feel free to provide an update. Bram880 (talk) 12:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

https://members.parliament.uk/members/lords?showadvanced=true&membershipstatus=3 here it shows baroness limb Ivanhardybirt (talk) 12:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work on Rhiannon Leaman, Baroness Leaman. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this biography for a member of national parliament (albeit in the upper chamber). It's rightly marked as a stub, given that we have essentially nothing before 2019.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:03, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work on Kylie Smith. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Michael Hofmann De Boer".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kennedy curse, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Category:Salvadoran people of English descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 00:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Johnny in the Middle of the Park has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 30 § Johnny in the Middle of the Park until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 05:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Axel Simon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 17 § Axel Simon until a consensus is reached. Pbritti (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Charlie Kirk's tent has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 17 § Charlie Kirk's tent until a consensus is reached. Pbritti (talk) 04:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)